Computed tomographic evaluation of bone tunnel enlargement following single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autograft

<p class="abstract">The purpose of this study is to evaluate tibial and femoral tunnel diameter following single bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and correlation between tunnel enlargement and clinical outcome. Twelve patients who underwent primary arthroscopic single bundle ACL reconstruction with hamstring graft were included in prospective case series. Preoperative clinical evaluation was performed using international knee documentation committee (IKDC) subjective score and grade, Tegner knee score and Lysholm knee score. Computed tomography (CT) evaluation of the femoral and tibial tunnels were done on post-operative day (POD) 1 and at a mean follow up of 9 months (range 7-12 months) and were compared with functional scores. Our study shows significant tibial and femoral tunnel enlargement on CT scan at 9 months (range 7-12 months) postoperatively. All the clinical evaluation scales showed improvement postoperatively. The mean average femoral tunnel diameter increased significantly (p&lt;0.001) from 8.17±0.57 to 9.08±0.660 (10%) and tibial tunnel diameter increased significantly (p&lt;0.001) from 8.08±0.669 to 9.07±0.601 (11%) postoperatively at a mean follow up of 9 months (range 7-12 months). No statistically significant difference between tunnel enlargement and clinical values were found. In our current prospective CT based study, we conclude use of extracortical fixation of femoral tunnel with stronger fixation of the tibial tunnel, tunnel orientation and anatomic fixation close to the joint line along with less aggressive rehabilitation protocol with use of extension knee brace may result in minimization of tunnel widening with quadrupled hamstring autograft.</p>

Outcome of Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Knee Joint Using Hamstring Autograft

One of the most common injuries during sports is anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. A number of surgical and rehabilitation techniques have been developed. ACL reconstruction is mainstay of treatment. Objective: In this study we are evaluating the outcome of ACL surgery. Design & Setting: Retrospective study Methodology: Data collection of all cases that underwent primary arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction performed. All patients were operated with same surgical technique using quadrupled hamstring autograft. Results: There was an overall male predominance (95.3%). Medical meniscal injury was found in 05 (24%) patients. Lateral Meniscus injury was found in 04(19%) patients. Adjustable length CSF device was used in 12 (57%) patients and fixed-loop CSF device in 9 (43%) patients. Conclusion: At two years, outcome of ACL reconstruction performed by one surgeon using same surgical technique with adjustable CSF device and absorbable tibial screw granted satisfactory clinical results in all patients. Rehabilitation played an important role in return to activities of daily living in all patients at final follow up. Keywords: Anterior Cruciate Ligament, Arthroscopy, Rehabilitation

Recovery After ACL Reconstruction in Male Versus Female Adolescents: A Matched, Sex-Based Cohort Analysis of 543 Patients

Background: Differences in postoperative recovery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) between men and women have been demonstrated in the adult population. Sex-based differences have been incompletely investigated in adolescents, which represent the subpopulation most affected by ACL injury. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to compare the 6-month postoperative functional recovery after ACLR between adolescent boys and girls. It was hypothesized that significant differences in postoperative strength, dynamic balance, and functional hop test performance would be seen between the sexes. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Included in this study were athletes aged 12 to 19 years with closed or closing growth plates who underwent ACLR with hamstring autograft between May 2014 and May 2018 at a single institution. All athletes had undergone strength and functional testing between 5 and 8 months postoperatively. Exclusion criteria were previous knee surgery (contralateral or ipsilateral knee), concomitant injury/surgery other than meniscal tear/repair, allograft supplementation, and incomplete medical records. The limb symmetry index (LSI) for strength (measured with handheld dynamometer), as well as dynamic Y-balance and functional hop test performance, was compared between groups. To account for differences in physical characteristics between the sexes, 1-way between-group multivariate analysis of covariance was used to analyze the data. Results: Overall, 543 patients (211 boys, 332 girls) were included. There was no significant difference in age, body mass index, incidence of concomitant meniscal pathology, use of regional anesthesia, or time to functional testing between cohorts. Female athletes demonstrated a statistically significantly greater deficit in quadriceps strength LSI compared with male athletes (boys, +3.4%; girls, –2.3%; P = .011). Both male and female athletes demonstrated 33% hamstring strength deficits, with no statistically significant sex-based differences in dynamic balance or functional hop testing. Conclusion: Female athletes demonstrated greater quadriceps strength deficits than male athletes at 6 months after ACLR with hamstring autograft. Severe hamstring strength deficits persisted in both male and female patients at this time point. The correlation of such deficits to risk of ACL retear warrants continued study in the adolescent population and may support a delay in return to sports, which has been suggested in the more recent literature.

