A Short Note on the Tensile Testing of Rubber

1932 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 351-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Jones

Abstract The evaluation of rubber has centered largely around stress-strain phenomena, and the property of tensile strength is probably the one which has the most general application throughout the industry. Rubber exhibits stress-strain properties quite different from the majority of substances, and peculiar difficulties are introduced during the determination of tensile strength. Although tentative standards have recently been issued by the American Chemical Society, there is no evidence that these are being strictly adhered to, and there is still need for a more rigid standardization of tensile-testing methods. There are essentially two methods of tensile-testing: (1) Using dumb-bell test-pieces with a Bureau of Standards machine, or a Scott type of machine; and (2) Using ring test-pieces with a Schopper type of machine. It is generally supposed that higher tensile results are obtained by the former method. Recently, occasion has occurred to make a comparison between both types and to study the effect of certain factors upon each method.

1940 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 451-467
Author(s):  
I. Slbiriakoff

Abstract The investigation which has just been described can be summarized as follows: (1) A technique for the commercial testing of plantation rubber has been developed which is simple and precise, and by means of which it is possible to reproduce control tests, a feature which is indispensable if rubber is to be sold on a basis of quality rather than superficial appearance. (2) The tentative specifications for testing rubber drawn up by the Crude Rubber Committee of the Division of Rubber Chemistry of the American Chemical Society have been found acceptable as a basis for this testing procedure. (3) It has been found necessary, however, to revise the specifications of the Crude Rubber Committee in some ways and to amplify them, so that they fulfill the three conditions described above and also conform to the particular working conditions of laboratories in the tropics. The revisions to the Crude Rubber Committee specifications include: (1) The use of an autoclave for vulcanizing in open steam. (2) A mill roll temperature of 65° C instead of 70° C. (3) A definite, fixed weight of batch, containing 200 grams of rubber, plus accessory ingredients. (4) A temperature of 25° to 30° C during testing. (5) The use of ring test-specimens instead of dumb-bell specimens.


1938 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 214-223
Author(s):  
R. Ariano

Abstract It is of course a well known fact that both ring test-specimens and flat or straight test-specimens are used in testing rubber. Ring test-specimens have for a long time been the most generally used type for testing rubber mixtures, whereas in American laboratories straight test-specimens are preferred. Ring test-specimens are the more convenient to use, but they are open to one fundamental objection, that different parts of the cross section of the rubber are elongated to different extents at any particular moment. Even straight test-specimens are not free from objectionable features. With this type of test-specimen, the inequality in the deformation at any particular instant results from the necessity of having enlarged ends for the testing machine to avoid breakage of the test-specimens in the jaws. It therefore becomes necessary to study systematically the form and dimensions of the end sections of the test-specimens and of the junction of these end sections with the central section, so that the points of rupture will not become localized in the sections in the jaws or close to these sections. As a matter of fact, an extensive investigation of this problem has been made by the Physical Testing Committee of the Rubber Division of the American Chemical Society. By a proper study of the shape of the test-specimen, it is possible to design the test-specimen so that rupture occurs in the center section and therefore so that satisfactory tensile strength measurements are obtained.


1928 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 515-594
Author(s):  
J. E. Partenheimer ◽  
E. R. Bridgwater ◽  
D. F. Cranor ◽  
E. B. Curtis ◽  
J. W. Schade ◽  
...  

Abstract IN OCTOBER, 1926, R. P. Dinsmore, chairman of the Rubber Division of the AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, appointed a Physical Testing Committee to investigate the effect of variables such as temperature and relative humidity upon the physical properties of rubber. This committee was continued by Harry L. Fisher, present chairman of the Rubber Division. The committee chose the problem of determining the importance of controlling atmospheric temperature and relative humidity while conditioning rubber test samples at various stages of preparation and testing. This report deals with the first study made—that of the effect of the above two variables on the stress-strain and tensile properties of rubber. In reading this report it should be kept in mind that the problem of this committee is to determine the effect of variables on the physical properties of rubber so that we may know the relative importance of controlling the factors involved. It was not intended to make this work include the relative value of specific tests for particular purposes or to become a research directed towards the development of new tests. It has been the intent to limit the work of the committee to the refinement of tests widely used and considered as routine and standard, and not to include development of new tests or work concerning broader lines of research. It is, however, hoped that in the future the work of this or another committee can be broadened to include fundamental research problems as well as specific work such as the present committee has undertaken. We believe that the work done demonstrates the desirability of carrying on cooperative investigations of this nature and hope that this committee is made a permanent institution of the Rubber Division with such changes in personnel as are necessary continually to broaden and improve the work. This report will raise many questions and point out several possible lines of research, but the committee has tried to stick to its job of determining the relative importance of controlling temperature and relative humidity in relation to stress-strain and tensile properties. The work has been carried out at the Bureau of Standards at Washington by F. E. Rupert as a research associate under the direction of the committee. The Bureau of Standards has contributed its facilities and to cover the expenditures of the committee for the first year each company represented by the members of the committee contributed $650. The Rubber Association of America is handling the finances of the committee for the present year, which amounts to $6000 and includes the appropriation of the Firestone Tire and Rubber Company. As the committee has needed special apparatus different companies have loaned machines, which have included a Scott tensile tester and U. S. abrasion machine from the Henry L. Scott Company, and a Grasselli abrader from the Grasselli Chemical Company.


2014 ◽  
Vol 606 ◽  
pp. 35-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pavol Zubko ◽  
Ladislav Pešek

The contribution deals with prediction of tensile properties based on measurement of microhardness. First of all, the database of stress strain, s-e vs. hardness data was created. Tensile strength, yield strength, ductility and parameters of Ludwig-Hollomon equation σ = σ0+kεn; k, n were correlated with hardness. Various hardness values found in literature were recalculated to Brinell hardness. In tensile testing measured s-e curves were compared with that obtained from the correlation. The investigated materials were API 5 L grade steels X70 after different deformation exposition. The results give good agreement between compared data. The most difference between estimated and measured curve is in area of yield strength, because of Lüders deformation on investigated steel.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document