scholarly journals Stability Outcomes following Computer-Assisted ACL Reconstruction

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Melissa A. Christino ◽  
Bryan G. Vopat ◽  
Alexander Mayer ◽  
Andrew P. Matson ◽  
Steven E. Reinert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Rotation ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Single Bundle ◽  
Anterior Instability ◽  
Knee Stability ◽  
Anterior Translation ◽  
Stability Measurements

Purpose. The purpose of this study was to determine whether intraoperative prereconstruction stability measurements and/or patient characteristics were associated with final knee stability after computer-assisted ACL reconstruction.Methods. This was a retrospective review of all patients who underwent computer-assisted single-bundle ACL reconstruction by a single surgeon. Prereconstruction intraoperative stability measurements were correlated with patient characteristics and postreconstruction stability measurements. 143 patients were included (87 male and 56 female). Average age was 29.8 years (SD ± 11.8).Results. Females were found to have significantly more pre- and postreconstruction internal rotation than males (P< 0.001 andP= 0.001, resp.). Patients with additional intra-articular injuries demonstrated more prereconstruction anterior instability than patients with isolated ACL tears (P< 0.001). After reconstruction, these patients also had higher residual anterior translation (P= 0.01). Among all patients with ACL reconstructions, the percent of correction of anterior translation was found to be significantly higher than the percent of correction for internal or external rotation (P< 0.001).Conclusion. Anterior translation was corrected the most using a single-bundle ACL reconstruction. Females had higher pre- and postoperative internal rotation. Patients with additional injuries had greater original anterior translation and less operative correction of anterior translation compared to patients with isolated ACL tears.

scholarly journals Adolescent differences in knee stability following computer-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa A. Christino ◽  
Bryan G. Vopat ◽  
Gregory R. Waryasz ◽  
Alexander Mayer ◽  
Steven E. Reinert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Internal Rotation ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Computer Navigation ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Single Bundle ◽  
Knee Stability ◽  
Adolescent Patients ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

<div class="page" title="Page 1"><div class="section"><div class="layoutArea"><div class="column"><p><span>Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery is being increasingly performed in the adolescent population. Computer navigation offers a reliable way to quantitatively measure knee stability during ACL reconstruction. A retrospective review of all adolescent patients (&lt;18 years old) who underwent computer-assisted primary single bundle ACL reconstruction by a single surgeon from 2007 to 2012 was performed. The average age was 15.8 years (SD 3.3). Female adolescents were found to have higher internal rotation than male adolescents both pre- (25.6° </span><em>vs </em><span>21.7°, P=0.026) and post-reconstruction (20.1° </span><em>vs </em><span>15.1°, P=0.005). Compared to adults, adolescents demonstrated significantly higher internal rotation both pre- (23.3° </span><em>vs </em><span>21.5°, P=0.047) and post-reconstruction (17.1° </span><em>vs </em><span>14.4°, P=0.003). They also had higher total rotation both pre- (40.9° </span><em>vs </em><span>38.4°, P=0.02) and post-reconstruction when compared to adults (31.56° </span><em>vs </em><span>28.67°, P=0.005). In adolescent patients, anterior translation was corrected more than rotation. Females had higher pre- and residual post-reconstruction internal rotation compared to males. When compared to adults, adolescents had increased internal rotation and total rotation both pre- and post-reconstruction. </span></p></div></div></div></div>

scholarly journals Influence of the Anterolateral Ligament on Knee Laxity: A Biomechanical Cadaveric Study Measuring Knee Kinematics in 6 Degrees of Freedom Using Dynamic Radiostereometric Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (8) ◽  
pp. 232596711878969 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emil Toft Nielsen ◽  
Kasper Stentz-Olesen ◽  
Sepp de Raedt ◽  
Peter Bo Jørgensen ◽  
Ole Gade Sørensen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Rotation ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Knee Flexion ◽  
Degrees Of Freedom ◽  
Knee Kinematics ◽  
Knee Laxity ◽  
Anterolateral Ligament ◽  
Single Bundle ◽  
Anterior Translation ◽  
6 Degrees Of Freedom

