scholarly journals Adolescent differences in knee stability following computer-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa A. Christino ◽  
Bryan G. Vopat ◽  
Gregory R. Waryasz ◽  
Alexander Mayer ◽  
Steven E. Reinert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Internal Rotation ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Computer Navigation ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Single Bundle ◽  
Knee Stability ◽  
Adolescent Patients ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

<div class="page" title="Page 1"><div class="section"><div class="layoutArea"><div class="column"><p><span>Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery is being increasingly performed in the adolescent population. Computer navigation offers a reliable way to quantitatively measure knee stability during ACL reconstruction. A retrospective review of all adolescent patients (&lt;18 years old) who underwent computer-assisted primary single bundle ACL reconstruction by a single surgeon from 2007 to 2012 was performed. The average age was 15.8 years (SD 3.3). Female adolescents were found to have higher internal rotation than male adolescents both pre- (25.6° </span><em>vs </em><span>21.7°, P=0.026) and post-reconstruction (20.1° </span><em>vs </em><span>15.1°, P=0.005). Compared to adults, adolescents demonstrated significantly higher internal rotation both pre- (23.3° </span><em>vs </em><span>21.5°, P=0.047) and post-reconstruction (17.1° </span><em>vs </em><span>14.4°, P=0.003). They also had higher total rotation both pre- (40.9° </span><em>vs </em><span>38.4°, P=0.02) and post-reconstruction when compared to adults (31.56° </span><em>vs </em><span>28.67°, P=0.005). In adolescent patients, anterior translation was corrected more than rotation. Females had higher pre- and residual post-reconstruction internal rotation compared to males. When compared to adults, adolescents had increased internal rotation and total rotation both pre- and post-reconstruction. </span></p></div></div></div></div>

scholarly journals The Influence of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Remnant on Postoperative Clinical Results in Patients with Remnant Preserving Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 624-629 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan Goce Andonovski ◽  
Sonja Topuzovska ◽  
Milan Samardziski ◽  
Zoran Bozinovski ◽  
Biljana Andonovska ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Single Bundle ◽  
Knee Stability ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Proprioceptive Function

BACKGROUND: Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) remnants have important biomechanical, vascular and proprioceptive function.AIM: To determine the influence of the ACL residual remnants after partial and complete ACL ruptures on postoperative clinical results in patients with remnant preserving ACL reconstruction.PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 66 patients divided into two groups. In patients from the investigation group remnant preserving ACL reconstruction was performed, in patients from the control group single bundle ACL reconstruction was performed. The results were assessed by Rolimeter measurements, Lysholm and Tegner scores and proprioception evaluation.RESULTS: The mean side-to-side difference of anterior tibia displacement (mm) was improved from 4.4 ± 1.06 to 0.4 ± 0.7 in the investigation group, and from 4.6 ± 0.68 to 1.9 ± 0.64 in the control group (p < 0.001). Difference in the angles in which the knee was placed by the device and the patient has improved from 1.5 ± 0.96° to 0.5 ± 0.53° in the investigation group and from 1.8 ± 0.78° to 1.3 ± 0.97° in the control group (p < 0.05).  Tegner and Lysholm scores showed no difference between the groups.CONCLUSION: Preservation of the ACL residual bundle provides a better knee stability and proprioceptive function.

scholarly journals Stability Outcomes following Computer-Assisted ACL Reconstruction

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Melissa A. Christino ◽  
Bryan G. Vopat ◽  
Alexander Mayer ◽  
Andrew P. Matson ◽  
Steven E. Reinert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Rotation ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Single Bundle ◽  
Anterior Instability ◽  
Knee Stability ◽  
Anterior Translation ◽  
Stability Measurements

Purpose. The purpose of this study was to determine whether intraoperative prereconstruction stability measurements and/or patient characteristics were associated with final knee stability after computer-assisted ACL reconstruction.Methods. This was a retrospective review of all patients who underwent computer-assisted single-bundle ACL reconstruction by a single surgeon. Prereconstruction intraoperative stability measurements were correlated with patient characteristics and postreconstruction stability measurements. 143 patients were included (87 male and 56 female). Average age was 29.8 years (SD ± 11.8).Results. Females were found to have significantly more pre- and postreconstruction internal rotation than males (P< 0.001 andP= 0.001, resp.). Patients with additional intra-articular injuries demonstrated more prereconstruction anterior instability than patients with isolated ACL tears (P< 0.001). After reconstruction, these patients also had higher residual anterior translation (P= 0.01). Among all patients with ACL reconstructions, the percent of correction of anterior translation was found to be significantly higher than the percent of correction for internal or external rotation (P< 0.001).Conclusion. Anterior translation was corrected the most using a single-bundle ACL reconstruction. Females had higher pre- and postoperative internal rotation. Patients with additional injuries had greater original anterior translation and less operative correction of anterior translation compared to patients with isolated ACL tears.

