A Discourse Ethics Approach To Social Shareholder Engagement: Developing A Normative Perspective

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 (1) ◽  
pp. 16431
Author(s):  
Jennifer Coralie Goodman ◽  
Daniel Arenas
Keyword(s):  
Discourse Ethics ◽  
Shareholder Engagement ◽  
Normative Perspective

scholarly journals Engaging Ethically: A Discourse Ethics Perspective on Social Shareholder Engagement

2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Goodman ◽  
Daniel Arenas
Keyword(s):  
Common Good ◽  
Theory Of The Firm ◽  
Discourse Ethics ◽  
Traditional Theory ◽  
Responsible Investment ◽  
Ethical Concerns ◽  
Political Role ◽  
Shareholder Engagement ◽  
Corporate Decisions ◽  
The Common

ABSTRACT:The primacy of shareholder demands in the traditional theory of the firm has typically excluded marginalised stakeholder voices. However, shareholders involved in social shareholder engagement (SSE) purport to bring these voices into corporate decision-making. In response to ethical concerns about the legitimacy of SSE, we use the lens of discourse ethics to provide a normative analysis at both action and constitutional levels. By specifying three normative questions, we extend the analysis of SSE to identify a political role for shareholders in pursuit of the common good. We demonstrate the desirability for SSE to promote regulatory/institutional change to guarantee marginalised stakeholders a voice in corporate decisions that affect them. The theory of SSE we propose thus calls into question the stark separation of the political and economic spheres and reveals an underlying tension, often overlooked, within the responsible investment literature.

Die Wirklichkeit des Sittlichen

2008 ◽  
Vol 2008 (2) ◽  
pp. 209-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolfgang Kersting
Keyword(s):  
Social Environment ◽  
Moral Philosophy ◽  
Discourse Ethics ◽  
Moral Knowledge ◽  
Moral Principle ◽  
Pure Reason ◽  
Kantian Ethics ◽  
Hermeneutic Approach ◽  
The Given ◽  
Moral Convictions

Within the Kantian ethics consciousness of the moral principle is a fact of reason which cannot be grounded in any antecedent data, empirical or rational. Hegel however argues that the fact of reason is necessarily embedded in the fact of „Sittlichkeit“, that a pure reason is an empty and chimerical construction, that moral knowledge is unavoidably rootet in the contingent moral convictions of the given cultural and social environment. This essay defends Hegel’s critique of Kant’s moral philosophy and – by generalizing Hegel’s hermeneutic approach – sketches the outlines of an explicatory concept of ethics which contradicts the scientistic understanding of moral philosophy characteristic for Kant, the utilitarianism and the supporters of discourse ethics likewise.

SRD II - New Shareholder Engagement & Transparency Obligations

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastiaan Niels Hooghiemstra ◽  
Hugo van Hees
Keyword(s):  
Shareholder Engagement

European Data Protection Regulation, Journalism, and Traditional Publishers

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Erdos
Keyword(s):  
New Media ◽  
Data Protection ◽  
Freedom Of Expression ◽  
Code Of Conduct ◽  
Academic Disciplines ◽  
General Data Protection Regulation ◽  
European Data ◽  
General Data ◽  
Professional Artists ◽  
Normative Perspective

This book explores the interface between European data protection and the freedom of expression activities of traditional journalism, professional artists, and both academic and non-academic writers from both an empirical and normative perspective. It draws on an exhaustive examination of both historical and contemporary public domain material and a comprehensive questionnaire of European Data Protection Authorities (DPAs). Empirically it is found that, notwithstanding an often confusing statutory landscape, DPAs have sought to develop an approach to regulating the journalistic media based on contextual rights balancing. However, they have struggled to secure a clear and specified criterion of strictness as regards standard-setting or a consistent and reliable approach to enforcement. DPAs have appeared even more confused as regards other traditional publishers, largely abstaining from regulating most professional artists and writers but attempting to subject all academic disciplines to onerous statutory restrictions established for medical, scientific, and related research. From these findings, it is argued that balancing contextual rights has value and should be both generalized across all traditional publishers and systematically and sensitively developed through structured and robust co-regulation. Such co-regulation should adopt the new code of conduct and monitoring provisions included in the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) as a broad guideline. DPAs should accord strong deference to any codes and monitoring bodies which verifiably meet the accredited criteria but must engage more proactively when these are absent. In any case, DPAs should also intervene directly as regards particularly serious or systematic issues and have an increasingly important role in ensuring a joined-up approach between traditional publishing and new media activity.

scholarly journals Empirical and normative ethics

2011 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 814-824 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lise-Lotte Jonasson ◽  
Per-Erik Liss ◽  
Björn Westerlind ◽  
Carina Berterö
Keyword(s):  
Medical Service ◽  
Empirical Studies ◽  
Empirical Ethics ◽  
Normative Ethics ◽  
Good Care ◽  
Older Patient ◽  
International Council ◽  
Empirical Perspective ◽  
Practical Performance ◽  
Normative Perspective

The aim of this study was to synthesize the concepts from empirical studies and analyze, compare and interrelate them with normative ethics. The International Council of Nurses (ICN) and the Health and Medical Service Act are normative ethics. Five concepts were used in the analysis; three from the grounded theory studies and two from the theoretical framework on normative ethics. A simultaneous concept analysis resulted in five outcomes: interconnectedness, interdependence, corroboratedness, completeness and good care are all related to the empirical perspective of the nurse’s interaction with the older patient, and the normative perspective, i.e. that found in ICN code and SFS law. Empirical ethics and normative ethics are intertwined according to the findings of this study. Normative ethics influence the nurse’s practical performance and could be supporting documents for nurses as professionals.

Globalizing Feminist Ethics

Hypatia ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 7-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison M. Jaggar
Keyword(s):  
Discourse Ethics ◽  
The Other ◽  
Discourse Community ◽  
Feminist Ethics ◽  
Small Communities ◽  
Local Contexts ◽  
Global Discourse ◽  
Open Discussion ◽  
The One

The feminist conception of discourse offered below differs from classical discourse ethics. Arguing that inequalities of power are even more conspicuous in global than in local contexts, I note that a global discourse community seems to be emerging among feminists, and I explore the role played by small communities in feminism's attempts to reconcile a commitment to open discussion, on the one hand, with a recognition of the realities of power inequalities, on the other.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document