Notes On the History of Mathematics

1951 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 256-258
Author(s):  
Vera Sanford

The recent discussion* of the rules for determining the sign of the product of two signed numbers suggested a study of the ways in which this question has been treated in algebras in the past. A problem of this type does not merit an exhaustive investigation. The question is how have various authors gone about the task of making this rule reasonable to the reader. The volumes chosen for the study were simply those that happened to be at hand: several of them were very influential; others were perhaps a bit obscure.

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (37) ◽  
pp. 25-78
Author(s):  
Joseph W. Dauben

The history of ancient Chinese mathematics and its applications has been greatly stimulated in the past few decades by remarkable archaeological discoveries of texts from the pre-Qin and later periods that make it possible to study in detail mathematical material from the time at which it was written. By examining the recent Warring States, Qin and Han bamboo mathematical texts currently being conserved and studied at Tsinghua University and Peking University in Beijing, the Yuelu Academy in Changsha, and the Hubei Museum in Wuhan, it is possible to shed new light on the history of early mathematical thought and its applications in ancient China. Also discussed here are developments of new techniques and justifications given for the problems that were a significant part of the growing mathematical corpus, and which eventually culminated in the comprehensive Nine Chapters on the Art of Mathematics. What follows is a revised text of an invited plenary lecture given during the 10th National Seminar on the History of Mathematics at UNICAMP in Campinas, SP, Brazil, on March 27, 2013.


2000 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 2-4
Author(s):  
Judith T. Sowder

The beginning of a new year as well as the threshold of a new century and a new millennium seem appropriate times to take stock of where we have been and where we are going as a mathematics education research community. We have accomplished a great deal in the past half century of our existence, and I for one look forward to reading the forthcoming book on the history of mathematics education, edited by Jeremy Kilpatrick and George Stanic. That book will review for us our progress thus far, but what are the challenges we now face? This question will be addressed in various ways at various gatherings in the coming year, and new agendas will result from those discussions.


1982 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
David C. Lindberg

Roger Bacon has often been victimized by his friends, who have exaggerated and distorted his place in the history of mathematics. He has too often been viewed as the first, or one of the first, to grasp the possibilities and promote the cause of modern mathematical physics. Even those who have noticed that Bacon was more given to the praise than to the practice of mathematics have seen in his programmatic statements an anticipation of seventeenth-century achievements. But if we judge Bacon by twentieth-century criteria and pronounce him an anticipator of modern science, we will fail totally to understand his true contributions; for Bacon was not looking to the future, but responding to the past; he was grappling with ancient traditions and attempting to apply the truth thus gained to the needs of thirteenth-century Christendom. If we wish to understand Bacon, therefore, we must take a backward, rather than a forward, look; we must view him in relation to his predecessors and contemporaries rather than his successors; we must consider not his influence, but his sources and the use to which he put them.


Author(s):  
Yvette Weiss

Learning from history does not automatically mean that history prevents us from repeating mistakes. We cannot see what happens in the future, even with the most profound knowledge of the past. Although it is not possible to make such causal connections, the study of structural components, which recur and make up patterns, can certainly contribute to sharpening political judgement. How can the teaching of the history of mathematics education then help to support an understanding of possible courses of individual actions without indoctrination through the political or even ideologically influenced production of time references? The paper presents the concept of a lecture course in mathematics education, held at the University of Mainz. We take as a point of departure the everyday experience of our prospective mathematics teacher with various current education reforms and present seemingly similar processes during former reforms. Here we limit ourselves to reforms during the 19th and 20th century.


1936 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 209-219
Author(s):  
Raymond Clare Archibald

