scholarly journals WAVE OVERTOPPING ON RUBBLE MOUND BREAKWATERS

1988 ◽  
Vol 1 (21) ◽  
pp. 57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierliugi Aminti ◽  
Leopoldo Franco
Keyword(s):  
Hydraulic Model ◽  
Model Tests ◽  
Geometric Parameters ◽  
Random Wave ◽  
Wave Overtopping ◽  
Wave Flume ◽  
Rubble Mound ◽  
Rubble Mound Breakwaters

The paper gives the results of an extensive series of hydraulic model tests carried out in a random wave flume, in order to study the effects on wave overtopping of the main geometric parameters of a typical rubble mound breakwater with crown wall. The results have been compared with those from other studies and analyzed with different methods. Generalized design diagrams and formulae for the prediction of overtopping discharges are finally given for a large number of popular breakwater configurations.

scholarly journals ROUGHNESS FACTOR FOR MULTI-LAYER ARMOUR AS OVERTOPPING ESTIMATOR

2020 ◽  
pp. 25
Author(s):  
Leopoldo Franco ◽  
Yuri Pepi ◽  
Stefano de Finis ◽  
Verdiana Iorio ◽  
Giorgio Bellotti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Structural Characteristics ◽  
Storm Surges ◽  
Random Wave ◽  
Roughness Factor ◽  
Coastal Structures ◽  
Wave Overtopping ◽  
Wave Flume ◽  
Physical Model Tests ◽  
Rubble Mound ◽  
Rubble Mound Breakwaters

Nowadays one of the most challenging problem for engineers is to adapt existing coastal structures to climate changes. Wave overtopping is highly sensitive to the increasing extreme water depths due to higher storm surges coupled with sea level rise. One way to face these problems for rubble mound breakwaters is to add one or more layers to the existing armour. Prediction of wave overtopping of coastal structures is presently obtained from empirical formulae in EurOtop (2018). For the case of overtopping over multi-layer armour, no validated method exists, so prediction must be based upon assumptions and judgement, with related uncertainties. This study is focused on the effects of different types of armour, the number of layer and other structural characteristics on the roughness factor f. The main effects of porosity and roughness will be investigated. This paper analyzes the results of several new physical model tests of different rubble mound breakwaters reproduced at the new medium scale random wave flume of the Department of Engineering of Roma Tre University.Recorded Presentation from the vICCE (YouTube Link): https://youtu.be/8cOdqkqQ-9s

scholarly journals WAVE OVERTOPPING AT BERM BREAKWATERS IN LINE WITH EUROTOP

2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (33) ◽  
pp. 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sigurdur Sigurdarson ◽  
Jentsje W. Van der Meer
Keyword(s):  
Hydraulic Model ◽  
Model Tests ◽  
Wave Period ◽  
Wave Steepness ◽  
Wave Overtopping ◽  
Rubble Mound ◽  
Rubble Mound Breakwaters

The paper presents the development of a new overtopping formula for berm breakwaters. Overtopping data from hydraulic model tests of berm breakwaters have been gathered and reanalysed in line with the procedure in the EurOtop Manual. The data shows a clear dependency on wave period or wave steepness, which is in contrast to the main conclusion of the CLASH project and the EurOtop Manual for conventional rubble mound breakwaters. The formula is roughly validated on prototype performance.

Artificial Intelligence and Rubble-Mound Breakwater Stability

2012 ◽  
pp. 1499-1506
Author(s):  
Gregorio Iglesias Rodriguez ◽  
Alberte Castro Ponte ◽  
Rodrigo Carballo Sanchez ◽  
Miguel Ángel Losada Rodriguez
Keyword(s):  
Physical Model ◽  
Model Tests ◽  
Wave Action ◽  
Ann Model ◽  
Climate Conditions ◽  
Wave Flume ◽  
Physical Model Tests ◽  
Rubble Mound ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Rubble Mound Breakwaters

Breakwaters are coastal structures constructed to shelter a harbour basin from waves. There are two main types: rubble-mound breakwaters, consisting of various layers of stones or concrete pieces of different sizes (weights), making up a porous mound; and vertical breakwaters, impermeable and monolythic, habitually composed of concrete caissons. This article deals with rubble-mound breakwaters. A typical rubble-mound breakwater consists of an armour layer, a filter layer and a core. For the breakwater to be stable, the armour layer units (stones or concrete pieces) must not be removed by wave action. Stability is basically achieved by weight. Certain types of concrete pieces are capable of achieving a high degree of interlocking, which contributes to stability by impeding the removal of a single unit. The forces that an armour unit must withstand under wave action depend on the hydrodynamics on the breakwater slope, which are extremely complex due to wave breaking and the porous nature of the structure. A detailed description of the flow has not been achieved until now, and it is unclear whether it will be in the future in view of the turbulent phenomena involved. Therefore the instantaneous force exerted on an armour unit is not, at least for the time being, amenable to determination by means of a numerical model of the flow. For this reason, empirical formulations are used in rubble-mound design, calibrated on the basis of laboratory tests of model structures. However, these formulations cannot take into account all the aspects affecting the stability, mainly because the inherent complexity of the problem does not lend itself to a simple treatment. Consequently the empirical formulations are used as a predesign tool, and physical model tests in a wave flume of the particular design in question under the pertinent sea climate conditions are de rigueur, except for minor structures. The physical model tests naturally integrate all the complexity of the problem. Their drawback lies in that they are expensive and time consuming. In this article, Artificial Neural Networks are trained and tested with the results of stability tests carried out on a model breakwater. They are shown to reproduce very closely the behaviour of the physical model in the wave flume. Thus an ANN model, if trained and tested with sufficient data, may be used in lieu of the physical model tests. A virtual laboratory of this kind will save time and money with respect to the conventional procedure.