Background: An anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture often occurs during rotational trauma to the knee and may be associated with damage to extracapsular knee rotation–stabilizing structures such as the anterolateral ligament (ALL). Purpose: To investigate ex vivo knee laxity in 6 degrees of freedom with and without ALL reconstruction as a supplement to ACL reconstruction. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Cadaveric knees (N = 8) were analyzed using dynamic radiostereometry during a controlled pivotlike dynamic movement simulated by motorized knee flexion (0° to 60°) with 4-N·m internal rotation torque. We tested the cadaveric specimens in 5 successive ligament situations: intact, ACL lesion, ACL + ALL lesion, ACL reconstruction, and ACL + ALL reconstruction. Anatomic single-bundle reconstruction methods were used for both the ACL and the ALL, with a bone-tendon quadriceps autograft and gracilis tendon autograft, respectively. Three-dimensional kinematics and articular surface interactions were used to determine knee laxity. Results: For the entire knee flexion motion, an ACL + ALL lesion increased the mean knee laxity ( P < .005) for internal rotation (2.54°), anterior translation (1.68 mm), and varus rotation (0.53°). Augmented ALL reconstruction reduced knee laxity for anterior translation ( P = .003) and varus rotation ( P = .047) compared with ACL + ALL–deficient knees. Knees with ACL + ALL lesions had more internal rotation ( P < .001) and anterior translation ( P < .045) at knee flexion angles below 40° and 30°, respectively, compared with healthy knees. Combined ACL + ALL reconstruction did not completely restore native kinematics/laxity at flexion angles below 10° for anterior translation and below 20° for internal rotation ( P < .035). ACL + ALL reconstruction was not found to overconstrain the knee joint. Conclusion: Augmented ALL reconstruction with ACL reconstruction in a cadaveric setting reduces internal rotation, varus rotation, and anterior translation knee laxity similar to knee kinematics with intact ligaments, except at knee flexion angles between 0° and 20°. Clinical Relevance: Patients with ACL injuries can potentially achieve better results with augmented ALL reconstruction along with ACL reconstruction than with stand-alone ACL reconstruction. Furthermore, dynamic radiostereometry provides the opportunity to examine clinical patients and compare the recontructed knee with the contralateral knee in 6 degrees of freedom.

Medial Posterior Capsular Plication Reduces Anterior Shoulder Instability Similar to Remplissage Without Restricting Motion in the Setting of an Engaging Hill-Sachs Defect

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (9) ◽  
pp. 1982-1989 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian C. Werner ◽  
Xiang Chen ◽  
Christopher L. Camp ◽  
Andreas Kontaxis ◽  
Joshua S. Dines ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Rotation ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Biomechanical Testing ◽  
Bankart Repair ◽  
Anterior Shoulder Instability ◽  
Anterior Translation ◽  
Capsular Plication ◽  
Fresh Frozen ◽  
Surgical Options ◽  
Joint Loads

Background: Numerous surgical options for the management of engaging Hill-Sachs lesions exist, of which remplissage has emerged as one of the most popular arthroscopic techniques. Remplissage is not without disadvantages, however, and has been demonstrated to potentially result in a loss of external rotation (ER) due to nonanatomic tethering of the infraspinatus tendon and a potential decrease in infraspinatus strength clinically. Purpose: The efficacy of posterior medial capsular plication in addition to Bankart repair was examined as an arthroscopic management strategy for an engaging Hill-Sachs defect. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Eight fresh-frozen human cadaveric shoulders were utilized for the study. After testing baseline translation and motion, 30% Hill-Sachs lesions were created in each specimen. Three experimental groups were assembled: (1) isolated Bankart repair (HSD), (2) Bankart repair with remplissage (RM), and (3) Bankart repair with posterior medial capsular plication (PL). Biomechanical testing was performed to determine anterior translation, range of motion, and Hill-Sachs engagement. Translation and motion measurements were normalized to the baseline laxity values for each specimen. Results: A significant reduction in anterior translation was noted at 60° of abduction and 60° of ER for both the PL and RM groups compared with the HSD group throughout most of the joint loads tested ( P < .05), but no significant differences were noted between the PL and RM groups at any load. The RM group had significantly less normalized ER at 60° of abduction compared with the HSD and PL groups ( P < .05). There were no differences in internal rotation between the groups. All 8 specimens in the HSD group engaged, while no specimens in the RM and PL groups engaged ( P < .001). Conclusion: In a cadaveric model, medial posterior capsular plication as an adjunct to Bankart repair offers similar resistance to anterior translation and Hill-Sachs engagement as compared with remplissage in the setting of an engaging Hill-Sachs defect. Medial posterior capsular plication results in less restriction of ER compared with remplissage without any significant limitation of internal rotation. Clinical Relevance: Posterior medial capsular plication reduces translation and engagement similarly to remplissage, without any restriction in motion.