Multimodal Analgesia Plus Intraoperative Hamstring Sheath Injection for Hamstring Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Reduces Postoperative Posterior Knee Pain But Does Not Reduce Postoperative Narcotic Requirements: A Double-Blind Randomized Control Trial (171)

Objectives: This study’s objective was to determine whether multimodal analgesia plus an injection of the hamstring sheath immediately following the harvest of the semitendinosus and gracilis tendons during hamstring autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) reduces postoperative pain. We hypothesized that multimodal analgesia plus a hamstring sheath injection of the harvest site for autograft hamstring ACLR reduces postoperative pain. Methods: The Institutional Review Board approved this study registered with ClinicalTrials.gov and identified by NCT01868425. This study was a single-center, surgeon stratified double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study from April 2013 to December 2017. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups, in a 1:1 ratio per surgeon, to receive either standard of care analgesia plus intra-operative hamstring sheath saline injection (Placebo group) or standard of care analgesia plus multimodal analgesia plus intraoperative hamstring sheath anesthetic injection (MA group) for patients undergoing ACLR with hamstring autograft. Eligible participants were adults aged 18 years to 55 years old consented for ACLR using hamstring tendon autograft. Contraindication to a femoral nerve block, allergy to protocol medications, nervous system disease, renal or hepatic impairment, history of opioid dependence or current narcotic use, significant psychiatric disease, pregnancy or lactating, a seizure disorder, history of postoperative nausea and vomiting, latex allergy, and clinically significant cardiac or pulmonary disease excluded patients for participation in this study. The primary endpoint was total postoperative opioid administration. Secondary endpoints included the patient’s subjective pain score for the posterior, anterior, and lateral side of the knee, postoperative nausea, sedation, and pruritus scores. Based on our preliminary data, we estimated the mean opioid for standard care will be 6.6 morphine equivalents with a standard deviation of 6.2 morphine equivalents. Testing the ability of multimodal analgesia to reduce opioid usage by at least 50%, a minimal sample size of 45 subjects per group was needed to achieve 80% power based on a one-tailed t-test and a significance level < 0.05. Student’s t-test compared outcomes between groups. Additionally, a linear regression model for was also used for the primary outcome with total opioid administration as the dependent variable in order to control for body mass index (BMI) and sex, providing an adjusted estimate of the difference between groups. Results: A total of 112 patients (Figure 1) met inclusion criteria and were randomized into the placebo group (n = 57) and MA group (n = 55). Demographic data demonstrated no significant differences between groups (Table 1). The primary analysis was postoperative opioid administration and included all patients randomly assigned to either group for opioid administration in the postoperative anesthetic care unit (PACU), however opioid administration in 24 hours after discharge was not recorded for five patients in the MA group, leaving 50 patients remaining for the per-protocol analyses. Secondary outcome data was not recorded for one patient in the placebo group leaving 56 patients remaining for the per-protocol analyses. The mean postoperative opioid needs (Table 2) for patients in the MA group (18.7 ± 13.14) was less than those in the placebo group (22.6 ± 11.15), although this was not statistically significant (p-value = 0.140). Secondary outcomes (Figure 2A) demonstrated a significant reduction in posterior knee pain postoperatively in the MA group (2.84 ± 2.25) compared to Placebo (3.56 ± 1.97; p-value = 0.0362). There were no significant differences in postoperative pain in the front or sides of the knee. Similarly, there were no significant differences in pruritis (MA: 0.26 ± 0.99 vs. Placebo: 0.696 ± 1.73; p-value = 0.2163), sedation (MA: 5.02 ± 2.29 vs. Placebo: 4.61 ± 2.16; p-value = 0.656), and nausea (MA: 1.16 ± 2.28 vs Placebo: 0.714 ± 1.72; p-value = 0.243) scores (Figure 2B). Conclusions: Multimodal analgesia plus hamstring sheath injection reduces postoperative patient reported posterior knee pain compared to placebo for patients undergoing ACLR using hamstring tendon autograft. However, multimodal analgesia plus a hamstring sheath injection does not reduce postoperative opioid requirements.

