scholarly journals Assessment of sperm deoxyribose nucleic acid fragmentation using sperm chromatin dispersion assay

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 45 ◽  
Author(s):  
SumaYekappa Hottigoudar ◽  
Harsha Pratap ◽  
KuberaSiddappa Nichanahalli ◽  
Parkash Chand
Keyword(s):  
Nucleic Acid ◽  
Sperm Chromatin ◽  
Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid

A partially incoherent rate theory of long-range charge transfer in deoxyribose nucleic acid

2002 ◽  
Vol 117 (9) ◽  
pp. 4578-4584 ◽  
Author(s):  
HouYu Zhang ◽  
Xin-Qi Li ◽  
Ping Han ◽  
Xiang Yang Yu ◽  
YiJing Yan
Keyword(s):  
Charge Transfer ◽  
Nucleic Acid ◽  
Long Range ◽  
Rate Theory ◽  
Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid

Synthesis, crystal structure, deoxyribose nucleic acid interaction and antitumor activity of some thiosemicarbazonatomolybdenum(VI)

2014 ◽  
Vol 421 ◽  
pp. 270-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mouayed A. Hussein ◽  
Teoh S. Guan ◽  
Rosenani A. Haque ◽  
Mohamed B. Khadeer Ahamed ◽  
Amin M.S. Abdul Majid
Keyword(s):  
Crystal Structure ◽  
Nucleic Acid ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Acid Interaction ◽  
Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid

CHIASMUS IN ART AND TEXT

2013 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-88
Author(s):  
Edmund Thomas
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Structure ◽  
Twentieth Century ◽  
Nucleic Acid ◽  
Nucleic Acids ◽  
Double Helix ◽  
Scientific Article ◽  
Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid ◽  
Francis Crick

Sixty years ago, on 25 April 1953, probably the most influential scientific article of the twentieth century appeared. Its uninviting title, ‘Molecular Structure of Nucleic Acids: A Structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid’, concealed the revolutionary discovery by the molecular biologists James Watson and Francis Crick of the structure of what became known as ‘the molecule of life’. The ‘radically different structure’ that they proposed for the salt of deoxyribose nucleic acid (DNA) had ‘two helical chains each coiled round the same axis’. ‘Both chains’, they wrote, ‘follow right-handed helices, but owing to the dyad the sequences of the atoms in the two chains run in opposite directions.’ When Bruno J. Strasser asked in the same journal fifty years later ‘Who cares about the double helix?’, he answered that it marked ‘an age of (lost) innocence, when youth, intelligence and self-assurance were sufficient to make great discoveries in science’.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document