The Contribution of Partial Meniscectomy to Preoperative Laxity and Laxity After Anatomic Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: In Vivo Kinematics With Navigation

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (13) ◽  
pp. 3203-3211
Author(s):  
Alberto Grassi ◽  
Stefano Di Paolo ◽  
Gian Andrea Lucidi ◽  
Luca Macchiarola ◽  
Federico Raggi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Knee Flexion ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Single Bundle ◽  
Anatomic Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Medial Meniscectomy ◽  
Lateral Meniscectomy ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Limited in vivo kinematic information exists on the effect of clinical-based partial medial and lateral meniscectomy in the context of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Hypothesis: In patients with ACL deficiency, partial medial meniscus removal increases the anteroposterior (AP) laxity with compared with those with intact menisci, while partial lateral meniscus removal increases dynamic laxity. In addition, greater postoperative laxity would be identified in patients with partial medial meniscectomy. Study design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 164 patients with ACL tears were included in the present study and divided into 4 groups according to the meniscus treatment they underwent: patients with partial lateral meniscectomy (LM group), patients with partial medial meniscectomy (MM group), patients with partial medial and lateral meniscectomy (MLM group), and patients with intact menisci who did not undergo any meniscus treatment (IM group). A further division in 2 new homogeneous groups was made based on the surgical technique: 46 had an isolated single-bundle anatomic ACL reconstruction (ACL group), while 13 underwent a combined single-bundle anatomic ACL reconstruction and partial medial meniscectomy (MM-ACL group). Standard clinical laxities (AP translation at 30° of knee flexion, AP translation at 90° of knee flexion) and pivot-shift (PS) tests were quantified before and after surgery by means of a surgical navigation system dedicated to kinematic assessment. The PS test was quantified through 3 different parameters: the anterior displacement of the lateral tibial compartment (lateral AP); the posterior acceleration of the lateral AP during tibial reduction (posterior acceleration); and finally, the area included by the lateral AP translation with respect to the flexion/extension angle (area). Results: In the ACL-deficient status, the MM group showed a significantly greater tibial translation compared with the IM group ( P < .0001 for AP displacement at 30° [AP30] and 90° [AP90] of flexion) and the LM group ( P = .002 for AP30 and P < .0001 for AP90). In the PS test, the area of LM group was significantly larger (57%; P = .0175) than the one of the IM group. After ACL reconstruction, AP translation at 30° was restored, while the AP90 remained significantly greater at 1.3 mm ( P = .0262) in the MM-ACL group compared with those with intact menisci. Conclusion: Before ACL reconstruction, partial medial meniscectomy increased AP laxity at 30° and 90° and lateral meniscectomy increased dynamic PS laxity with respect to intact menisci. Anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction decreased laxities, but a residual anterior translation of 1.3 mm at 90° remained in patients with partial medial meniscectomy, with respect to those with intact menisci.

scholarly journals Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Graft Options

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (6_suppl3) ◽  
pp. 2325967118S0004
Author(s):  
Gustavo Vinagre ◽  
João Saraiva
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Return To Play ◽  
Knee Stability ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Sports Traumatology ◽  
The Ideal

Introduction: The Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) tear is one of the most feared injuries since it can be crucial in the athlete’s career. The ACL reconstruction is one of the most frequent surgical procedures in Sports and the goal is to restore knee stability and avoid further injuries on the meniscus and cartilage, representing a constant topic of debate in Sports Traumatology. There are different graft options for ACL reconstruction that have been described over the years, addressed by different studies with controversy and different outcomes. The decision of the ideal graft for an ACL reconstruction is very complex, but should be consensual among all those involved in the injury process, and should be taken according to patient´s anatomy, physical demand and intrinsic graft specifications, that are key to know and understand. Objectives: Review and summarize the different graft options available for ACL reconstruction in order to make an optimal and individualized choice for each athlete to maximize the return to play and back to Sports at pre-injury levels. Methods: A literature review was performed on PubMed / Medline electronic databases with the words “ACL graft” by relevance. The articles with graft comparisons specifications were selected. Results: The results of our review were summarized with the advantages and disadvantages of the following grafts: Bone-Tendon-Bone (BTB) autograft; hamstrings autograft, quadriceps autograft and allografts. Conclusion: Taking into account the scientific knowledge available and despite the differences in each graft, the choice of the ideal graft that should be used in the ACL reconstruction should be individualized for each athlete, according to intrinsic graft specifications and extrinsic particularities of each sport and athlete.