Higher Rate of Patellofemoral Problems After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction using Hamstring Autograft

Background: Patellofemoral problems are not uncommon among post-anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction patients. Hamstring autograft harvesting-related factor is one of the suspected causes. A lack of tibiofemoral internal rotation force due to strength deficit causes the patella tends to shift laterally. Purposes: Peroneus longus tendon has been proposed as an alternative graft source due to its adequate tensile strength and minimal donor site morbidity to the knee biomechanics, including the patellofemoral joint. This tendon does not cross the knee joint and thus does not affect patellofemoral alignment and biomechanics. This study aims to compare patellofemoral problems between hamstring and peroneus longus autograft harvested-patients following ACL reconstruction. Material and methods: Thirty-one subjects who underwent primary single-bundle ACL reconstruction between September 2018 and September 2019 and met the inclusion criteria were grouped into the hamstring group (n=16) and peroneus longus group (n=15). Both groups were evaluated retrospectively. The follow-up assessment was conducted on the phase II rehabilitation program. The assessed variables were pain, crepitus, and the Indonesian-validated Kujala score. Results: No significant differences in pain and crepitus were found between both groups. There were significant differences in the Kujala score between both groups (P < .001). The peroneus longus group reported an averagely higher score than the hamstring group. Conclusion: Single bundle ACL reconstruction using peroneus longus tendon autograft produces less patellofemoral symptoms and functional limitation than using hamstring tendon autograft.

Longitudinal Changes of Patellar Alignment Before and After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Hamstring Autograft

Background: Evidence has suggested that after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR), individuals exhibit patellar malalignment; however, it is unknown if patellar alignment changes over time. Purpose: To examine the longitudinal changes in patellar alignment before, 6 months after, and 3 years after ACLR and to compare these variations, if present, with patellar alignment in controls. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A total of 35 patients who had ACLR using hamstring autograft (19 male; age, 29.9 ± 7.7 years; body mass index, 23.8 ± 2.5) and 20 controls (13 male; age, 30.4 ± 4.8 years; body mass index, 24.3 ± 2.7) participated. All patients underwent bilateral knee magnetic resonance imaging with the knee in extension and 30° of flexion using sagittal T2-weighted, fat-saturated fast spin-echo images to assess patellar alignment in 6 degrees of freedom: anterior-posterior, medial-lateral, and superior-inferior translations; flexion; tilt; and spin. Patients who had ACLR were assessed before (ACL-deficient state) and 6 months and 3 years after ACLR, while control participants were only assessed once. One-way repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to examine patellar alignment across time in the ACLR group. If changes were present, the independent t test was carried out to examine the differences between ACLR knees and control knees. Results: In the knee-extended condition, greater patellar lateral displacement was observed at the ACL-deficient state and 6 months after ACLR compared with 3 years after ACLR within the ACLR group ( P < .001 and P = .043, respectively) and compared with the control group ( P = .001 and P = .039, respectively). Greater patellar lateral tilt was observed at the ACL-deficient state compared with 3 years after ACLR ( P = .003) and compared with the control group ( P = .018). In the knee-flexed condition, greater anterior displacement was observed at the ACL-deficient state compared with 3 years after ACLR ( P = .001) and compared with the control group ( P = .011), and it was also observed at 6 months after ACLR compared with the control group ( P = .019). Less lateral spin was observed at the ACL-deficient state ( P = .042) and 6 months after ACLR ( P = .004) compared with 3 years after ACLR and compared with the control group ( P = .004 for both). No patellar alignment measures in the ACLR knees at 3 years were significantly different from those of the controls. Conclusion: Patellar malalignment in individuals before and after ACLR subjected to longitudinal changes, and the differences in alignment between ACLR and controls diminished over 3 years.

