scholarly journals Religious slaughter and animal welfare: data from an online consultation

2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (5) ◽  
pp. 27
Author(s):  
C. Baldinelli ◽  
P. Sechi ◽  
V. Cambiotti ◽  
S. Parmegiani ◽  
B.T. Cenci Goga
2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paola Sechi ◽  
Chiara Baldinelli ◽  
Maria F. Iulietto ◽  
Beniamino T. Cenci Goga

This paper analyses data obtained from an online survey related to animal welfare and religious slaughter topics. The questionnaire was conducted with the purpose of examining the purchase behaviour of a group of consumers (with different religious orientation) and their views on animal protection and ritual slaughter. The main results of the consultation were two. The first evidenced the respondents’ great interest about the question on animal welfare, which is in accordance with the growing interest of European citizens concerning this issue. The second was the demand for a more transparent labelling of animal products, which would also reflect animal welfare and the slaughter method used. These results are in contrast with marketing analysis, which finds that consumers want to only receive positive information. Paradoxically, the more information is transmitted to reassure consumers, the higher is the risk to alarm them.


2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 162-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Federico Zuolo

Most contemporary Western laws regarding the treatment of animals in livestock farming and animal slaughter are primarily concerned with the principle that animal suffering during slaughter should be minimized, but that animal life may be taken for legitimate human purposes. This principle seems to be widely shared, intuitively appealing and capable of striking a good compromise between competing interests. But is this principle consistent? And how can it be normatively grounded? In this paper I discuss critically this principle (the priority of the minimization of animal suffering over animals’ right to life). I argue that this principle can be justified on the ground of respect for the value commitment toward animal welfare, which is held by many people. The advantage of this perspective is its inclusiveness: it can justify without contradiction the principle at stake and allow for the admissibility of religious slaughter while promoting animals’ interest in not suffering. This justification also has the advantage of being compatible with the cultural and religious pluralism of contemporary societies.


2013 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 459-488 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beniamino T. Cenci-Goga ◽  
Giuseppe De Angelis ◽  
Roberto Pezzato ◽  
Roberto Rossi ◽  
Antonio Poeta ◽  
...  

Animals ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 1530
Author(s):  
Jessica Loyer ◽  
Alexandra L. Whittaker ◽  
Emily A. Buddle ◽  
Rachel A. Ankeny

While religious slaughter is not a new practice in Australia, it has recently attracted public concern regarding questions of animal welfare following unfavourable media coverage. However, the details of religious slaughter practices, including related animal welfare provisions, appear to be poorly understood by the Australian public, and no existing literature concisely synthesises current regulations, practices, and issues. This paper addresses this gap by examining the processes associated with various types of religious slaughter and associated animal welfare issues, by reviewing the relevant legislation and examining public views, while highlighting areas for further research, particularly in Australia. The paper finds shortcomings in relation to transparency and understanding of current practices and regulation and suggests a need for more clear and consistent legislative provisions, as well as increased independence from industry in the setting of the standards, enforcement and administration of religious slaughter. A starting point for legal reform would be the relocation of important provisions pertaining to religious slaughter from delegated codes to the responsible act or regulation, ensuring proper parliamentary oversight. In addition, more active public engagement must occur, particularly with regard to what constitutes legal practices and animal welfare standards in the Australian context to overcome ongoing conflict between those who oppose religious slaughter and the Muslim and Jewish communities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document