scholarly journals The Influence of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Remnant on Postoperative Clinical Results in Patients with Remnant Preserving Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 624-629 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan Goce Andonovski ◽  
Sonja Topuzovska ◽  
Milan Samardziski ◽  
Zoran Bozinovski ◽  
Biljana Andonovska ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Single Bundle ◽  
Knee Stability ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Proprioceptive Function

BACKGROUND: Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) remnants have important biomechanical, vascular and proprioceptive function.AIM: To determine the influence of the ACL residual remnants after partial and complete ACL ruptures on postoperative clinical results in patients with remnant preserving ACL reconstruction.PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 66 patients divided into two groups. In patients from the investigation group remnant preserving ACL reconstruction was performed, in patients from the control group single bundle ACL reconstruction was performed. The results were assessed by Rolimeter measurements, Lysholm and Tegner scores and proprioception evaluation.RESULTS: The mean side-to-side difference of anterior tibia displacement (mm) was improved from 4.4 ± 1.06 to 0.4 ± 0.7 in the investigation group, and from 4.6 ± 0.68 to 1.9 ± 0.64 in the control group (p < 0.001). Difference in the angles in which the knee was placed by the device and the patient has improved from 1.5 ± 0.96° to 0.5 ± 0.53° in the investigation group and from 1.8 ± 0.78° to 1.3 ± 0.97° in the control group (p < 0.05).  Tegner and Lysholm scores showed no difference between the groups.CONCLUSION: Preservation of the ACL residual bundle provides a better knee stability and proprioceptive function.

Is an Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Required in ACL-Reconstructed Knees With Associated Injury to the Anterolateral Structures? A Robotic Analysis of Rotational Knee Stability

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 1018-1027 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank R. Noyes ◽  
Lauren E. Huser ◽  
Darin Jurgensmeier ◽  
James Walsh ◽  
Martin S. Levy
Keyword(s):  
Internal Rotation ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Pivot Shift ◽  
Anterolateral Ligament ◽  
Rotational Stability ◽  
Iliotibial Band ◽  
Pivot Shift Test ◽  
Knee Stability ◽  
Acl Graft ◽  
Tibial Translation

