The heterogeneous expression of MAGE-3 protein: difference between primary lesions and metastatic lymph nodes in gastric carcinoma.

1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
N Sadanaga ◽  
H Nagashima ◽  
K Tahara ◽  
Y Yoshikawa ◽  
M Mori
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Carcinoma ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Metastatic Lymph Nodes ◽  
Metastatic Lymph ◽  
Heterogeneous Expression

Endosonographic Diagnosis of Metastatic Lymph Nodes in Gastric Carcinoma

Endoscopy ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 24 (S 1) ◽  
pp. 315-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Aibe ◽  
H. Fujimura ◽  
H. Yanai ◽  
K. Okita ◽  
T. Takemoto
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Carcinoma ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Metastatic Lymph Nodes ◽  
Metastatic Lymph

The number of metastatic lymph nodes: a promising prognostic determinant for gastric carcinoma in the latest edition of the TNM classification

1998 ◽  
Vol 187 (6) ◽  
pp. 597-603 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasuhiro Kodera ◽  
Yoshitaka Yamamura ◽  
Yasuhiro Shimizu ◽  
Akihito Torii ◽  
Takashi Hirai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Carcinoma ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Tnm Classification ◽  
Metastatic Lymph Nodes ◽  
Metastatic Lymph

scholarly journals Significance of systemic lymphadenectomy in regard to the extent of metastatic lymph node involvement in patients operated for gastric carcinoma

2003 ◽  
Vol 56 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 451-456
Author(s):  
Dejan Stevanovic ◽  
Dragan Radovanovic ◽  
Ivan Pavlovic ◽  
Nebojsa Mitrovic ◽  
Milena Vukovic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lymph Node ◽  
Gastric Carcinoma ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Metastatic Lymph Node ◽  
Lymph Node Involvement ◽  
Metastatic Lymph Nodes ◽  
Stage Of Disease ◽  
Systematic Lymphadenectomy ◽  
Metastatic Lymph ◽  
Node Involvement

Introduction Formation of lymphatic metastasis is an important prognostic factor in treatment of gastric carcinoma. In this paper we would like to point to the importance of systematic lymphadenectomy in regard to extent of metastatic lymph node involvement in patients with gastric carcinoma. Material and methods This investigation included 114 patients with diagnosis of gastric carcinoma undergoing systematic lymphadenectomy. We analyzed metastatic lymph node involvement considering: 1. tumor localization; 2. histopathologic type; 3. depth of tumor invasion; 4. extent of lymph node resection; 5. stage of disease. Results In the course of this study, 2100 lymph nodes were extracted by systematic lymphadenectomy (18.42 lymph nodes per patient on average). Out of this number, about 27% of lymph nodes were involved with metastasis, and 60% of positive lymph nodes belonged to the first, 25.7% to the second, 10.2% to the third and 3.8% to the fourth drainaged group. The most frequent localization (over 56%) of tumors was the distal third region of stomach. Histopathologically, most common type of carcinoma was intestinal carcinoma, with metastasis in first and second drainage group. A great number of patients have tumors with infiltration of the serosa. Those patients had metastases in lymph nodes in over 42%. Most patients (58%) belonged to IV stage of disease and presented with highest number of involved metastatic lymph nodes in all drainage groups. Discussion In our patients high metastatic involvement of all four drainage groups of lymph nodes was established. Up to date standard lymphadenectomy (D1) which has been performed increased the length of survival of these patients. Conclusion By systematic lymphadenectomy we removed a great number of metastatic lymph nodes with beneficial effect on survival of patients with gastric carcinoma.

scholarly journals Discrimination of metastatic lymph nodes in patients with gastric carcinoma using diffusion-weighted imaging

2012 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 1436-1444 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin Cheng ◽  
Yi Wang ◽  
Jie Deng ◽  
Robert J. McCarthy ◽  
Gongwei Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Carcinoma ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Diffusion Weighted Imaging ◽  
Metastatic Lymph Nodes ◽  
Diffusion Weighted ◽  
Metastatic Lymph
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document