scholarly journals Impact of Meeting Different Guidelines for Protein Intake on Muscle Mass and Physical Function in Physically Active Older Women

Nutrients ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 1156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Nilsson ◽  
Diego Montiel Rojas ◽  
Fawzi Kadi

The role of dietary protein intake on muscle mass and physical function in older adults is important for the prevention of age-related physical limitations. The aim of the present study was to elucidate links between dietary protein intake and muscle mass and physical function in older women meeting current guidelines of objectively assessed physical activity. In 106 women (65 to 70 years old), protein intake was assessed using a 6-day food record and participants were classified into high and low protein intake groups using two Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) thresholds (0.8 g·kg−1 bodyweight (BW) and 1.1 g·kg−1 BW). Body composition, aerobic fitness, and quadriceps strength were determined using standardized procedures, and self-reported physical function was assessed using the SF-12 Health Survey. Physical activity was assessed by accelerometry and self-report. Women below the 0.8 g·kg−1 BW threshold had a lower muscle mass (p < 0.05) with no differences in physical function variables. When based on the higher RDA threshold (1.1 g·kg−1 BW), in addition to significant differences in muscle mass, women below the higher threshold had a significantly (p < 0.05) higher likelihood of having physical limitations. In conclusion, the present study supports the RDA threshold of 0.8 g·kg−1 BW of proteins to prevent the loss of muscle mass and emphasizes the importance of the higher RDA threshold of at least 1.1 g·kg−1 BW to infer additional benefits on constructs of physical function. Our study also supports the role of protein intake for healthy ageing, even in older adults meeting guidelines for physical activity.

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 3104
Author(s):  
Ilse J. M. Hagedoorn ◽  
Niala den Braber ◽  
Milou M. Oosterwijk ◽  
Christina M. Gant ◽  
Gerjan Navis ◽  
...  

Objective: In order to promote physical activity (PA) in patients with complicated type 2 diabetes, a better understanding of daily movement is required. We (1) objectively assessed PA in patients with type 2 diabetes, and (2) studied the association between muscle mass, dietary protein intake, and PA. Methods: We performed cross-sectional analyses in all patients included in the Diabetes and Lifestyle Cohort Twente (DIALECT) between November 2016 and November 2018. Patients were divided into four groups: <5000, 5000–6999, 7000–9999, ≥ 10,000 steps/day. We studied the association between muscle mass (24 h urinary creatinine excretion rate, CER) and protein intake (by Maroni formula), and the main outcome variable PA (steps/day, Fitbit Flex device) using multivariate linear regression analyses. Results: In the 217 included patients, the median steps/day were 6118 (4115–8638). Of these patients, 48 patients (22%) took 7000–9999 steps/day, 37 patients (17%) took ≥ 10,000 steps/day, and 78 patients (36%) took <5000 steps/day. Patients with <5000 steps/day had, in comparison to patients who took ≥10,000 steps/day, a higher body mass index (BMI) (33 ± 6 vs. 30 ± 5 kg/m2, p = 0.009), lower CER (11.7 ± 4.8 vs. 14.8 ± 3.8 mmol/24 h, p = 0.001), and lower protein intake (0.84 ± 0.29 vs. 1.08 ± 0.22 g/kg/day, p < 0.001). Both creatinine excretion (β = 0.26, p < 0.001) and dietary protein intake (β = 0.31, p < 0.001) were strongly associated with PA, which remained unchanged after adjustment for potential confounders. Conclusions: Prevalent insufficient protein intake and low muscle mass co-exist in obese patients with low physical activity. Dedicated intervention studies are needed to study the role of sufficient protein intake and physical activity in increasing or maintaining muscle mass in patients with type 2 diabetes.


Nutrients ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 2794
Author(s):  
Grith Højfeldt ◽  
Yusuke Nishimura ◽  
Kenneth Mertz ◽  
Simon R. Schacht ◽  
Jonas Lindberg ◽  
...  

Dietary protein has a pivotal role in muscle mass maintenance with advancing age. However, an optimal dose and distribution of protein intake across the day as well as the interaction with energy intake for the maintenance of muscle mass and physical function in healthy older adults remain to be fully elucidated. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between muscle mass, strength, and physical function, and the total amount and distribution of protein and energy intake across the day in healthy older individuals. The research question was addressed in a cross-sectional study including 184 Danish men and woman (age: 70.2 ± 3.9 years, body mass: 74.9 ± 12.1 kg, Body Mass Index (BMI): 25.4 ± 3.7 kg/m2) where a 3-day dietary registration, muscle mass, strength, and functional measurements were collected. We found that neither daily total protein intake nor distribution throughout the day were associated with muscle mass, strength, or physical function. Consequently, we do not provide an incentive for healthy older Danish individuals who already adhere to the current internationally accepted recommended dietary protein intake (0.83 g/kg/day) to change dietary protein intake or its distribution pattern throughout the day.


Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 3076
Author(s):  
Praval Khanal ◽  
Lingxiao He ◽  
Hans Degens ◽  
Georgina K. Stebbings ◽  
Gladys L. Onambele-Pearson ◽  
...  