Prototype measurements and small-scale model tests of wave overtopping at shallow rubble-mound breakwaters: the Ostia-Rome yacht harbour case

2009 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 154-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leopoldo Franco ◽  
Jimmy Geeraerts ◽  
Riccardo Briganti ◽  
Marc Willems ◽  
Giorgio Bellotti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Model Tests ◽  
Scale Model ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Wave Overtopping ◽  
Rubble Mound ◽  
Rubble Mound Breakwaters ◽  
Small Scale Model

scholarly journals STABILITY FORMULA FOR TETRAPOD INCORPORATING SLOPE EFFECT

2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (33) ◽  
pp. 39
Author(s):  
Kyung-Duck Suh ◽  
Jin-Sung Kang
Keyword(s):  
Hydraulic Model ◽  
Model Tests ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Reasonable Accuracy ◽  
Rubble Mound ◽  
Wave Conditions ◽  
Rubble Mound Breakwaters ◽  
Packing Densities

To develop a stability formula for Tetrapods armoring rubble mound breakwaters, sixty hydraulic model tests have been conducted for various wave conditions and slope angles of breakwaters. The test results are used, along with the data of previous researchers, to develop a new stability formula. The developed formula is proven to be applicable to breakwaters with various slope angles with reasonable accuracy. It is also shown to be applicable to low-crested breakwaters and different packing densities, if the corresponding terms are incorporated in the formula. The uncertainty of the proposed formula is also given.

Artificial Intelligence and Rubble-Mound Breakwater Stability

2011 ◽  
pp. 144-150
Author(s):  
Gregorio Iglesias Rodriguez ◽  
Alberte Castro Ponte ◽  
Rodrigo Carballo Sanchez ◽  
Miguel Ángel Losada Rodriguez
Keyword(s):  
Physical Model ◽  
Model Tests ◽  
Wave Action ◽  
Ann Model ◽  
Climate Conditions ◽  
Wave Flume ◽  
Physical Model Tests ◽  
Rubble Mound ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Rubble Mound Breakwaters

Breakwaters are coastal structures constructed to shelter a harbour basin from waves. There are two main types: rubble-mound breakwaters, consisting of various layers of stones or concrete pieces of different sizes (weights), making up a porous mound; and vertical breakwaters, impermeable and monolythic, habitually composed of concrete caissons. This article deals with rubble-mound breakwaters. A typical rubble-mound breakwater consists of an armour layer, a filter layer and a core. For the breakwater to be stable, the armour layer units (stones or concrete pieces) must not be removed by wave action. Stability is basically achieved by weight. Certain types of concrete pieces are capable of achieving a high degree of interlocking, which contributes to stability by impeding the removal of a single unit. The forces that an armour unit must withstand under wave action depend on the hydrodynamics on the breakwater slope, which are extremely complex due to wave breaking and the porous nature of the structure. A detailed description of the flow has not been achieved until now, and it is unclear whether it will be in the future in view of the turbulent phenomena involved. Therefore the instantaneous force exerted on an armour unit is not, at least for the time being, amenable to determination by means of a numerical model of the flow. For this reason, empirical formulations are used in rubble-mound design, calibrated on the basis of laboratory tests of model structures. However, these formulations cannot take into account all the aspects affecting the stability, mainly because the inherent complexity of the problem does not lend itself to a simple treatment. Consequently the empirical formulations are used as a predesign tool, and physical model tests in a wave flume of the particular design in question under the pertinent sea climate conditions are de rigueur, except for minor structures. The physical model tests naturally integrate all the complexity of the problem. Their drawback lies in that they are expensive and time consuming. In this article, Artificial Neural Networks are trained and tested with the results of stability tests carried out on a model breakwater. They are shown to reproduce very closely the behaviour of the physical model in the wave flume. Thus an ANN model, if trained and tested with sufficient data, may be used in lieu of the physical model tests. A virtual laboratory of this kind will save time and money with respect to the conventional procedure.

scholarly journals Correction: Eldrup, M.R., et al. Stability of Rubble Mound Breakwaters—A Study of the Notional Permeability Factor, based on Physical Model Tests. Water 2019, 11, 934

Water ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 2483
Author(s):  
Mads Røge Eldrup ◽  
Thomas Lykke Andersen ◽  
Hans Falk Burcharth
Keyword(s):  
Physical Model ◽  
Model Tests ◽  
Permeability Factor ◽  
Physical Model Tests ◽  
Rubble Mound ◽  
Rubble Mound Breakwaters

The authors wish to make the following corrections to this paper [...]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document