In a vice-presidential address before Section A of the American Association for the Advancement of Science just six years ago, I made a somewhat detailed survey1 of our knowledge of Egyptian and Babylonian Mathematics before the Greeks. This survey set forth considerable material not then found in any general history of mathematics. During the six years since that time announcements of new discoveries in connection with Egyptian mathematics have been comparatively insignificant, and all known documents have probably been more or less definitively studied and interpreted. But the case of Babylonian mathematics is entirely different; most extraordinary discoveries have been made concerning their knowledge and use of algebra four thousand years ago. So far as anything in print is concerned, nothing of the kind was suspected even as late as 1928. Most of these recent discoveries have been due to the brilliant and able young Austrian scholar Otto Neugebauer who now at the age of 36 has a truly remarkable record of achievement during the past decade. It was only in 1926 that he received his doctor's degree in mathematics at Göttingen, for an interesting piece of research in Egyptian mathematics; but very soon he had taken up the study of Babylonian cuneiform writing. He acquired a mastery of book and periodical literature of the past fifty years, dealing with Sumerian, Akkadian, Babylonian, and Assyrian grammar, literature, metrology, and inscriptions; he discovered mathematical terminology, and translations the accuracy of which he thoroughly proved. He scoured museums of Europe and America for all possible mathematical texts, and translated and interpreted them. By 1929 he bad founded periodicals called Quellen und Studien zur Geschichte der mathematik2 and from the first, the latter contained remarkable new information concerning Babylonian mathematics. A trip to Russia resulted in securing for the Quellen section, Struve's edition of the first complete publication of the Golenishchev mathematical papyrus of about 1850 B.C. The third and latest volume of the Quellen, appearing only about three months ago, is a monumental work by Neugebauer himself, the first part containing over five hundred pages of text, and the second part in large quarto format, with over 60 pages of text and about 70 plates. This work was designed to discuss most known texts in mathematics and mathematical astronomy in cuneiform writing. And thus we find that by far the largest number of such tablets is in the Museum of Antiquities at Istanbul, that the State Museum in Berlin made the next larger contribution, Yale University next, then the British Museum, and the University of Jena, followed by the University of Pennsylvania, where Hilprecht, some thirty years ago, published a work containing some mathematical tables. In the Museum of the Louvre are 16 tablets; and then there are less than 8 in each of the following: the Strasbourg University and Library, the Musec Royaux du Cinquantenaire in Brussels, the J. Pierpont Morgan Library Collection (temporarily deposited at Yale) the Royal On tario Museum of Archaeology at Toronto, the Ashmolean Museum at Oxford, and the Böhl collection at Leyden. Most of the tablets thus referred to date from the period 2000 to 1200 B.C. It is a satisfaction to us to know that the composition of this wonderful reference work was in part made possible by The Rockefeller Foundation. Some two years ago it cooperated in enabling Neugebauer to transfer his work to the Mathematical Institute of the University of Copenhagen, after Nazi intolerance had rendered it impossible to preserve his self respect while pursuing the in tellectual life. This new position offered the opportunity for lecturing on the History of Ancient Mathematical Science. The first volume of these lectures3 on “Mathematics before the Greeks,” was published last year, and in it are many references to results, the exact setting of which are only found in his great source work referred to a moment ago. In these two works, then, we find not only a summing up of Neugebauer's wholly original work, but also a critical summary of the work of other scholars such as Frank, Gadd, Genouillac, Hilprecht, Lenormant, Rawlinson, Thureau-Dangin, Weidner, Zimmern, and many others.4 Hence my selection of material to be presented to you to-night will be mainly from these two works. Before turning to this it may not be wholly inappropriatp to interpolateoneremarkregarding Neugebauer's service to mathematics in general. Since 1931 his notable organizing ability has been partially occupied in editing and directing two other periodicals, (1) Zentralblatt fur Mathematik (of which 11 volumes have already appeared), and (2) Zentralblatt fur Mechanik, (3 volumes) a job which of itself would keep many a person fully employed. Mais, revenons à nos moutons!


1969 ◽  
Vol 62 (6) ◽  
pp. 479-480
Author(s):  
Howard Eves ◽  
Joseph Ayton

During the past summer I enjoyed a vacation in Ireland. Recalling the legend of the circumstances surrounding Sir William Hamilton's invention of noncommutative multiplication for quaternions, I decided to try to find the bridge in Dublin. According to Cajori's History of Mathematics, it is the Brougham Bridge (pronounced “Broom”) over the Royal Canal, and after some search I located it and photographed it.


2001 ◽  
Vol 94 (9) ◽  
pp. 780-784
Author(s):  
James E. Lightner

Students of the history of mathematics have long enjoyed the fascinating stories of the mathematical discoveries that have occurred over the past 4000 or so years. In considering the early developments, that is, those that happened before A.D. 100, we must often conjecture about who made the discovery or observation, where it really took place, and exactly when it happened. We still do not always know why the developments occurred when they did. However, mathematical developments often seem to be tied to the history of the world; certain periods of time have certainly been much more conducive to major mathematical activity than others. In other words, mathematics did not just happen; it was encouraged—or discouraged— by the zeitgeist—the nature of the prevailing culture— and the political, social, and economic conditions under which mathematicians had to work.


1931 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 122-124

The appearance of a history of mathematics in one volume will be greeted with satisfaction in view of the increasing need for such a work. Perhaps no subject associated with elementary mathematics, using elementary as referring to mathematics through college grade, has increased in interest during the past twenty-five years as has this one. Great strides have been taken in placing this history on a foundation of scientific accuracy through a use of primary sources. The two-volume work of the distinguished historian, Professor David Eugene Smith, has set a standard which should be sought by other writers. The stamp of his authority has been put on the work under review through an introduction to it.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document