Although multiple nutrients have shown protective effects with regard to preserving muscle function, the recommended amount of dietary protein and other nutrients profile on older adults for maintenance of high muscle mass is still debatable. The aims of this paper were to: (1) identify dietary differences between older women with low and high relative skeletal muscle mass, and (2) identify the minimal dietary protein intake associated with high relative skeletal muscle mass and test the threshold ability to determine an association with skeletal muscle phenotypes. Older women (n = 281; 70 ± 7 years, 65 ± 14 kg), with both low and high relative skeletal muscle mass groups, completed a food questionnaire. Skeletal muscle mass, fat-free mass (FFM), biceps brachii thickness, vastus lateralis anatomical cross-sectional area (VLACSA), handgrip strength (HGS), maximum elbow flexion torque (MVCEF), maximum knee extension torque (MVCKE), muscle quality (HGS/Body mass), and fat mass were measured. Older women with low relative skeletal muscle mass had a lower daily intake of protein, iodine, polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA), Vit E, manganese, milk, fish, nuts and seeds (p < 0.05) compared to women with high relative skeletal muscle mass. The minimum required dietary protein intake for high relative skeletal muscle mass was 1.17 g/kg body mass/day (g/kg/d) (sensitivity: 0.68; specificity: 0.62). Women consuming ≥1.17 g/kg/d had a lower BMI (B = −3.9, p < 0.001) and fat mass (B = −7.8, p < 0.001), and a higher muscle quality (B = 0.06, p < 0.001). The data indicate that to maintain muscle mass and function, older women should consume ≥1.17 g/kg/d dietary protein, through a varied diet including milk, fish and nuts that also contain polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) and micronutrients such as iodine, Vit E and manganese.


Author(s):  
L.-Y. Zhu ◽  
R. Chan ◽  
L. Li ◽  
T. Kwok ◽  
J. Woo

Background: Protein intake is a major risk factor of sarcopenia. To combat sarcopenia, strategies focused on providing sufficient high quality dietary protein are required. Objectives: We aimed to identify the pattern of dietary protein intake and its association with muscle and physical functions among community-dwelling sarcopenic Chinese older adults in Hong Kong. Design: Baseline data of a randomized controlled trial in sarcopenia were analyzed. Setting: Participants who were ambulant and could travel to the assessment centre at a regional hospital in Hong Kong were recruited in nearby community elderly centers, nursing homes and other institutional settings. Participants: A total of 113 Chinese older adults aged 65 or above who had sarcopenia defined using The Asia Working Group Criteria for Sarcopenia were recruited. Measurements: Dietary data and muscle function tests were measured. Results: Although the energy intake (mean + standard deviation: 1491.7±338.6 kcal/d in female, 1738.1±392.9 kcal/d in male) was lower than the recommended daily energy requirement, protein intake averaged 1.6±0.5 g/kg body weight/day, which was high compared to the current Recommended Daily Allowance (RDA, 0.8 g/kg body weight/day for older people). Animal and plant sources contributed to 62% and 38% respectively of the total protein intake. Dietary protein intake was not evenly distributed throughout the day. Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) score was more predictive of muscle mass and functions compared to protein intake and sources. Conclusions: Our findings showed that PASE was more predictive of muscle mass and functions compared to protein intake and sources, and there was a minimal association between protein intake and muscle performance measures in our community-dwelling sacropenic older adults. The protein replete state of our study population may explain these findings. The observations that an uneven distribution of protein intake throughout a day may suggest the need to increase protein intake at breakfast among Chinese sarcopenic older adults.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (OCE2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Liset Elstgeest ◽  
Laura Schaap ◽  
Martijn Heymans ◽  
Linda Hengeveld ◽  
Denise Houston ◽  
...  

A lower dietary protein intake has been associated with muscle mass loss, a decline in physical performance and more mobility limitations over time in old age. Current guidelines for protein intake advise ≥ 0.8 g/kg body weight (BW)/d, while experts propose a higher intake for older adults (1.0–1.2 g/kg BW/d), irrespective of sex. It is unknown whether the association between protein intake and loss of muscle mass is different for men and women, and whether there is an optimal protein intake to prevent this loss. Therefore, we investigated the shape of the association between protein intake and change in appendicular lean mass (aLM) over 3 years in community-dwelling older adults, separately for men and women. Data of men (n = 935) and women (n = 1061) aged 70–81 years and participating in the Health, Aging and Body Composition study were used. Dietary protein intake, measured in 1998/1999 using a food frequency questionnaire, was expressed in daily grams of protein per kg adjusted BW (g/kg aBW/d) by using healthy instead of actual BW. aLM was assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at baseline and after 3 years. Restricted cubic spline functions with 3 knots in linear regression models were used as well as linear regression analyses. The fit of both models was compared using the likelihood ratio test. All analyses were stratified by sex and adjusted for demographics, lifestyle factors, chronic conditions, height and baseline aLM. Mean (SD) protein intake was 70.8 (26.2) g in men and 61.0 (22.5) g in women, or 0.93 (0.36) and 0.95 (0.36) g/kg aBW/d, respectively. Over 3 years, mean loss of aLM was 0.61 (1.16) kg in men and 0.35 (0.95) kg in women. In both men and women, the likelihood ratio was not significant (P = 0.57 and 0.67, respectively), indicating that the spline regression model did not fit the data better than the linear regression model. In men, the linear model showed no association between protein intake and change in aLM (adjusted B per 0.1 g/kg aBW/d = 18.1, P = 0.34). In women, a higher protein intake was associated with a smaller loss of aLM (adjusted B per 0.1 g/kg aBW/d = 34.5, P = 0.017). This study suggests a linear association between protein intake and 3-year loss of aLM in older women; however, no association was found in older men. Future studies into sex differences in associations with other physical outcomes are needed. For both sexes, an optimal protein intake could not be detected.


2015 ◽  
Vol 71 (3) ◽  
pp. 356-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert R. McLean ◽  
Kelsey M. Mangano ◽  
Marian T. Hannan ◽  
Douglas P. Kiel ◽  
Shivani Sahni

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document