ATTRACTION OF RHAGOLETIS FLIES (DIPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE) TO RED SPHERES OF DIFFERENT SIZES

1977 ◽  
Vol 109 (4) ◽  
pp. 593-596 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald J. Prokopy

AbstractWhen different size sticky-coated red spheres were positioned within the foliage canopy of sour cherry or apple trees, more Rhagoletis pomonella (Walsh) flies were always captured on 7.5-cm-diam. ones than on 3.4 or 1.5 cm ones. Early in the season, 7.5 cm spheres attracted fewer or about as many R. pomonella as 23 cm spheres, but later on, 7.5 cm spheres always attracted more. R. fausta (Osten Sacken) and R. cingulata (Loew) flies were always more attracted to 7.5 cm spheres than to any other size tested. However, both these species showed a proportionately greater attraction to smaller spheres than did R. pomonella. The phenomena of super-normal stimuli and learning are proposed as possible explanations of certain of these findings.

2001 ◽  
Vol 133 (3) ◽  
pp. 355-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Rull ◽  
Ronald J. Prokopy

AbstractWe released marked mature male flies of the apple maggot, Rhagoletis pomonella (Walsh), inside and outside of square blocks of apple trees, Malus domestica Borkh. (Rosaceae), to test the effect of orchard structure on the interception of flies by odor-baited red-sphere traps. The blocks were composed of large trees planted at low density, medium-sized trees planted at medium density, or small trees planted at high density. The experiment was carried out in six commercial apple orchards during summer in 1997 and 1998. Released flies moving into blocks were intercepted in large proportions by baited perimeter traps, thus preventing fly penetration into sphere-protected blocks. In 1997, proportions of intercepted flies were higher for traps in blocks of small and medium-sized trees than for traps in blocks of large trees. In 1998, a year with an unusually low fruit load, interception remained high, but there were no differences in proportions of flies intercepted by perimeter traps among blocks of trees of different sizes. Overall we conclude that the tendency of apple growers in Massachusetts to replace large trees planted at low density with small or medium-sized trees planted at high or medium density will not adversely affect behavioral control programs for apple maggot flies. In fact, this practice may enhance the effectiveness of these programs through increased interception of immigrant adults.


1972 ◽  
Vol 104 (2) ◽  
pp. 257-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. G. Monteith

AbstractAdult apple maggots, Rhagoletis pomonella (Walsh), were relatively free from attacks by predators in southern Ontario. The main reason for this was the flies’ alert avoidance of approaching objects. In addition to this protection from predators, the flies appeared to be avoided by hunting spiders. Adults of the cherry fruit fly, Rhagoletis cinqulata (Loew), were equally alert and apparently free from predation while they were in apple trees.


1977 ◽  
Vol 109 (4) ◽  
pp. 631-634 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. H. Reissig

AbstractIn 1975, 19.4% of 6950 marked apple maggot adults, Rhagoletis pomonella, which were released in the center of a 7 × 7 array of unsprayed apple trees were recaptured on Pherocon® AM traps. The distribution of the marked flies was not uniform as most of the flies were recaptured near the release point. The distribution of native flies which migrated into the test area from adjacent infested apple trees was also non-uniform.


1973 ◽  
Vol 105 (6) ◽  
pp. 873-891 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald J. Prokopy ◽  
Guy L. Bush

AbstractThe results of systematically-conducted, mid- to late-season observations and experiments on large populations of apple maggot flies, Rhagoletis pomonella (Walsh), in apple and sour cherry trees revealed the following sequences in courtship behavior. When environmental conditions are favorable, sexually mature males and females fly to the host fruit, the site of assembly for mating and the site of oviposition. Either sex may initiate the flight which takes it to the particular fruit occupied by a member of the opposite sex. Such flights by males are often in response to the visual stimulus of a female (or male) moving about on a fruit, while such flights by females seem to be primarily in response to the fruit as a potential oviposition site. Once on the same fruit, a male and a female locate one another apparently solely through vision, particularly movement. They walk to within 1–3 cm of one another, but there is no tactile contact until such time as the male attempts copulation by jumping onto the back of the female from this distance.The position from which the copulatory jump is made is variable. Sometimes it is made from a face to face position, with one or both flies having waved its pictured wings at the other. Occasionally it is made from the side or from a flight from a nearby fruit directly onto a female’s abdomen. Most often however, it is made when a male is stimulated by the forward movement of a female, approaches her from the rear, and jumps onto her abdomen from the rear without the female having seen the male. Most copulation attempts, and especially most successful attempts, are initiated while the female is engaged in some phase of oviposition behavior. Males attempt copulation with other males just as often as with females, strongly suggesting that at least up until the time of tactile contact, males are unable to distinguish between the sexes. The fact that a number of male and female apple maggot flies was observed in copula with R. fausta flies in sour cherry trees suggests that neither sex may be able to discriminate too well between members of its own species and members of other species whose wing and body patterns are similar in appearance However males were usually, although not always, able to distinguish stable flies from apple maggot flies prior to tactile contact.We discuss the known and possible roles of various visual, chemical acoustical, and physical-tactile cues involved in the courtship behavior and suggest that the most important factor insuring reproductive isolation in apple maggot flies at the pre-copulatory stage may be the selection of the proper host plant for oviposition and hence for assembly for mating.