Reduction in Diameter of Hamstring Autograft With Additional Circumferential Preconditioning During ACL Reconstruction in a Pediatric Population

Background: Over 130,000 anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions (ACLRs) are performed annually in the United States. Previous studies have shown that circumferential preconditioning reduces the diameter of fresh-frozen allografts, but no studies have described the effect in ACL autografts used during ACLR. Purpose: To characterize the changes in the hamstring autograft diameter as a result of preparatory circumferential preconditioning. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A total of 135 patients with ACLR, with a median age of 15 years (interquartile range, 14-16 years; 50.4% boys), were identified in 2 pediatric hospitals. Three orthopaedic surgeons recorded hamstring autograft diameters at 2 time points during graft preparation. Hamstring tendons were prepared using a standardized procedure, tensioned to 15 to 20 lbs, and measured using cylindrical sizing guides. The graft was left with passive compression in the smallest initial rigid sizing guide for 10 minutes on both the tibial and femoral sides and then measured again immediately before implantation. Tunnels were drilled based on the second measurement of graft size. Comparisons were made between the graft diameter before and after circumferential preconditioning. A random-effects regression model and a linear regression model were performed to capture any unexplained variance on the linear predictor scale and determine correlations between demographics and graft characteristics. Results: The median initial diameter for both femoral and tibial sides was 9.5 mm. After longitudinal tension and circumferential preconditioning, the median autograft diameter of both sides decreased by 1 mm ( P < .001) to 8.5 mm. In the random-effects model, decreased patient height was a significant predictor of greater reduction in graft diameter. Increased height was a significant predictor for greater initial graft diameter (average beta coefficient = 3.08; P < .01). No intraoperative complications were noted with implantation of the preconditioned grafts in smaller diameter tunnels. Conclusion: The median diameter of hamstring ACL autografts decreases by 1 mm after circumferential preconditioning within standard cylindrical sizing guides. This allowed for drilling of tunnels that were an average of 1 mm smaller without any noted intraoperative complications with graft insertion.

Graft Failure in Adolescent Patients Undergoing Adult-Type ACL Reconstruction with Bone Patellar Tendon Bone or Hamstring Autograft

Introduction: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries represent a quarter of high school knee injuries. Adult-type ACL reconstruction (ACL-R) is the treatment of choice for skeletally mature adolescent patients with a complete ACL tear. Graft choice is individualized to the patient, taking into account the patient’s anatomy, activity level, and athletic participation. This subset of patients is at perhaps the highest risk of failure due to demands on the reconstruction after surgery. Hypothesis/Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes including graft rupture between bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) versus hamstring autograft in adolescent patients undergoing adult-type ACL reconstruction. Methods: A retrospective review of patients under the age of 21 undergoing primary adult-type ACL-R by a single surgeon using BTB or hamstring autograft between 2011 and 2019 was performed. Patient demographics, athletic participation, concomitant injuries, graft utilized, graft size, femoral and tibial fixation devices, compliance with rehabilitation protocol, complications, and rates of revision surgery were evaluated. Factors associated with graft failure were compared using Fisher’s exact test with statistical significance < 0.05. Results: 269 patients with an average age of 16.5 years (range 12.4-20.6) and an average follow-up of 2.1 years (range 0.4-6.6 years) were included. 52.5% of the patients were female. The overall graft rupture rate was 4.8%. There was no difference in average age, sex, compliance, and participation in high risk sports between graft type groups. Graft size was larger in patients with BTB autograft than patients with hamstring autograft (9.0 vs. 8.3; p<.001). There was no difference in the overall rate of re-operation between BTB and hamstring autografts (8.6% vs. 10.6%; p=0.81). There was no significant difference in rate of graft rupture with BTB and hamstring autograft (2.9% vs. 5.5%; p=0.26). Average time to revision surgery in those with ruptures was 1.7 years (range 0.7-4.7 years). 46% of patients had revision ACL-R with a different surgeon. There was no difference in age or participation in high risk sports between patients with and without graft tear. There was a higher percentage of documented compliance issues in patients with graft tear (46%) than without graft tear (29%), though not statistically significant (p=0.17). Conclusion: Rates of graft tear after ACL-R did not differ with BTB versus hamstring autograft. Rates of compliance and participation in high risk sports did not significantly differ in patients with and without graft tear. Many patients had a change in surgical provider for revision surgery.