scholarly journals Large Incidence-free Sets in Geometries

10.37236/2831 ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefaan De Winter ◽  
Jeroen Schillewaert ◽  
Jacques Verstraete

Let $\Pi = (P,L,I)$ denote a rank two geometry. In this paper, we are interested in the largest value of $|X||Y|$ where $X \subset P$ and $Y \subset L$ are sets such that $(X \times Y) \cap I = \emptyset$. Let $\alpha(\Pi)$ denote this value. We concentrate on the case where $P$ is the point set of $\mathsf{PG}(n,q)$ and $L$ is the set of $k$-spaces in $\mathsf{PG}(n,q)$. In the case that $\Pi$ is the projective plane $\mathsf{PG}(2,q)$, where $P$ is the set of points and $L$ is the set of lines of the projective plane, Haemers proved that maximal arcs in projective planes together with the set of lines not intersecting the maximal arc determine $\alpha(\mathsf{PG}(2,q))$ when $q$ is an even power of $2$. Therefore, in those cases,\[ \alpha(\Pi) = q(q - \sqrt{q} + 1)^2.\] We give both a short combinatorial proof and a linear algebraic proof of this result, and consider the analogous problem in generalized polygons. More generally, if $P$ is the point set of $\mathsf{PG}(n,q)$ and $L$ is the set of $k$-spaces in $\mathsf{PG}(n,q)$, where $1 \leq k \leq n - 1$, and $\Pi_q = (P,L,I)$, then we show as $q \rightarrow \infty$ that \[ \frac{1}{4}q^{(k + 2)(n - k)} \lesssim \alpha(\Pi) \lesssim q^{(k + 2)(n - k)}.\] The upper bounds are proved by combinatorial and spectral techniques. This leaves the open question as to the smallest possible value of $\alpha(\Pi)$ for each value of $k$. We prove that if for each $N \in \mathbb N$, $\Pi_N$ is a partial linear space with $N$ points and $N$ lines, then $\alpha(\Pi_N) \gtrsim \frac{1}{e}N^{3/2}$ as $N \rightarrow \infty$.

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 345-351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mustafa Gezek ◽  
Vladimir D. Tonchev ◽  
Tim Wagner

Abstract The resolutions and maximal sets of compatible resolutions of all 2-(120,8,1) designs arising from maximal (120,8)-arcs, and the 2-(52,4,1) designs arising from previously known maximal (52,4)-arcs, as well as some newly discovered maximal (52,4)-arcs in the known projective planes of order 16, are computed. It is shown that each 2-(120,8,1) design associated with a maximal (120,8)-arc is embeddable in a unique way in a projective plane of order 16. This result suggests a possible strengthening of the Bose–Shrikhande theorem about the embeddability of the complement of a hyperoval in a projective plane of even order. The computations of the maximal sets of compatible resolutions of the 2-(52,4,1) designs associated with maximal (52,4)-arcs show that five of the known projective planes of order 16 contain maximal arcs whose associated designs are embeddable in two nonisomorphic planes of order 16.


10.37236/9008 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mustafa Gezek ◽  
Rudi Mathon ◽  
Vladimir D. Tonchev

In this paper we consider binary linear codes spanned by incidence matrices of Steiner 2-designs associated with maximal arcs in projective planes of even order, and their dual codes. Upper and lower bounds on the 2-rank of the incidence matrices are derived. A lower bound on the minimum distance of the dual codes is proved, and it is shown that the bound is achieved if and only if the related maximal arc contains a hyperoval of the plane. The  binary linear codes of length 52 spanned by the incidence matrices of 2-$(52,4,1)$ designs associated with previously known and some newly found maximal arcs of degree 4 in projective planes of order 16 are analyzed and classified up to equivalence. The classification shows that some designs associated with maximal arcs in nonisomorphic planes generate equivalent codes. This phenomenon establishes new links between several of the known planes. A conjecture concerning the codes of maximal arcs in $PG(2,2^m)$ is formulated.


CAUCHY ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 131
Author(s):  
Vira Hari Krisnawati ◽  
Corina Karim

<p class="abstract"><span lang="IN">In combinatorial mathematics, a Steiner system is a type of block design. Specifically, a Steiner system <em>S</em>(<em>t</em>, <em>k</em>, <em>v</em>) is a set of <em>v</em> points and <em>k</em> blocks which satisfy that every <em>t</em>-subset of <em>v</em>-set of points appear in the unique block. It is well-known that a finite projective plane is one examples of Steiner system with <em>t</em> = 2, which consists of a set of points and lines together with an incidence relation between them and order 2 is the smallest order.</span></p><p class="abstract"><span lang="IN">In this paper, we observe some properties from construction of finite projective planes of order 2 and 3. Also, we analyse the intersection between two projective planes by using some characteristics of the construction and orbit of projective planes over some representative cosets from automorphism group in the appropriate symmetric group.</span></p>


1969 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. 1462-1476 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. F. Rigby

A projective plane consists of a set of points and a set of lines, together with a relation of incidence between points and lines, such that(i) any two distinct points P, Q are incident with a unique line PQ,(ii) any two distinct lines p, q are incident with a unique point p ∩ q,(iii) there exist four points, no three of which are incident with the same line.We shall use the usual geometrical terminology.An oval in a projective plane π is a set of points of π such that:(i) no three points of are collinear; this means that a line of π is either a secant of , containing two points of , or a tangent of , containing just one point of , or a non-secant of , containing no point of ;


1964 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. 379-385 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reuben Sandler

In 1945, L. I. Kopejkina (4), at the suggestion of A. G. Kurosh, began a programme of studying the properties of free projective planes and the analogies between free planes and free groups. In this paper, this study will be extended by proving a tool theorem and several of its consequences. The theorem deals with the existence of "minimal free generators" for subplanes of free planes.A set of points and lines and an incidence relation are said to form a projective plane if the following three axioms are satisfied.