1985 ◽  
Vol 117 (5) ◽  
pp. 581-585 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald J. Prokopy

AbstractFrom 1981 to 1984, a low-spray management program was employed against injurious arthropods on the 40 disease-resistant apple trees in my experimental orchard in Massachusetts. The program consisted of an annual early-season application of petroleum oil followed by 2 applications of phosmet (1 at petal fall and another 10–14 days later). Visual traps were used to suppress Rhagoletis pomonella flies. For all years combined, a mean of 89.7% of fruit sampled at harvest in this orchard was free of insect injury compared with 0% uninjured fruit on neighboring unsprayed trees. Populations of foliar-feeding pests never reached injurious levels.


1993 ◽  
Vol 125 (3) ◽  
pp. 413-422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald J. Prokopy ◽  
Sylvia S. Cooley ◽  
Luis Galarza ◽  
Christopher Bergweiler ◽  
Carol R. Lauzon

AbstractPublished studies have shown inconsistent effects of proteinaceous bait sprays against apple maggot flies, Rhagoletis pomonella (Walsh). Explanations of inconsistency could involve the presence of natural food such as bird droppings competing with bait sprays for attraction of flies. Under field, semi-field, or laboratory conditions, we found that: (1) aqueous solutions of 10% proteinaceous bait (Nulure) were significantly more attractive than water to protein-denied but not to protein-provided apple maggot flies; (2) addition of 2% toxicant (malathion 50 EC) did not affect attractiveness of Nulure droplets but did significantly deter feeding by arriving protein-provided flies (though not protein-denied flies); (3) droppings collected from barn swallows, chickens, and unidentified birds on apple trees were significantly more attractive than solutions or droplets of Nulure to protein-denied flies; (4) droppings that were freshly deposited or fresh from cold storage were significantly less attractive than droppings held under ambient conditions for 1 or 2 days; (5) droppings allowed to dry for 1 day at 25 °C, 60% RH were no less attractive than droppings that received water to simulate dew or rainfall; and (6) droppings treated with antibiotics were significantly less attractive than droppings not treated with antibiotics, indicating that bacteria may be involved in generating attractive volatiles. Together, these findings suggest that in situations where natural sources of protein such as bird droppings or insect honeydew are abundant, apple maggot flies may be relatively unaffected by addition of proteinaceous bait to insecticide sprays.


1984 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 684-690 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. H. Reissig ◽  
R. W. Weires ◽  
C. G. Forshey ◽  
W. L. Roelofs ◽  
R. C. Lamb ◽  
...  

1980 ◽  
Vol 112 (12) ◽  
pp. 1319-1320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald J. Prokopy ◽  
Stewart H. Berlocher

The apple maggot, Rhagoletis pomonella (Walsh), is an indigenous North American insect whose principal native host is hawthome, Crataegus (Bush 1966). During the past ca. 120 years, this insect has expanded its host range to include fruits of the following introduced plants: apple, Malus sp. (Walsh 1867); domestic plum, Prunus sp. (Herrick 1920); sour cherry, Prunus cerasus L. (Shervis et al. 1970); apricot, Prunus armeniaca L. (Lienk 1970); and pear, Pyrus sp. (Prokopy and Bush 1972). Continuous populations have been established on apple and sour cherry, but apparently only occasional infestations occur on plum, apricot, and pear. Here, we report yet another new host of the apple maggot: the introduced rose hip, Rosa rugosa Thunberg


Weed Science ◽  
1976 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 425-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. R. Putnam

Glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine] was applied to selected areas on young apple (Malus sylvestrisL.), pear (Pyrus communisL.), sour cherry (Prunus cerasusL.), and peach [Prunus persica(L.) Patsch] trees to observe tree response. Injury occurred only on newly planted peach when contact was made on the basal 12.7 cm of tree trunks. Glyphosate effectively killed suckers without damaging trees. When sprays were applied to a lower branch of apple trees, local injury occurred the same season and the following year, but symptoms were not visible in other portions of the tree. Radiolabeled glyphosate was applied to the basal trunk, leaves, suckers, and fruit of 4-yr-old ‘MacSpur’/MM106 apple and 5-yr-old ‘Bartlett’/seedling pear. Applications on basal trunk areas produced no detectable radioactivity in leaves, buds, or fruits at harvest time. Applications on sucker leaves produced radioactivity only in the treated and adjacent sucker tissue and not in other portions of the tree. The14C-glyphosate moved readily from the treated leaves of lower branches to other leaves, buds, and developing fruit on the same branch but was not detectable in other areas of the tree. After 90 days, 92 to 98% of the extractable radioactivity in leaf, bud, or fruit tissue was unaltered14C-glyphosate.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document