Background: The effect of an anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction on rotational knee stability and corresponding anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft forces using multiple knee loading conditions including the pivot-shift phenomenon has not been determined. Purpose: First, to determine the rotational stability and ACL graft forces provided by an anatomic bone–patellar tendon–bone ACL reconstruction in the ACL-deficient knee alone and with an associated ALL/iliotibial band (ITB) injury. Second, to determine the added rotational stabilizing effect and reduction in ACL graft forces provided by an ALL reconstruction. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: A 6 degrees of freedom robotic simulator was used to test 7 fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens during 5 testing conditions: intact, ACL-sectioned, ACL-reconstructed, ALL/ITB-sectioned, and ALL-reconstructed. Lateral and medial tibiofemoral compartment translations and internal tibial rotations were measured under Lachman test conditions, 5-N·m internal rotation, and 2 pivot-shift simulations. Statistical equivalence within 2 mm and 2° was defined as P < .05. Results: Single-graft ACL reconstruction restored central tibial translation under Lachman testing and internal rotation under 5-N·m internal rotation torque ( P < .05). A modest increase in internal rotation under 5-N·m internal rotation torque occurred after ALL/ITB sectioning of 5.1° (95% CI, 3.6° to 6.7°) and 6.7° (95% CI, 4.3° to 9.1°) at 60° and 90° of flexion, respectively ( P = .99). Lateral compartment translation increases in the pivot-shift tests were <2 mm. ALL reconstruction restored internal rotation within 0.5° (95% CI, –1.9° to 2.9°) and 0.7° (95% CI, –2.0° to 3.4°) of the ACL-reconstructed state at 60° and 90° of flexion, respectively ( P < .05). The ALL procedure reduced ACL graft forces, at most, 75 N in the pivot-shift tests and 81 N in the internal rotation tests. Conclusion: Although the ALL reconstruction corrected the small abnormal changes in the internal rotation limit at high flexion angles, the procedure had no effect in limiting tibiofemoral compartment translations in the pivot-shift test and produced only modest decreases in ACL graft forces. Accordingly, the recommendation to perform an ALL reconstruction to correct pivot-shift abnormalities is questioned. Clinical Relevance: The small changes in rotational stability after ALL/ITB sectioning would not seem to warrant the routine addition of an ALL reconstruction in primary ACL injuries. Clinical exceptions may exist, as in grossly unstable grade 3 pivot-shift knees and revision knees. However, the concern exists of overconstraining normal tibial rotations.

3D CT analysis of femoral and tibial tunnel positions after modified transtibial single bundle ACL reconstruction with varus and internal rotation of the tibia

The Knee ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 272-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoon-Seok Youm ◽  
Sung-Do Cho ◽  
Jin Eo ◽  
Ki-Jae Lee ◽  
Kwang-Hwan Jung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Rotation ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Tibial Tunnel ◽  
Single Bundle ◽  
3D Ct ◽  
Ct Analysis ◽  
Tunnel Positions

ULTRASONIC EVALUATION OF ANTERIOR SHOULDER TRANSLATION IN NORMAL SHOULDERS

2003 ◽  
Vol 07 (02) ◽  
pp. 125-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joo Seng Yeap ◽  
Alison H. McGregor ◽  
Keith Humphries ◽  
Andrew L. Wallace
Keyword(s):  
Internal Rotation ◽  
Humeral Head ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Observer Variation ◽  
Present Moment ◽  
Anterior Translation ◽  
Ultrasonic Evaluation ◽  
Displacement Force ◽  
The Right

Anterior translation in the right shoulders of 23 volunteers was evaluated using ultrasound from an anterior approach with a 10 MHz, 6 cm wide linear transducer. A translatory force of 90 N was used to translate the humeral head in the adduction and internal rotation position, while a translatory force of 60 N was used in the more clinically relevant position of 90° abduction and external rotation position. The overall intra-observer coefficients of variation ranged from 0–13.0% (mean 3.8 ± 2.5%) for examiner I and 0.5–20.9% (mean 5.1 ± 3.9%) for examiner II. The overall inter-observer variation ranged from 0–29.8% (mean 9.3 ± 7.3%). The anterior translation of the humeral head in adduction and internal rotation following 90 N displacement force ranged from -2.6 to 12.9 mm (mean 2.1 ± 3.1 mm) for examiner I and from -4.1 to 4.7 mm (mean 1.1 ± 2.2 mm) for examiner II. The anterior translation of the humeral head in abduction and external rotation following 60 N displacement force ranged from -3.3 to 3.7 mm (mean 0.3 ± 1.9 mm) for examiner I and from -8.3 mm to 4.5 mm (mean -0.7 ± 2.6 mm) for examiner II. The intra-class correlation coefficients (r) for the measured anterior translation between the two examiners for the 2 positions were 0.029 and -0.058 respectively. We concluded that the inter-observer coefficient of variation remained excessive and the agreement in the measured anterior translation between the two examiners was poor. The finding of negative values in the measured anterior translation despite the use of 90 N and 60 N translatory force raises further concerns about the prospective clinical use of this technique at the present moment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document