10.37236/2582 ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamás Héger ◽  
Marcella Takáts

In a graph $\Gamma=(V,E)$ a vertex $v$ is resolved by a vertex-set $S=\{v_1,\ldots,v_n\}$ if its (ordered) distance list with respect to $S$, $(d(v,v_1),\ldots,d(v,v_n))$, is unique. A set $A\subset V$ is resolved by $S$ if all its elements are resolved by $S$. $S$ is a resolving set in $\Gamma$ if it resolves $V$. The metric dimension of $\Gamma$ is the size of the smallest resolving set in it. In a bipartite graph a semi-resolving set is a set of vertices in one of the vertex classes that resolves the other class.We show that the metric dimension of the incidence graph of a finite projective plane of order $q\geq 23$ is $4q-4$, and describe all resolving sets of that size. Let $\tau_2$ denote the size of the smallest double blocking set in PG$(2,q)$, the Desarguesian projective plane of order $q$. We prove that for a semi-resolving set $S$ in the incidence graph of PG$(2,q)$, $|S|\geq \min \{2q+q/4-3, \tau_2-2\}$ holds. In particular, if $q\geq9$ is a square, then the smallest semi-resolving set in PG$(2,q)$ has size $2q+2\sqrt{q}$. As a corollary, we get that a blocking semioval in PG$(2, q)$, $q\geq 4$, has at least $9q/4-3$ points. A corrigendum was added to this paper on March 3, 2017.


1976 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 391-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. C. E. Dekker

The main purpose of this paper is to show how partial recursive functions and isols can be used to generalize the following three well-known theorems of combinatorial theory.(I) For every finite projective plane Π there is a unique number n such that Π has exactly n2 + n + 1 points and exactly n2 + n + 1 lines.(II) Every finite projective plane of order n can be coordinatized by a finite planar ternary ring of order n. Conversely, every finite planar ternary ring of order n coordinatizes a finite projective plane of order n.(III) There exists a finite projective plane of order n if and only if there exist n − 1 mutually orthogonal Latin squares of order n.


2013 ◽  
Vol 05 (03) ◽  
pp. 1350021 ◽  
Author(s):  
BING SU ◽  
YINFENG XU ◽  
BINHAI ZHU

Given a set of points P = {p1, p2, …, pn} in the Euclidean plane, with each point piassociated with a given direction vi∈ V. P(pi, vi) defines a half-plane and L(pi, vi) denotes the baseline that is perpendicular to viand passing through pi. Define a region dominated by piand vias a Baseline Bounded Half-Plane Voronoi Region, denoted as V or(pi, vi), if a point x ∈ V or(pi, vi), then (1) x ∈ P(pi, vi); (2) the line segment l(x, pi) does not cross any baseline; (3) if there is a point pj, such that x ∈ P(pj, vj), and the line segment l(x, pj) does not cross any baseline then d(x, pi) ≤ d(x, pj), j ≠ i. The Baseline Bounded Half-Plane Voronoi Diagram, denoted as V or(P, V), is the union of all V or(pi, vi). We show that V or(pi, vi) and V or(P, V) can be computed in O(n log n) and O(n2log n) time, respectively. For the heterogeneous point set, the same problem is also considered.


1975 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-36
Author(s):  
Frederick W. Stevenson

This paper introduces two relations both weaker than isotopism which may hold between planar ternary rings. We will concentrate on the geometric consequences rather than the algebraic properties of these relations. It is well-known that every projective plane can be coordinatized by a planar ternary ring and every planar ternary ring coordinatizes a projective plane. If two planar ternary rings are isomorphic then their associated projective planes are isomorphic; however, the converse is not true. In fact, an algebraic bond which necessarily holds between the coordinatizing planar ternary rings of isomorphic projective planes has not been found. Such a bond must, of course, be weaker than isomorphism; furthermore, it must be weaker than isotopism. Here we show that it is even weaker than the two new relations introduced.This is significant because the weaker of our relations is, in a sense, the weakest possible algebraic relation which can hold between planar ternary rings which coordinatize isomorphic projective planes.


1962 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 167-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seymour Ditor

Marshall Hall [l] shows how projective planes of very general structure may be constructed and at the same time exhibits an extensive class which are non-Desarguesian. Here we shall indicate how his method of free extension can be generalized to yield a class of planes which seem to be distinct from those which he obtains.A partial plane is a system consisting of two distinct sets of elements, a set of "points" P, Q,… and a set of "lines" l, m,…, and a relation between these two sets, called "incidence", such that for any two distinct points, there is at most one line incident with both (or, equivalently, for any two distinct lines, there is at most one point incident with both). A partial plane is complete if every two distinct points are joined by a line and every two distinct lines intersect in a point.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document