scholarly journals Higher Rate of Patellofemoral Problems After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction using Hamstring Autograft

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (B) ◽  
pp. 811-815
Author(s):  
Krisna Yuarno Phatama ◽  
Romy Darmawansa ◽  
I Gusti Ngurah Arga Aldrian Oktafandi ◽  
Felix Cendikiawan ◽  
Alva Pribadi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Single Bundle ◽  
Hamstring Autograft ◽  
Peroneus Longus Tendon ◽  
Peroneus Longus ◽  
Kujala Score ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Tendon Autograft

Background: Patellofemoral problems are not uncommon among post-anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction patients. Hamstring autograft harvesting-related factor is one of the suspected causes. A lack of tibiofemoral internal rotation force due to strength deficit causes the patella tends to shift laterally. Purposes: Peroneus longus tendon has been proposed as an alternative graft source due to its adequate tensile strength and minimal donor site morbidity to the knee biomechanics, including the patellofemoral joint. This tendon does not cross the knee joint and thus does not affect patellofemoral alignment and biomechanics. This study aims to compare patellofemoral problems between hamstring and peroneus longus autograft harvested-patients following ACL reconstruction. Material and methods: Thirty-one subjects who underwent primary single-bundle ACL reconstruction between September 2018 and September 2019 and met the inclusion criteria were grouped into the hamstring group (n=16) and peroneus longus group (n=15). Both groups were evaluated retrospectively. The follow-up assessment was conducted on the phase II rehabilitation program. The assessed variables were pain, crepitus, and the Indonesian-validated Kujala score. Results: No significant differences in pain and crepitus were found between both groups. There were significant differences in the Kujala score between both groups (P < .001). The peroneus longus group reported an averagely higher score than the hamstring group. Conclusion: Single bundle ACL reconstruction using peroneus longus tendon autograft produces less patellofemoral symptoms and functional limitation than using hamstring tendon autograft.

Chronological Changes in Anterior Knee Stability after Anatomical Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Bone–Patellar Tendon–Bone and Hamstring Grafts

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kohei Kawaguchi ◽  
Shuji Taketomi ◽  
Hiroshi Inui ◽  
Ryota Yamagami ◽  
Keiu Nakazato ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Patellar Tendon ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Knee Stability ◽  
Bptb Graft ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Double Bundle Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Anterior Knee ◽  
Bone Patellar Tendon

AbstractThe clinical outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction are typically evaluated at specific time points only. This study aimed to characterize the chronological changes in anterior knee stability after anatomical ACL reconstruction and to compare the anterior knee stability achieved with bone–patellar tendon–bone (BPTB) and hamstring tendon (HT) grafts. A total of 59 patients underwent anatomical rectangular tunnel ACL reconstruction using the BPTB graft and 23 patients underwent anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction using the HT graft. Anterior knee stability was quantitatively assessed using the KneeLax 3 arthrometer at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery using side-to-side differences. The values for anterior knee stability using the BPTB graft were 0.3 mm after 6 months, 0.2 mm after 1 year, and 0.2 mm after 2 years, and no significant differences were observed during the postoperative study period. Meanwhile, the values for anterior knee stability using the HT graft were −0.3 mm after 6 months, 0.5 mm after 1 year, and 1.2 mm after 2 years, and anterior knee stability decreased chronologically from 6 months up to 2 years. Regarding anterior stability, the HT graft showed significant laxity compared with the BPTB graft only after 2 years. No chronological changes in anterior stability were observed from 6 months up to 2 years after ACL reconstruction using the BPTB graft, whereas anterior laxity developed during the same period after ACL reconstruction using the HT graft. This is a Level IV, therapeutic case series study.

scholarly journals A Prospective Comparative Study Correlating the Efficacy of Biodegradable versus Metallic Interference Screw for Tibial Sided Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - A Unicentre Pilot Study in Jaipur, Rajasthan

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (18) ◽  
pp. 1258-1263
Author(s):  
Vishal Singh ◽  
Alokeshwar Sharma ◽  
Avinash Gundavarapu ◽  
Tejas Patel ◽  
Santosh Kumar M
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Interference Screw ◽  
Single Bundle ◽  
Interference Screws ◽  
Prospective Comparative Study ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Screw Group

