Creating European Policy from a Regional Perspective – the Innovation of Transition Regions within the Regional Policy of the EU. Evidence from Saxony-Anhalt

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-150
Author(s):  
Romana Sălăgeanu
2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Iryna Vakhovych ◽  
Baktygul Satyvaldieva ◽  
Almazbek Dooranov ◽  
Mykola Slynko ◽  
Oleksandr Marchenko ◽  
...  

The article aims to study the international experience of smart specialization in regions and develop ways to improve it.The work uses methods of systematization, morphological analysis, graphic and empirical research.The authors investigated the essence, features and possibilities of smart specialization and schematically depicted it. The authors identified five principles of smart specialization, analyzed the foreign experience of smart specialization of regions. Based on the conducted studies of the European policy of unity and regional policy of the EU, they substantiated the expediency of introducing a model of smart specialization of regions to ensure sustainable regional development on an innovative basis and improve the living conditions of households.Based on the studied theoretical and methodological material, the authors developed ways to improve the smart specialization of regions, namely, an algorithm for substantiation of potential areas of smart specialization in the regions and the conceptual approach to the choice of strategic priorities for innovative regional development, taking into account the principles of "smart specialization".Recommendations are proposed for improving the processes of forming innovative regional strategies, taking into account the principles of the concept of "smart specialization", and the necessity of forming a map of unique, innovative competencies of regions and clusters of the country is substantiated.To visually reflect the state of smart specialization of regions, the authors proposed the use of two maps that neutralize each other's shortcomings and help make more balanced management decisions.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 (8) ◽  
pp. 75-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olena SNIHOVA ◽  

Prerequisites for the formation and development of the smart specialization concept in the EU are researched. The author identified the main characteristics of the smart specialization and its focus on mitigating the regional problems that impeded the realization of regional potential and discouraged the technological changes in the basic sectors of regional economy. It is found that entrepreneurial insight is the main principle of smart specialization, differentiating this innovative approach to priorities of the regional development setting from the previous ones. European practice of the smart specialization implementation is analyzed as based on the precise establishment of its correlation with the principal elements of the European policy of economic growth: regional, industrial and innovational components. The process of introducing the smart specialization in Ukraine is also being considered. Its specific features are revealed, touching upon the usage of the smart specialization approaches taking into account the regional specifics of the industrial development of the country. Inexpediency and unjustifiedness of the predominance of industrial component over other aspects of the smart specialization concept is justified. Proposals are made to improve the use of the smart specialization approaches, aimed at its becoming an instrument of a new regional policy, in Ukraine’s state policy.


2019 ◽  
Vol 67 ◽  
pp. 06026
Author(s):  
Oleksii Klok ◽  
Olha Loseva ◽  
Oleksandr Ponomarenko

The article studies theoretical and methodological bases of the strategic management of the development of administrative territories, considers the essence of strategic management and formulates the advantages of using it in management of administrative territory. Based on the analysis of the key provisions of the EU regional policy, the strategy of “smart specialization” is considered as the most common approach to territorial development. Using the experience of the countries of the European Union as a basis, a BPMN diagram, describing the conceptual bases for the formation of a competitive territory strategy, was built. Practical approaches to the formation of strategies for the development of administrative territories operating in Ukraine, regulatory acts, in particular, that had a direct impact on the formation of the existing model of strategic territorial management, were analyzed. The main requirements to the content of the strategic plan were considered and the list of key provisions and analytical methods (socio-economic analysis, comparative analysis, SWOT-analysis, PESTLE-analysis, sociological analysis) was formulated. Using the comparative legal analysis of the experience of the European Union as a basis, a number of features can be highlighted that must be taken into account in the process of forming the administrative territory development strategy.


2005 ◽  
Vol 50 (164) ◽  
pp. 81-102
Author(s):  
Theodore Theodoropoulos ◽  
Borut Vojinovic

This paper extends to test if the same short-run increase in cyclical volatility arising from financial integration is observed in this specific sample of "emerging markets". This work finds signs that, contrary to other emerging markets, this does not happen: for the future member states financial integration, similarly to the outcome observed in mature market economies, reduces cyclical volatility both in the short and in the long run. Weak indications are found that this may happen partially due to the anchoring of expectations provided by the EU Accession, and to the more robust institutional framework imposed by this process onto the countries in question.


