scholarly journals Viabilidad del Stare Decisis en el Arbitraje Nacional ecuatoriano: Navegando entre puntos conciliables

2021 ◽  
pp. 55-91
Author(s):  
Gabriel Eduardo Almeida Vintimilla
Keyword(s):  

Viabilidad del Stare Decisis en el Arbitraje Nacional ecuatoriano: Navegando entre puntos conciliables

Author(s):  
Sylvette Guillemard
Keyword(s):  

La vérité judiciaire est-elle un concept uniforme, qui aurait le même sens, du moins la même portée, en common law et en droit civil ? Nous suggérons de répondre par la négative. L’expression aurait un sens plus exact en common law. Ce faisant, la vérité judiciaire est intimement liée au stare decisis qui la perpétue pour lui donner une portée générale et pérenne. Qu’en est-il au Québec, dont la procédure civile est hybride ? Est-elle tenue à cette obligation de propager au fil du temps la vérité judiciaire ou en est-elle affranchie ? La réponse n’est pas catégorique puisque la jurisprudence, jusqu’à celle de la Cour suprême du Canada, voit dans le droit québécois, une contrainte édulcorée de la règle du précédent.


Author(s):  
Charles M. Cameron ◽  
Lewis A. Kornhauser ◽  
Giri Parameswaran

1931 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 212
Author(s):  
J. C. Hutcheson ◽  
Robert von Moschzisker
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Stefano Civitarese

The article revolves around the doctrine of precedent within the so-called European legal space, wondering whether and to what extent we can speak of a convergence towards a stare decisis model boosted by the harmonizing role of the Court of Justice of the European Union. The article argues that although there are still some differences between civil law and common law legal systems they regard more the style of reasoning and the deep understanding of the relationship between the present decision of a court and past judicial decisions than the very existence of the constraints of the latter upon the former. The article concludes that a sort of mechanism of stare decisis has in fact been created, even though, on the one hand, uncertainty remains as to the way in which the binding force of a precedent concretely operates in the system, and on the other hand, this mechanism relates exclusively to the relationships between past and future decisions of higher courts (horizontal effect). This change, far from being a shift towards a truly judge-made law system or a consequence of the final abandonment of the dictates of the rule of law, enhances legal certainty contributing to the fundamental requirement of stability of law as a feature of the ideal of the rule of law.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document