scholarly journals Development of Smart-Ring-Based Chest Compression Depth Feedback Device for High Quality Chest Compressions: A Proof-of-Concept Study

Biosensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 35
Author(s):  
Seungjae Lee ◽  
Yeongtak Song ◽  
Jongshill Lee ◽  
Jaehoon Oh ◽  
Tae Ho Lim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chest Compression ◽  
Depth Estimation ◽  
Estimation Algorithm ◽  
Feedback System ◽  
Measurement Unit ◽  
Smart Device ◽  
Feedback Systems ◽  
Chest Compressions ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Compression Depth

Recently, a smart-device-based chest compression depth (CCD) feedback system that helps ensure that chest compressions have adequate depth during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was developed. However, no CCD feedback device has been developed for infants, and many feedback systems are inconvenient to use. In this paper, we report the development of a smart-ring-based CCD feedback device for CPR based on an inertial measurement unit, and propose a high-quality chest compression depth estimation algorithm that considers the orientation of the device. The performance of the proposed feedback system was evaluated by comparing it with a linear variable differential transformer in three CPR situations. The experimental results showed compression depth errors of 2.0 ± 1.1, 2.2 ± 0.9, and 1.4 ± 1.1 mm in the three situations. In addition, we conducted a pilot test with an adult/infant mannequin. The results of the experiments show that the proposed smart-ring-based CCD feedback system is applicable to various chest compression methods based on real CPR situations.

scholarly journals Comparison of Chest Compression Quality Using Wing Boards versus Walking Next to a Moving Stretcher: A Randomized Crossover Simulation Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 1584
Author(s):  
Yukako Nakashima ◽  
Takeji Saitoh ◽  
Hideki Yasui ◽  
Masahide Ueno ◽  
Kensuke Hotta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Chest Compression ◽  
Vital Signs ◽  
Borg Scale ◽  
Chest Compressions ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Compression Depth ◽  
Hands On ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Randomized Crossover Study

Background: When a rescuer walks alongside a stretcher and compresses the patient’s chest, the rescuer produces low-quality chest compressions. We hypothesized that a stretcher equipped with wing boards allows for better chest compressions than the conventional method. Methods: In this prospective, randomized, crossover study, we enrolled 45 medical workers and students. They performed hands-on chest compressions to a mannequin on a moving stretcher, while either walking (the walk method) or riding on wings attached to the stretcher (the wing method). The depths of the chest compressions were recorded. The participants’ vital signs were measured before and after the trials. Results: The average compression depth during the wing method (5.40 ± 0.50 cm) was greater than during the walk method (4.85 ± 0.80 cm; p < 0.01). The average compression rates during the two minutes were 215 ± 8 and 217 ± 5 compressions in the walk and wing methods, respectively (p = ns). Changes in blood pressure (14 ± 11 vs. 22 ± 14 mmHg), heart rate (32 ± 13 vs. 58 ± 20 bpm), and modified Borg scale (4 (interquartile range: 2–4) vs. 6 (5–7)) were significantly lower in the wing method cohort compared to the walking cohort (p < 0.01). The rescuer’s size and physique were positively correlated with the chest compression depth during the walk method; however, we found no significant correlation in the wing method. Conclusions: Chest compressions performed on the stretcher while moving using the wing method can produce high-quality chest compressions, especially for rescuers with a smaller size and physique.

Abstract 122: Compression-Induced Ventilation Volumes Decrease with Chest Compression Depth and Prolonged CPR

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone Ordelman ◽  
Paul Aelen ◽  
Paul van Berkom ◽  
Gerrit J Noordergraaf
Keyword(s):  
Gas Exchange ◽  
Endotracheal Tube ◽  
Chest Compression ◽  
Minute Ventilation ◽  
Time Effect ◽  
Chest Compressions ◽  
Initial Value ◽  
Compression Depth ◽  
Minute Period ◽  
Over Time

Introduction: Compression-induced ventilation may aid gas exchange during CPR. We hypothesized that the amount of gas moving in and out of the lungs depends on chest compression depth. Methods: VF was induced in five female, anesthetized and intubated pigs of about 30 kg. After 30 seconds of non-intervention time, chest compressions were started and maintained at a rate of 100 compressions per minute. Every two minutes chest compression depth was altered, resulting in 14 minutes of CPR with a depth sequence of 4 cm, 3 cm, 4 cm, 5 cm, 5.5 cm, 5 cm and 4 cm. Ventilations were performed manually with a bag-valve device 10 times per minute during continuous chest compressions by a dedicated expert. Airway flow was measured at the end of the endotracheal tube. Compression-induced ventilation was determined from the periods between the manual ventilations. The average compression-induced minute ventilation volume was determined over the last minute of each two minute period of CPR at each specific chest compression depth. Results: The compression-induced ventilation volume in the first period of CPR at 4 cm of depth was 1.6 ± 0.9 L/min (about 4% of total ventilation volume). The figure shows how the compression-induced ventilation volume decreases with increasing chest compression depth, relative to this initial value. CPR with a chest compression depth of 4 cm was performed three times in each pig, and the corresponding compression-induced ventilation volumes decreased with time. This suggested that there might be just a time effect (e.g. atelectasis). However, the final compression depth of 4 cm resulted in larger compression-induced ventilation volumes than the preceding 5 cm and 5.5 cm compression depths, indicating that the decreased volume over time could not purely be a time effect, but must also be an effect of the depth. Conclusion: In conclusion, compression-induced ventilation volume appears to decrease with deeper chest compressions as well as with prolonged CPR.

