scholarly journals A gender-based comparison of promotion and research productivity in academic dermatology

2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann M John ◽  
Arjun B Gupta ◽  
Elizabeth S John ◽  
Santiago A Lopez ◽  
William Clark Lambert
Keyword(s):  
Research Productivity ◽  
Gender Based

Gender-based analysis of pre-residency research productivity among a current United States radiation oncology resident class.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10504-10504
Author(s):  
Shearwood McClelland ◽  
Blair Murphy ◽  
Jerry Jeff Jaboin ◽  
Richard C. Zellars
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Oncology ◽  
Research Productivity ◽  
Junior Resident ◽  
Female Representation ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Gender Based ◽  
Dual Degrees ◽  
Residency Application ◽  
Dual Degree ◽  
A Current

10504 Background: The increasing proportion of women in medicine has not been adequately reflected in the gender distribution of residents, particularly in highly competitive subspecialties such as neurosurgery and radiation oncology. The presence of at least one pre-residency peer-reviewed publication (PRP) was found to be associated with future resident choice of academic over private practice career in a recent radiation oncology resident graduating class, with no significant gender difference in the likelihood of having a PRP (McClelland et al., Practical Radiation Oncology 2017). We sought to pursue a gender-based analysis of PRP productivity in a current junior resident class. Methods: A list of radiation oncology residents from the graduating class of 2022 (PGY-2 academic year of 2018-2019) was obtained through internet investigation. In addition to gender, demographics included dual degree status and presence/absence of a PhD. Research productivity was calculated using PRP number, defined as the number of a resident’s publications listed in PubMed (pubmed.gov) through the calendar year of residency application (2016 for the class of 2022), as previously described. Fisher’s exact test was used for statistical analysis. Results: Of 179 residents examined from the 2022 class, 55 (31%) were women, representing a nine percent increase from the resident class of 2016. Four-fifths had at least one PRP, 33% had dual degrees, and 18% had a PhD. These percentages were comparable to their male counterparts, 73% of whom had at least one PRP, 28% who had dual degrees, and 15% who had a PhD. Specific analyses revealed no statistically significant differences by gender in any of these benchmarks (p>0.05). Conclusions: While slower than the overall trend of increased female representation in medicine, the proportion of women in radiation oncology residency has increased by approximately 1.4% per year over a recent six year span. There remain no significant differences in PRP productivity between male and female residents, and there are no significant gender differences in the likelihood of dual degree status or PhD status. Further study will be needed to determine how these findings manifest in career choice following graduation.

scholarly journals Gender-based analysis of pre-residency research productivity among a current United States radiation oncology resident class

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 52-52
Author(s):  
Shearwood McClelland III ◽  
Blair Murphy ◽  
Jerry J. Jaboin ◽  
Richard C. Zellars
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Radiation Oncology ◽  
Research Productivity ◽  
Gender Based ◽  
A Current

Gender-Based Analysis of Intra-Institutional Research Productivity and Collaboration

2018 ◽  
Vol 162 (4) ◽  
pp. 237-258
Author(s):  
Miloš Savić ◽  
Mirjana Ivanović ◽  
Miloš Radovanović ◽  
Bojana Dimić Surla
Keyword(s):  
Research Productivity ◽  
Institutional Research ◽  
Gender Based

scholarly journals Gender-Based Disparity in Academic Ranking and Research Productivity Among Canadian Anesthesiology Faculty

Cureus ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric N Esslinger ◽  
Michael Van der Westhuizen ◽  
Sabeena Jalal ◽  
Sarmad Masud ◽  
Faisal Khosa
Keyword(s):  
Research Productivity ◽  
Academic Ranking ◽  
Gender Based

Research productivity in psychology.

1989 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 735-736 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Miles Cox ◽  
Joseph P. Blount
Keyword(s):  
Research Productivity

An evaluation of research productivity among I-O psychology doctoral programs

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela A. Beiler ◽  
Lauren M. Zimmerman ◽  
Alexa J. Doerr ◽  
Malissa A. Clark
Keyword(s):  
Research Productivity ◽  
Doctoral Programs ◽  
Psychology Doctoral
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document