scholarly journals A Preliminary Assessment of the Initial Compression Power Requirement in CO2 Pipeline “Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Technologies”

Technologies ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdussalam El-Suleiman ◽  
Nnamdi Anosike ◽  
Pericles Pilidis
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Capture ◽  
Carbon Capture And Storage ◽  
Preliminary Assessment ◽  
Power Requirement ◽  
Ccs Technologies ◽  
And Storage

Technical and Economic Aspects of Carbon Capture an Storage — A Review

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 357-392 ◽  
Author(s):  
Havva Balat ◽  
Cahide Öz
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Dioxide ◽  
Carbon Dioxide Emissions ◽  
Carbon Capture ◽  
Fossil Fuels ◽  
Carbon Capture And Storage ◽  
The United States ◽  
Potential Contribution ◽  
Economic Aspects ◽  
Ccs Technologies ◽  
And Storage

This article deals with review of technical and economic aspects of Carbon Capture and Storage. Since the late 1980s a new concept is being developed which enables to make use of fossil fuels with a considerably reduced emission of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere. The concept is often called ‘Carbon Capture and Storage’ (CCS). CCS technologies are receiving increasing attention, mainly for their potential contribution to the optimal mitigation of carbon dioxide emissions that is intended to avoid future, dangerous climate change. CCS technologies attract a lot of attention because they could allow “to reduce our carbon dioxide emissions to the atmosphere whilst continuing to use fossil fuels”. CCS is not a completely new technology, e.g., the United States alone is sequestering about 8.5 MtC for enhanced oil recovery each year. Today, CCS technologies are widely recognised as an important means of progress in industrialized countries.

Analysis of Policy Incentives for Selection of CCS Technologies

2013 ◽  
Vol 869-870 ◽  
pp. 967-970 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao Huang ◽  
Xiao Qin Li ◽  
Li Fei Chen
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Capture ◽  
Carbon Capture And Storage ◽  
Price Policy ◽  
Investment Strategies ◽  
Real Options Theory ◽  
Value Evaluation ◽  
Ccs Technologies ◽  
Investment Models ◽  
Policy Incentives ◽  
And Storage

This paper studies the effect of policy incentives on investment strategies of carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies. We establish CCS investment models based on real options theory for investment value evaluation of CCS, which consider CO2price, policy incentives and different CCS technologies that include the old existing CCS technology and the new one. We evaluate CCS investment option values and calculate the change of CCS investment values and thresholds due to the variation of CO2price and policy incentives. We conclude that the optimal strategy is investing in the new CCS technology when there are enough policy incentives, otherwise, it is optimal to firstly invest in the old existing CCS technology and then upgrade to the new one.

scholarly journals Materials for use in calcium looping technology for CCS – corrosion processes in high-temperature CO2

2017 ◽  
Vol 61 (4) ◽  
pp. 143-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Poláčková ◽  
J. Petrů ◽  
M. Janák ◽  
J. Berka ◽  
A. Krausová
Keyword(s):  
High Temperature ◽  
Carbon Capture ◽  
Carbon Capture And Storage ◽  
Special Device ◽  
Temperature Oxidation ◽  
Aisi 304 ◽  
Gaseous Environment ◽  
Calcium Looping ◽  
Ccs Technologies ◽  
And Storage

Abstract Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) technologies are a perspective solution to reduce the amount of CO2 emissions. One of promising methods is Ca-looping, which is based on carbonation and calcination reactions. During both of these processes, especially calcination, high temperatures (650-950°C) are required. This means high demands on the corrosion resistance of equipment materials. Therefore, we carried out a study to suggest materials with suitable properties for calciner construction, which have to be particularly heat resistant: stainless steels (AISI 304, AISI 316L and AISI 316Ti) and nickel alloys (Inconel 713, Inconel 738, Incoloy 800H). A special device simulating calciner environment was built for this purpose. Chosen materials were tested in temperature 900°C, atmospheric pressure and gaseous environment with composition that can be possible in a calciner. The surfaces of materials were evaluated to determine composition and properties of formed oxide layers. High temperature oxidation was observed on all tested materials and oxide exfoliation occurred on some of tested materials (304, 316L).

