An evaluation of research productivity among I-O psychology doctoral programs

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela A. Beiler ◽  
Lauren M. Zimmerman ◽  
Alexa J. Doerr ◽  
Malissa A. Clark
Keyword(s):  
Research Productivity ◽  
Doctoral Programs ◽  
Psychology Doctoral

Research productivity of I-O psychology doctoral programs in North America

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joy Oliver ◽  
Carrie A. Blair ◽  
C. Allen Gorman ◽  
David J. Woehr
Keyword(s):  
North America ◽  
Research Productivity ◽  
Doctoral Programs ◽  
Psychology Doctoral

Doctoral Training of Psychology Students in France

2003 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Roland-Lévy
Keyword(s):  
Doctoral Programs ◽  
Psychology Students ◽  
Doctoral Training ◽  
University System ◽  
The Third ◽  
Conducting Research ◽  
The University ◽  
Psychology Doctoral ◽  
Phd Programs ◽  
Phd Program

Abstract: The aim of doctoral programs in psychology is to help students become competent psychologists, capable of conducting research and of finding suitable employment. Starting with a brief description of the basic organization of the French university system, this paper presents an overview of how the psychology doctoral training is organized in France. Since October 2000, the requisites and the training of PhD students are the same in all French universities, but what now differs is the openness to other disciplines according to the size and location of the university. Three main groups of doctoral programs are distinguished in this paper. The first group refers to small universities in which the Doctoral Schools are constructed around multidisciplinary seminars that combine various themes, sometimes rather distant from psychology. The second group covers larger universities, with a PhD program that includes psychology as well as other social sciences. The third group contains a few major universities that have doctoral programs that are clearly centered on psychology (clinical, social, and/or cognitive psychology). These descriptions are followed by comments on how PhD programs are presently structured and organized. In the third section, I suggest some concrete ways of improving this doctoral training in order to give French psychologists a more European dimension.

Student perceptions of multicultural training and program climate in clinical psychology doctoral programs.

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 293-307
Author(s):  
Samantha J. Gregus ◽  
Kimberly T. Stevens ◽  
Nicholas P. Seivert ◽  
Raymond P. Tucker ◽  
Jennifer L. Callahan
Keyword(s):  
Student Perceptions ◽  
Clinical Psychology ◽  
Doctoral Programs ◽  
Multicultural Training ◽  
Psychology Doctoral

Accounting Doctoral Program Rankings Based on Research Productivity of Program Graduates

2011 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 149-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathaniel M. Stephens ◽  
Scott L. Summers ◽  
Brady Williams ◽  
David A. Wood
Keyword(s):  
Information Systems ◽  
Research Productivity ◽  
Doctoral Programs ◽  
Accounting Information ◽  
Doctoral Program ◽  
Academic Programs ◽  
Accounting Information Systems ◽  
Time Periods ◽  
Program Research

SYNOPSIS: This paper presents rankings of accounting doctoral programs based on the research productivity of each institution’s graduates in the years immediately following their graduation. We use two time periods for analysis: the first three years after graduation and the first six years after graduation. We extend previous doctoral program ranking literature by expanding rankings of accounting doctoral programs with specific rankings for topical areas (accounting information systems [AIS], audit, financial, managerial, and tax) and methodologies (analytical, archival, and experimental). We show that rankings for topical and methodological areas differ significantly from rankings produced using methodologies that create a singular doctoral program ranking. These results emphasize the importance of considering topical and methodological areas when assessing doctoral program research strengths. These rankings should be of value to Ph.D. program applicants, administrators of academic programs, and industry—such as administrators of programs like the Accounting Doctoral Scholars program, KPMG Ph.D. Project, and prospective Ph.D. students.

Comparing the research productivity of social work doctoral programs using the h-Index

2018 ◽  
Vol 116 (3) ◽  
pp. 1513-1530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas E. Smith ◽  
Kat S. Jacobs ◽  
Philip J. Osteen ◽  
T. Edison Carter
Keyword(s):  
Social Work ◽  
Research Productivity ◽  
Doctoral Programs ◽  
H Index
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document