scholarly journals The Effect of Listing Period on Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Korea

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 2447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nam Chul Jung ◽  
Hyun Ah Kim
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Listed Companies ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Analyst Following ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
The Us ◽  
Prior Literature ◽  
Corporate Social

Newly listed firms can actively engage in corporate social responsibility (CSR) to build reputation, but they may postpone CSR until they have enough slack for it. Related to this, prior literature does not provide consistent results, the US evidence supports the latter while the Chinese results support the former. To extend the literature, we use Korean listed companies and examine the association between the listing period and CSR. We further investigate the effect of analyst following on the relationship. The empirical results show that firms with a shorter listing period invest more in CSR and that the association exists only in firm-years followed by analysts, indicating the importance of the information environment to inform CSR. We additionally find that young listed companies mainly use social contribution and soundness, which can be discretionarily conducted from a short-term perspective. The results of this study using CSR to obtain a short-term objective suggest that policymakers need to analyze a firm’s behavior from various perspectives and to establish proper guidelines to achieve a long-term goal of CSR “sustainability”.

scholarly journals Program Corporate Social Responsibility di Industri Hotel: Sebuah Keuntungan atau Kerugian untuk Hotel

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 502
Author(s):  
Maria Pia Adiati
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Activity ◽  
Public Image ◽  
Term Result ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Short Term Result ◽  
The Social ◽  
Corporate Social

A word of CSR which stands for Corporate Social Responsibility is now becoming popular and more often many companies insert the CSR activities into its company profile. CSR has another different names such as Social Activity or Sustainability Development. CSR program according to wikipedia ia an organization or company has a responsibility to its customer, employees, share holders, community and environment in every aspect involved in company operasional. In the management science, there is a level whereas it is called social responsibility or it is just social obligation. Many opinions argues that CSR program will reduce the profit of the respected company. But many opinions denies the previous argue by saying the CSR program is a long term program profit gain since the short term result is good public image. The good public image will lead the loyalti of customer to keep using the product or service from the hotel. The customer loyalti also affected by the customer’s opinion, if they involves in the social activities held by the hotel, they also participate in a social activity.

The effect of corporate social responsibility on earnings management and tax avoidance in Chinese listed companies

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 632-652 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haijing Liu ◽  
Hyun-Ah Lee
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Earnings Management ◽  
Tax Avoidance ◽  
Listed Companies ◽  
Private Enterprises ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
Chinese Listed Companies ◽  
Corporate Social

Purpose This paper aims to verify the effect of corporate social responsibility (CSR) on Chinese listed firms’ earnings management and tax avoidance. Specifically, this study investigates whether government-guided CSR implementation indeed drives firms to behave in a responsible manner by constraining earnings management and tax avoidance. Design/methodology/approach The paper analyses a sample of Chinese listed companies that are confronted with the unique situation of CSR being developed at a rapid pace by government-led policy and regulation. The study further investigates whether the effect of CSR on earnings management and tax avoidance is different for state-owned and private enterprises by partitioning the sample into these two subgroups. Findings The findings of this study show that government-guided CSR could be effective in reducing the firms’ earnings management and tax avoidance, even though the effect is limited to state-owned enterprises. Originality/value This paper provides new evidence on the relation of CSR with earnings management and tax avoidance in the Chinese context and sheds light on the importance of differentiating between the state-owned and private enterprises when studying the corporate behaviors of Chinese firms.

scholarly journals Do Corporate Social Responsibility Activities Reduce Credit Risk? Short and Long-Term Perspectives

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (24) ◽  
pp. 6962 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thuy Thi Thu Truong ◽  
Jungmu Kim
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Credit Risk ◽  
Credit Default Swap ◽  
Community Diversity ◽  
Employee Relations ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Long Run ◽  
Corporate Social

This study examines the short- and long-run effects of corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities on the credit risk implied in credit derivative prices. Measuring the different term effects on credit risk by the slope of credit default swap (CDS) spreads with different maturities, we investigate how CSR activities affect credit risk differently in the short and long run. Fama-MacBeth regressions reveal that firms with higher CSR scores tend to have more gently decreasing CDS slopes because, on average, CSR activities reduce credit risk in the long run more than in the short run. An analysis of individual CSR categories shows that while community, diversity and employee relations lead to a lower CDS slope, human rights and product characteristics increase the CDS slope. This finding suggests that not all CSR activities affect short-term and long-term credit risks in the same direction. Therefore, even though CSR activities can reduce credit risk in the long-run, some CSR activities may increase the short-term credit risk and hence increase short-term borrowing costs.

scholarly journals Empirical study on the correlation of corporate social responsibility with the banks efficiency and stability

2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 86-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatiana Vasileva ◽  
Anna Lasukova
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Main Hypothesis ◽  
National Bank ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Relationship

The aim of this paper is to investigate the relationship between the concept of corporate social responsibility and the most important characteristics of banking – the efficiency and stability in a sample of twelve Ukrainian banks, which are the biggest banks in Ukraine according to the classification of the National Bank of Ukraine (NBU). Our research covers the period from 2006 to 2012. Based on the literature review we construct two main hypothesis related to the impact on the corporate social responsibility concept (CSR) of the following independent variables: 1 – efficiency (as a short term period characteristics of banking), 2 – stability (as a long term characteristics of banking).

