The Microchemical Analysis of Rubber
Abstract While those who profess to be microchemists have a number of specialized techniques, it is surprising how often microchemistry is used without appreciation that this is being done. As examples in the analysis of rubber, two qualitative color tests may be mentioned that are both applicable to small samples. The first was described by Weber in 1900, but interest in it has been revised recently by Stern and by Parker and Wake. In this test the rubber is treated with bromine and then with phenol; natural rubber gives a violet color and so may be distinguished from synthetic elastomers. In the second test, due to Kirchhof, natural rubber is detected by the yellow-to-red color which it gives with trichloroacetic acid. Other reactions carried out with small quantities of rubber for identification purposes include the well known Beilstein test for halogens, in which the organic substance when heated on a copper wire imparts a green color to a Bunsen flame. This method was suggested by Newton for the detection of chloroprenes, and has been applied by Shaw in a systematic procedure for the identification of plastics in general. Spot tests have also been devised that depend on the reactions of the vapors produced by destructive distillation of the rubber being examined; for example, Neoprene gives vapors which bleach paper impregnated with potassium chromate, or the density and pH value of the distillate may be determined. The rates of reaction of natural rubber and various synthetic elastomers with mixed nitric and sulfuric acids has been shown to be characteristic and may be determined with small samples. In contrast with the above, some procedures have been called micromethods by their advocates merely because the samples used are smaller than usual. Microchemistry was clearly defined by Emich as covering the range 2 to 10 mg. of substance, and the present author's work described below should properly be termed semimicroanalysis.