Abstract 133: Electrical Insulating Gloves for Safe Hands-on Defibrillation Do Not Compromise the Quality of Chest Compressions

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakob E Thomsen ◽  
Martin Harpsø ◽  
Graham W Petley ◽  
Svend Vittinghus ◽  
Charles D Deakin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Chest Compression ◽  
Electrical Insulation ◽  
Compression Rate ◽  
Chest Compressions ◽  
Compression Depth ◽  
Resuscitation Guidelines ◽  
Hands On ◽  
Class 1

Introduction: We have recently shown that Class 1 electrical insulating gloves are safe for hands-on defibrillation. Continuous chest compressions during defibrillation reduce the peri-shock pauses and increase the subsequent chance of successful defibrillation. In this study we have investigated the effect of these electrical insulation gloves on the quality of chest compressions, compared with normal clinical examination gloves. Methods: Emergency medical technicians trained in 2010 resuscitation guidelines delivered uninterrupted chest compressions for 6 min on a manikin, whilst wearing Class 1 electrical insulating gloves or clinical examination gloves. The order of gloves was randomized and each session of chest compressions was separated by at least 30 min to avoid fatigue. Data were collected from the manikin. Compression depth and compression rate were compared. Results: Data from 35 participants are shown in Figure 1. There was no statistically significant difference between Class 1 electrical insulating gloves in chest compression depth (median±range: 45 (28-61) vs 43 (28-61) p=0.69) and chest compression rate (113 (67-150) vs 113(72-145), p=0.87) when compared to clinical examination cloves. Conclusion: These preliminary data suggest that the use of Class 1 electrical insulation gloves does not reduce the quality of chest compressions during simulated CPR compared to clinical examination gloves.

Abstract 2019: Untrained Volunteers Perform High Quality CPR When using an Automatic External Defibrillator with a CPR Voice Prompting Algorithm

Circulation ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 116 (suppl_16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin S Abella ◽  
Salem Kim ◽  
Alexandra Colombus ◽  
Cheryl L Shea ◽  
Lance B Becker
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Chest Compression ◽  
Automatic External Defibrillator ◽  
Chest Compressions ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Cpr Training ◽  
Adult Volunteers ◽  
Improve Patient ◽  
External Defibrillator

Background: Recent investigations have demonstrated that CPR performance among trained providers can be improved by audiovisual prompting and real-time feedback, and higher quality CPR before defibrillation can improve shock success and has the potential to improve patient outcomes. Objective: We hypothesized that simplified voice prompts incorporated into an automatic external defibrillator (AED) can lead to improvements in CPR performance by untrained lay rescuers. Methods: Adult volunteers with no prior CPR training were assessed in their use of an AED with chest compression voice instructions and metronome prompts on a CPR-recording manikin. Volunteers were given minimal instructions regarding use of the device and were given no instructions regarding CPR performance. The AED was designed to prompt five cycles of 30 chest compressions between defibrillatory attempts. Chest compression rates and depths were measured via review of videotape and manikin recording data, respectively. Results: A total of 60 adults were assessed in their use of the AED, with a mean age of 33.6±12.8; 36/63 (57%) were female. Mean chest compression rate was 103±12 and mean depth was 37±14 mm. Furthermore, minimal decay in chest compression rates occurred over 5 cycles of chest compressions, with mean rate of 101±19 during the first cycle and 104±10 during the 5 th cycle. No volunteers were unable to use the AED or complete 5 cycles of chest compressions. Conclusions: Our work demonstrates that with appropriate real-time prompts delivered even in the absence of training or human coaching, laypersons can perform CPR that has a quality often similar to trained providers. This finding has important implications for AED design especially in light of the renewed importance of both CPR and the interaction of quality chest compressions and defibrillatory success.

scholarly journals CPR Compression Rotation Every One Minute Versus Two Minutes: A Randomized Cross-Over Manikin Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Nutthapong Pechaksorn ◽  
Veerapong Vattanavanit
Keyword(s):  
Heart Rate ◽  
Respiratory Rate ◽  
Chest Compression ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Chest Compressions ◽  
Compression Depth ◽  
End Points ◽  
The One ◽  
Support Guidelines

