scholarly journals Fashion Studies Volume 3, Issue 1, Launch Panel Discussion

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shawkay Ottmann ◽  
Ellen Sampson ◽  
Philip Sparks ◽  
Cheryl Thompson
Keyword(s):  
Panel Discussion ◽  
Fashion Studies ◽  
Question And Answer

A panel discussion featuring four of our brilliant authors from this new issue: Shawkay Ottmann, Dr. Ellen Sampson, Philip Sparks, and Dr. Cheryl Thompson. This panel was moderated by the journal’s Co-Founders and Co-Editors, Dr. Ben Barry and Dr. Alison Matthews David, and includes a question and answer period with event guests.

Audit Quality in the Post-SOX Audit Environment: What Your Auditing Students Must Know about the PCAOB Inspection Process

2008 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. A17-A25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard R. Riley ◽  
J. Gregory Jenkins ◽  
Pamela Y. Roush ◽  
Jay C. Thibodeau
Keyword(s):  
Audit Quality ◽  
Panel Discussion ◽  
Case Material ◽  
Audit Process ◽  
Education Committee ◽  
Sarbanes Oxley ◽  
Auditing Standards ◽  
Question And Answer ◽  
Inspection Process

SUMMARY: At the American Accounting Association’s (AAA) Auditing Section Midyear Meeting in January 2007, the Education Committee organized a panel to discuss the educational issues that have surfaced as a result of the PCAOB inspection process. The discussion focused on changes that have occurred in the audit environment, particularly concerning audit documentation and the audit process, as a result of the PCAOB auditing standards and feedback to the firms from the PCAOB inspection process. The goal was to provide a forum for panelists to interact with educators, to develop suggestions to help prepare students for their careers in the post-Sarbanes-Oxley auditing environment. In this paper, we first provide an overview of the PCAOB inspection process and then provide a report on the actual panel discussion, which included a spirited question-and-answer session with the audience. We also incorporate the results of follow-up interviews with the three panelists that occurred in April 2008. Finally, we provide case material and other resources to assist professors as they incorporate the panelists’ suggestions related to PCAOB inspection issues in the classroom.

From the Editors

2008 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 258-260
Author(s):  
Steve Heilig
Keyword(s):  
Medical Treatment ◽  
Panel Discussion ◽  
Medical Futility ◽  
International Bioethics ◽  
Question And Answer ◽  
The One ◽  
The Right

At a large bioethics conference in the early 1990s, the International Bioethics Institute presented a panel discussion on the newly-hot issue of “medical futility.” Erudite experts held forth from various perspectives, with convincing if conflicting arguments. During the question-and-answer session that followed, however, one attendee gently offered the one remark most recalled from that session. He was, if memory serves, a Latino physician working near the Mexico/USA border. “Thank you for your presentations,” he said, apparently with great sincerity. “I learned a lot. But on behalf of my own patients, I would ask that before you give them the right to say ‘no’ to medical treatment, we first give them the option of saying ‘yes’.”

scholarly journals Review: Who’s In and Who’s Out of Fashion (Studies)?

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Jaclyn Marcus
Keyword(s):  
Case Studies ◽  
Art History ◽  
Doctoral Student ◽  
Annual Conference ◽  
Fashion Studies ◽  
Recent Growth ◽  
Interdisciplinary Nature ◽  
Question And Answer ◽  
College Art Association ◽  
Panel Review

Despite its relatively recent growth, the field of fashion studies is already known for its many transformations. This year’s College Art Association of America (CAA) Annual Conference featured an exciting new panel on the interdisciplinary nature of dress, entitled Who’s In and Who’s Out of Fashion (Studies)? Chaired by Sarah Scaturro, chief conservator at the Cleveland Museum of Art, and Ann Tartsinis, doctoral student at Stanford University’s Department of Art & Art History, the session addressed the question “Is there a correct or wrong way to do fashion studies?” and aimed to explore what is traditionally defined as “fashion studies” within the discipline. This panel review includes an introduction to the development of the field of fashion and dress, an overview of the topics and case studies presented during the session, and a question and answer session with the Co-Chairs of the panel.

Panel Discussion #1

1996 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 87S-90S
Author(s):  
M Myers
Keyword(s):  
Panel Discussion

QUESTION AND ANSWER

1972 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 234-234
Author(s):  
DAVID FREIDES
Keyword(s):  
Question And Answer
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document