MOFIA: a chemoinformatic webserver for the prediction of CO2 adsorption in metal organic frameworks (MOF)

2013 ◽  
Vol 1523 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Fernandez ◽  
Tom D Daff ◽  
Nicholas R. Trefiak ◽  
Tom K. Woo
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Capture ◽  
Metal Organic Framework ◽  
Carbon Capture And Storage ◽  
High Performing ◽  
Nanoporous Metal ◽  
Metal Organic ◽  
Ccs Technologies ◽  
Gcmc Simulations ◽  
And Storage ◽  
Grand Canonical

ABSTRACTNanoporous metal-organic framework (MOF) materials are strong candidates for energy efficient carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies. A total of ∼20,000 hypothetical MOFs were ab initio screened for CO2 adsorption using grand canonical Monte-Carlo (GCMC) simulations. Novel radial distribution function (RDF) scores were modified for periodic systems to predict the CO2 adsorption of MOFs using chemoinformatic models. The test set predictions yielded accuracies of 0.76 and 0.85 at 0.1 bar and 1 bar, respectively. The models were used to screen a large database for high performing MOFs and the top 100 structures were successfully validated by GCMC simulations. The chemoinformatic predictors of the CO2 adsorption of MOFs are available online at http://titan.chem.uottawa.ca/woolab/MOFIA/#carbondioxide.

Carbon capture and storage in the CDM: Finding its place among climate mitigation options?

Climate Law ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meinhard Doelle ◽  
Emily Lukaweski
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Clean Development Mechanism ◽  
Carbon Capture ◽  
Carbon Capture And Storage ◽  
International Negotiations ◽  
Climate Mitigation ◽  
Mitigation Options ◽  
Ccs Technologies ◽  
And Storage

The climate negotiations in Durban, South Africa, concluded seven years of international negotiations on the role of carbon capture and storage in the Clean Development Mechanism. This article considers the resulting Durban CCS rules in light of the state of CCS technologies, their place among the range of climate mitigation options, and the resulting challenges, opportunities, and uncertainties surrounding the role of CCS. Eight principles that should guide the use of CCS in the CDM are proposed, and the Durban rules are assessed against them.

Guanidine as a strong CO2 adsorbent: A DFT study on cooperative CO2 adsorption

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian Anila ◽  
Cherumuttathu Hariharan Suresh
Keyword(s):  
Chemical Reactions ◽  
Carbon Capture ◽  
Co2 Adsorption ◽  
Carbon Capture And Storage ◽  
Dft Study ◽  
Direct Air Capture ◽  
Air Capture ◽  
Ccs Technologies ◽  
And Storage ◽  
Co2 Adsorbent

Among the various carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies, direct air capture (DAC) of CO2 by engineered chemical reactions on suitable adsorbents has attained more attention in recent times. Guanidine...

scholarly journals Coupled Climate–Economy–Biosphere (CoCEB) model – Part 2: Deforestation control and investment in carbon capture and storage technologies

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 865-906
Author(s):  
K. B. Z. Ogutu ◽  
F. D'Andrea ◽  
M. Ghil ◽  
C. Nyandwi ◽  
M. M. Manene ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Carbon Dioxide ◽  
Carbon Capture ◽  
Carbon Dioxide Emission ◽  
Carbon Capture And Storage ◽  
Carbon Dioxide Concentration ◽  
Gdp Growth ◽  
Low Carbon ◽  
Ccs Technologies ◽  
And Storage

Abstract. This study uses the global climate–economy–biosphere (CoCEB) model developed in Part 1 to investigate economic aspects of deforestation control and carbon sequestration in forests, as well as the efficiency of carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies as policy measures for climate change mitigation. We assume – as in Part 1 – that replacement of one technology with another occurs in terms of a logistic law, so that the same law also governs the dynamics of reduction in carbon dioxide emission using CCS technologies. In order to take into account the effect of deforestation control, a slightly more complex description of the carbon cycle than in Part 1 is needed. Consequently, we add a biomass equation into the CoCEB model and analyze the ensuing feedbacks and their effects on per capita gross domestic product (GDP) growth. Integrating biomass into the CoCEB and applying deforestation control as well as CCS technologies has the following results: (i) low investment in CCS contributes to reducing industrial carbon emissions and to increasing GDP, but further investment leads to a smaller reduction in emissions, as well as in the incremental GDP growth; and (ii) enhanced deforestation control contributes to a reduction in both deforestation emissions and in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration, thus reducing the impacts of climate change and contributing to a slight appreciation of GDP growth. This effect is however very small compared to that of low-carbon technologies or CCS. We also find that the result in (i) is very sensitive to the formulation of CCS costs, while to the contrary, the results for deforestation control are less sensitive.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document