scholarly journals Managerial Overconfidence, Corporate Social Responsibility Activities, and Financial Constraints

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyung-Hee Park ◽  
Jinho Byun ◽  
Paul Moon Sub Choi
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Financial Constraints ◽  
Securities And Exchange Commission ◽  
The Us ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
Long Term Performance ◽  
Managerial Overconfidence ◽  
Term Performance

Managerial overconfidence refers to managers’ cognitive bias, according to which they demonstrate unwarranted belief in their own judgments and capabilities. This study provides a new measurement of CEO overconfidence through textual analysis of management discussion and analysis (MD&A) in 10-K documents by making use of the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) EDGAR database. Overconfidence was obtained from “optimism” using the Diction program. From a sample of 19,367 US firms from 1994 to 2016, we found that CEO overconfidence was negatively related to corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities. Since overconfident CEOs are likely to consider CSR activities less important than their own ability, they seem to reduce CSR activities. Also, CSR activities initiated by overconfident CEOs were negatively related to firms’ long-term performance. However, CSR activities led to positive long-term performance in firms that were financially constrained. Our findings show that CSR activities undertaken as a result of CEO overconfidence by financially unconstrained firms could be harmful to shareholder value in the long term.

scholarly journals Corporate Social Responsibility and Managerial Compensation: Further Evidence from Spanish Listed Companies

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (13) ◽  
pp. 7341
Author(s):  
Fabián Blanes ◽  
Cristina De Fuentes ◽  
Rubén Porcuna
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Positive Relationship ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Managerial Compensation ◽  
Compensation Scheme ◽  
Negatively Associated ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
Corporate Social

Ongoing regulatory efforts aim to link managerial compensation with a firm’s performance. However, little is known about whether and how Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) goals are considered in the design of the managerial compensation scheme. This paper addresses this research question by analyzing a sample of Spanish listed firms for the period spanning 2013–2018. The outcomes of the regressions suggest that there is a positive relationship between CSR and the managerial compensation, but this relationship is significant only with lower levels of CSR. The study also reveals that CSR is positively associated with the proportion of equity-based compensation and, therefore, negatively associated with the proportion of cash-based compensation. In all, our results suggest that firms with lower levels of CSR, likely following social pressures, seek to improve their investments in CSR; and, in doing so, they design a managerial compensation scheme that incentivizes the manager to meet the firm’s goals related to CSR investments. Hence, since CSR is associated with an increase in the long-term firm’s value, the equity-based component of the managerial scheme is higher than in the remaining firms. However, the high proportion of cash-based compensation is far from the desirable goals promoted by the Governance Codes.

scholarly journals Executive Incentives Matter for Corporate Social Responsibility under Earnings Pressure and Institutional Investors Supervision

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 2492 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lili Ding ◽  
Zhongchao Zhao ◽  
Lei Wang
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Institutional Investors ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Institutional Csr ◽  
Csr Strategy ◽  
Technical Csr ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
The Impact

This paper theoretically explores the impact of the incentive preferences of executives (i.e., short-term incentives and long-term incentives) on corporate social responsibility (CSR) decisions (i.e., institutional CSR and technical CSR). Further, the paper presents the mechanism through which executives influence CSR activities by the pressures from financial analysts and institutional investors supervision. Using a large sample of China-listed firms over 2007–2017, we achieve some helpful empirical results. The executives with short-term incentives tend to implement technical CSR strategy, while those with long-term incentives tend to implement institutional CSR strategy. Executives with short-term incentives, compared with those with long-term incentives, show stronger inter-temporal tradeoffs behaviors in the earnings pressure context. Furthermore, dedicated institutional investors can effectively attenuate the hypocritical behaviors of executives, and the effectiveness of governance shows a positive relationship with investors’ horizon. Our findings enrich the understanding on the relationship between the executives and CSR decisions in the earnings pressure context and further helps to perfect the institutional design in China’s listed companies.

Do institutional investors have homogeneous influence on corporate social responsibility? Evidence from investor investment horizon

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 301-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yun Meng ◽  
Xiaoqiong Wang
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Institutional Investors ◽  
Empirical Support ◽  
Investment Horizon ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
Institutional Shareholders

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the relation between the investment horizon of institutional investors and corporate social responsibility (CSR). Design/methodology/approach Utilizing unique datasets on CSR and the investor horizon measures (Gaspar et al., 2005), the authors categorize institutional investors into long-term and short-term investors. This method captures the heterogeneity of investors. Findings The authors show that long-term institutional investors promote CSR engagement, while short-term investors discourage it. The authors further document that shareholders’ ownership horizon has implications on corporate decisions in the CSR framework. The presence of long (short)-term institutional investors is positively (negatively) associated with dividend payout, discourages (encourages) managerial misbehaviors and enhances (reduces) firm valuation, only for firms with high CSR performance. Research limitations/implications Different from previous studies that treat institutional investors homogeneously, this paper provides empirical support that investors are indeed different in influencing CSR. Originality/value Few prior studies address the question of whether active engagement by institutional shareholders on CSR issues differs by the types of institutional ownership. The study attempts to fill this gap by examining the effects of institutions’ investment horizon, one of the major ways to classify institutional shareholders, on the CSR performance of firms.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document