BACKGROUND Traditionally, metallic interference screws were considered to have increased resistance to load than bio absorbable screws in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. We did a comparative evaluation of biodegradable and metallic interference screws for tibial sided ACL reconstruction and also analysed complications, compared clinical outcome, did imaging study of ACL single bundle reconstruction by using titanium & newer poly–L-lactic acid (PLLA) bio absorbable screws to determine as to whether bio absorbable screw which costs double the metallic screw, is functionally better than standard metallic screws. METHODS This is a prospective comparative study conducted among 50 patients aged between 15 and 55 years with clinical and MRI confirmation of complete ACL tear, treated arthroscopically with ACL reconstruction with either bio absorbable (group 1) or metallic (group 2) interference screw and both the groups were compared on follow up for an average duration of 12 months. Lysholm and Gillquist Knee Scoring Scale were used and outcome scores were divided into excellent, good, fair and poor. RESULTS In our study 41 patients were males and 9 were females. Bio screw was used in 24 males and 6 female patients. Metallic screw was used in 17 males and 3 females. Outcome score was excellent in 26 (52 %) cases, good in 18 (36 %) cases, fair in 4 (8 %) cases, poor in 2 (4 %) cases. The mean Lysholm score in bio absorbable group was 93.13 and in metallic group was 89.70. Knee effusion was higher in bio screw group and infection rate was higher in metallic group. CONCLUSIONS In our study, the difference between bio absorbable screw group and metallic screw group was insignificant with regard to final patient outcome. Final osseointegration was better with bio absorbable screw, but increased cost of implant and almost same results compared to metallic screw does not make the bio absorbable screw superior to its counterpart. KEYWORDS ACL, Bio Absorbable Interference Screws, Metallic Interference Screws

scholarly journals SINGLE-LEG HOP TESTING AFTER ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION IS NOT PREDICTIVE OF GRAFT RUPTURE IN ADOLESCENT PATIENTS

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4_suppl3) ◽  
pp. 2325967120S0015
Author(s):  
Jie J Yao ◽  
Jordan Snetselaar ◽  
Gregory A. Schmale ◽  
Michael Saper
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
High Risk Population ◽  
Entire Cohort ◽  
Hop Tests ◽  
Graft Rupture ◽  
Adolescent Patients ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Safe return to sport (RTS) after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is difficult to determine in adolescent patients. Return of strength and dynamic knee stability can be assessed with functional single-leg hop testing as part of a formal RTS assessment. However, it is unclear whether performance during single-leg hop testing can predict future ACL graft rupture. Hypothesis/Purpose: To investigate differences in single-leg hop testing between adolescent patients who experienced a graft rupture after ACL reconstruction and those that did not. Methods: A retrospective review of adolescent patients whom underwent primary ACL reconstruction with a hamstring (HS) autograft identified 16 patients (10 girls, 6 boys) with single-leg hop testing data prior to graft failure. A nearest neighbor match algorithm was used to age-, sex-, surgeon-, and graft-match 16 patients without graft rupture. All patients followed a standardized rehabilitation protocol following surgery. As part of a formal RTS test, assessment of function and dynamic strength/stability was performed using 4 different single-leg hop tests: single hop for distance, triple hop for distance, triple crossover hop for distance, and timed hop. The recovery of muscle strength was defined by a limb symmetry index (LSI) ≥ 90%. Bivariate analyses were performed to compare the two groups. Results: The mean age of the entire cohort at the time of surgery was 14.6 ± 1.5 years. Patients completed their RTS test at 29.0 ± 5.4 weeks. There were no statistically significant differences in demographics, graft size, or time to RTS test between groups. There were no statistically significant differences in LSIs on the single hop (p=0.90), triple hop (p=0.36), crossover hop (p=0.41), or timed hop (p=0.48). The mean LSIs on each of the four hop tests were 92.3 ± 14.7, 95.1 ± 6.1, 95.8 ± 7.1, and 98.6 ± 7.9, respectively. Passing rates were similar between groups (p=0.54). Conclusion: Performance on single-leg hop tests 6 months after surgery is not predictive of graft rupture following ACL reconstruction with HS autograft in adolescent patients. Further investigation of alternative RTS measures and different time frames for testing in this high-risk population is needed.

Comparison of tunnel positions in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using computer navigation

2010 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. 1282-1289 ◽  
Author(s):  
James E. Voos ◽  
Volker Musahl ◽  
Travis G. Maak ◽  
Thomas L. Wickiewicz ◽  
Andrew D. Pearle
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Computer Navigation ◽  
Single Bundle ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Tunnel Positions
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document