Competitio ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-48
Author(s):  
Daniel Pop

This paper discusses how the CEE-10 countries complied with the EU conditionality in the field of regional policy, examining whether the territorial reforms implemented were carried out leading to the enrooting of sub-national regional governance structures. Following the discussion of the EU requirements in the field of regional policy, I turn to a case by case analysis of how the meso-level government tiers were set up in the CEE-10 countries. The analysis leads to the finding that the limited interest in the CEE-10 countries to develop extensive regional governance structures by creating new autonomous sub-national governance structures coupled with the frequent contradictory and often unofficial requirements by the European Commission during negotiations, has led to a weak institutionalization of meso-level governments when compared to the institutional and policy structures within the EU-15.


Author(s):  
Fiona Hayes-Renshaw

This chapter examines the inhabitants of, and working visitors to, the Council of Ministers’s headquarters in Brussels. The Council of Ministers has always occupied an important position among the European institutions and in European policy-making. As a European Union institution, it is involved in all areas of EU activity, both by legislating in tandem with the European Parliament (EP) and by coordinating the member states’ policies in particular fields. The chapter first traces the origins of the present-day Council of Ministers before discussing its hierarchy and what the Council does. It then considers how the Council deals with the other EU institutions such as the European Council, the EP, and the European Commission. It shows that the Council embodies the enduring tension between supranationalism and intergovernmentalism as explanatory tools for understanding the construction of the EU.


2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-12
Author(s):  
Jozef Tvrdoň ◽  
Eva Belvončíková

Creative economy has become an important part of the development policies for more than a decade. Traditional approaches and tools of regional policy have not sufficiently operated in the creative economy framework. The paper presents the first insight of authors an this topic. The first part is focused on creative economy as a policy object in theory and in the EU policy level. It is followed by examples from two countries oriented on SMEs policy tools and on institutional framework. On a basis of the case studies the paper also looks at policy tools and their status in Slovakia. The final part contains proposals for policy tools in two areas - tools oriented on small and medium sized enterprises support and tools for creation of a specific creative economy development conditions (regulatory framework, supporting institutions and intellectual property rights area).


Author(s):  
Simon Bulmer

The Federal Republic of Germany (FRG) was a founder member of the European integration process, namely the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) created in 1952. However, the circumstances were very different from the 2010s. Germany was a divided and defeated state until 1990. Integration provided important political and economic support to West Germany. From the 1970s, it strengthened the FRG’s foreign policy reach, for the new state was constrained by Cold War politics as well as other legacies, notably the Holocaust. European integration provided a framework for building trust with western neighbors, particularly France. The collapse of the German Democratic Republic (GDR) in 1989 and its absorption into the FRG through unification in 1990 brought about significant change to Germany’s relationship to European integration. The unified Germany became the largest member state. Initial concerns about German power in Europe were allayed by Chancellor Helmut Kohl pursuing deeper integration to bind the unified Germany further to integration: through creating the European Union (EU) itself and setting a course toward monetary union. Specific concerns about German power only really emerged in the 2010s, as the EU was bedeviled by several crises. In seeking to offer a comprehensive understanding of Germany’s relationship with the EU, coverage is organized around four broad themes: the historical dimension of the relationship; the substance of Germany’s European policy; the sources of Germany’s European policy; and Germany’s role and power in the EU. The historical dimension of Germany’s relationship with European integration is important as a first theme. It is no exaggeration to suggest that European integration helped emancipate the FRG from the historical legacy of turbulent relations with France, Nazi tyranny, and the opprobrium of the Holocaust. European integration afforded a complementary framework for Germany’s political and economic order. The importance of embedding German unification in a context of European integration should not be underestimated. Germany’s European policy has displayed considerable consistency up to the contemporary era. Support for further integration, for enlargement, the market order, and the development of an EU “civilian power” have been key components. These policies are important contributors to understanding Germany’s role in the EU: the second theme. The political and economic system of the FRG forms an important backdrop to understanding Germany’s policy and role in the EU: the third theme. From the 1960s until the 2010s, EU membership was subject to cross-party consensus and permissive public support. These circumstances allowed the federal government autonomy in pursuing its European policy. However, the political climate of European policy has become much more contested in the 2010s. Germany’s role was placed in the spotlight by the succession of crises that have emerged within the EU and in its neighborhood in the 2010s, particularly the eurozone and migration crises. The fourth theme explores how the question of German power re-emerged. These four themes are important to understanding Germany’s role in the EU, especially given Berlin’s centrality to its development.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document