Background. The current basic life support guidelines recommend two-minute shifts for providing chest compressions when two rescuers are performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation. However, various studies have found that rescuer fatigue can occur within one minute, coupled with a decay in the quality of chest compressions. Our aim was to compare chest compression quality metrics and rescuer fatigue between alternating rescuers in performing one- and two-minute chest compressions. Methods. This prospective randomized cross-over study was conducted at Songklanagarind Hospital, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand. We enrolled sixth-year medical students and residents and randomly grouped them into pairs to perform 8 minutes of chest compression, utilizing both the one-minute and two-minute scenarios on a manikin. The primary end points were chest compression depth and rate. The secondary end points included rescuers’ fatigue, respiratory rate, and heart rate. Results. One hundred four participants were recruited. Compared with participants in the two-minute group, participants in the one-minute group had significantly higher mean (standard deviation, SD) compression depth (mm) (45.8 (7.2) vs. 44.5 (7.1), P=0.01) but there was no difference in the mean (SD) rate (compressions per min) (116.1 (12.5) vs. 117.8 (12.4), P=0.08), respectively. The rescuers in the one-minute group had significantly less fatigue (P<0.001) and change in respiratory rate (P<0.001), but there was no difference in the change of heart rate (P=0.59) between the two groups. Conclusion. There were a significantly higher compression depth and lower rescuer fatigue in the 1-minute chest compression group compared with the 2-minute group. This trial is registered with TCTR20170823001.

scholarly journals Testing mechanical chest compression devices for pre-hospital patient transport under resuscitation

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maximilian Jörgens ◽  
Jürgen Körniger ◽  
Karl-Georg Kanz ◽  
Torsten Birkholz ◽  
Heiko Hübner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chest Compression ◽  
User Satisfaction ◽  
Chest Compressions ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Physical Effort ◽  
Patient Transport ◽  
Device Stability ◽  
Mechanical Chest Compression ◽  
Electrical Devices ◽  
Hospital Transport

Abstract Background Mechanical chest compression (mCPR) offers advantages during transport under cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Little is known how devices perform en-route. Aim of the study was to measure performance of mCPR devices of different design during pre-hospital transport.Methods We tested animax mono (AM), autopulse (AP), corpuls cpr (CC) and LUCAS2 (L2). The route had 6 stages (transport on soft stretcher or gurney involving a stairwell, trips with turntable ladder, rescue basket and ambulance including loading/unloading). Stationary mCPR with the respective device served as control. A four-person team carried an intubated and bag-ventilated mannequin under mCPR to assess device-stability (displacement, pressure point correctness), compliance with 2015 ERC guideline criteria for high-quality chest compressions (frequency, proportion of recommended pressure depth and compression-ventilation ratio) and user satisfaction (by standardized questionnaire).Results All devices performed comparable to stationary use. Displacement rates ranged from 83% (AM) to 11% (L2). Two incorrect pressure points occurred over 15,962 compressions (0.013%). Guideline-compliant pressure depth was > 90% in all devices and compression-ventilation ratio was 40% (AM), 87% (CC, L2 respectively) and 93% (AP). Electrically powered devices showed constant frequencies while muscle-powered AM showed more variability (median 100/min, interquartile range 9). Although physical effort of AM use was comparable (median 4.0 vs. 4.5 on visual scale), participants preferred electrical devices.Conclusion All devices showed good to very good performance although device-stability, guideline compliance and user satisfaction varied by design. Our results underline the importance to check stability and connection to patient under transport.

Manual CPR Vs Mechanical CPR: Which One Is More Effective During Ambulance Transport?

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
İshak Şan ◽  
Burak Bekgöz ◽  
Mehmet Ergin ◽  
Eren Usul
Keyword(s):  
Chest Compression ◽  
Training Model ◽  
Chest Compressions ◽  
Compression Depth ◽  
Compression Device ◽  
Mechanical Chest Compression ◽  
Ambulance Transport ◽  
Mechanical Cpr ◽  
Off Time ◽  
Trial Setting

Abstract Objectives We aimed to evaluate and compare the qualities of chest compressions performed manually by healthcare professionals and by a mechanical chest compression device on a training model during an ambulance transfer. DesignThis is an experimental trial. Setting This study was performed by the EMS of Ankara City (Capital of Turkey). 20 (10 male and 10 female) paramedic participated the study. We used LUCAS 2 as mechanical chest compression device in the study. A total of 40 rounds were driven on the track; in that moving ambulance, the model was applied chest compression in 20 rounds by paramedics, while in 20 rounds were applied by mechanical chest compression device. The depth, rate and hands-off time of chest compression were measured by means of the model's recording system. Results The median chest compression rate was 120.1 compressions per minute (IQR 25–75%=117.9–133.5) for the paramedics, whereas it was 102.3 compressions per minute for the mechanical chest compression device (IQR 25–75%=102.1–102.7) (p<0.001). The median chest compression depth was 38.9 millimeters (IQR 25–75%=32.9–45.5) for the paramedics, whereas it was 52.7 millimeters for the mechanical chest compression device (IQR 25–75%=51.8–55.0) (p<0.001). The median hands-off time during cardiopulmonary resuscitation was 6.9% (IQR 25–75=5.0–10.1%) for the paramedics and 9% (IQR 25–75%=8.2–12.5%) (p=0.09). Conclusion Chest compressions performed by the mechanical chest compression device were found to be within the range recommended by the guidelines in terms of both speed and duration.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document