Effects of Changes in Inspiratory Time on Inspiratory Flowrate and Airway Pressure during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Manikin-Based Study

Objectives: Given that cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is an aerosol-generating procedure, it is necessary to use a mechanical ventilator and reduce the number of providers involved in resuscitation for in-hospital cardiac arrest in coronavirus disease (COVID-19) patients or suspected COVID-19 patients. However, no study assessed the effect of changes in inspiratory time on flowrate and airway pressure during CPR. We herein aimed to determine changes in these parameters during CPR and identify appropriate ventilator management for adults during CPR.Methods: We measured changes in tidal volume (Vt), peak inspiratory flow rate (PIFR), peak airway pressure (Ppeak), mean airway pressure (Pmean) according to changes in inspiratory time (0.75 s, 1.0 s and 1.5 s) with or without CPR. Vt of 500 mL was supplied (flowrate: 10 times/min) using a mechanical ventilator. Chest compressions were maintained at constant compression depth (53 ± 2 mm) and speed (102 ± 2/min) using a mechanical chest compression device.Results: Median levels of respiratory physiological parameters during CPR were significantly different according to the inspiratory time (0.75 s vs. 1.5 s): PIFR (80.8 [73.3 – 87.325] vs. 70.5 [67 – 72.4] L/min, P < 0.001), Ppeak (54 [48 – 59] vs. 47 [45 – 49] cmH₂O, P < 0.001), and Pmean (3.9 [3.6 – 4.1] vs. 5.7 [5.6 – 5.8] cmH₂O, P < 0.001).Conclusions: Changes in PIFR, Ppeak, and Pmean were associated with inspiratory time. PIFR and Ppeak values tended to decrease with increase in inspiratory time, while Pmean showed a contrasting trend. Increased inspiratory time in low-compliance cardiac arrest patients will help in reducing lung injury during adult CPR.

Can a Glove-Coach Technology Significantly Increase the Efficacy of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation on Non-healthcare Professionals? A Controlled Trial

Introduction: Cardiovascular accidents are the world's leading cause of death. A good quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) can reduce cardiac arrest-associated mortality. This study aims to test the coaching system of a wearable glove, providing instructions during out-of-hospital CPR.Materials and Methods: We performed a single-blind, controlled trial to test non-healthcare professionals during a simulated CPR performed on an electronic mannequin. The no-glove group was the control. The primary outcome was to compare the accuracy of depth and frequency of two simulated CPR sessions. Secondary outcomes were to compare the decay of CPR performance and the percentage of the duration of accurate CPR.Results: About 130 volunteers were allocated to 1:1 ratio in both groups; mean age was 36 ± 15 years (min–max 21–64) and 62 (48%) were men; 600 chest compressions were performed, and 571 chest compressions were analyzed. The mean frequency in the glove group was 117.67 vs. 103.02 rpm in the control group (p &lt; 0.001). The appropriate rate cycle was 92.4% in the glove group vs. 71% in the control group, with a difference of 21.4% (p &lt; 0.001). Mean compression depth in the glove group was 52.11 vs. 55.17 mm in the control group (p &lt; 0.001). A mean reduction of compression depth over time of 5.3 mm/min was observed in the control group vs. 0.83 mm/min of reduction in the glove group.Conclusion: Visual and acoustic feedbacks provided through the utilization of the glove's coaching system were useful for non-healthcare professionals' CPR performance.

Effect of Acute Exposure to Altitude on the Quality of Chest Compression‐Only Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Helicopter Emergency Medical Services Personnel: A Randomized, Controlled, Single‐Blind Crossover Trial

Background Helicopter emergency medical services personnel operating in mountainous terrain are frequently exposed to rapid ascents and provide cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in the field. The aim of the present trial was to investigate the quality of chest compression only (CCO)‐CPR after acute exposure to altitude under repeatable and standardized conditions. Methods and Results Forty‐eight helicopter emergency medical services personnel were divided into 12 groups of 4 participants; each group was assigned to perform 5 minutes of CCO‐CPR on manikins at 2 of 3 altitudes in a randomized controlled single‐blind crossover design (200, 3000, and 5000 m) in a hypobaric chamber. Physiological parameters were continuously monitored; participants rated their performance and effort on visual analog scales. Generalized estimating equations were performed for variables of CPR quality (depth, rate, recoil, and effective chest compressions) and effects of time, altitude, carryover, altitude sequence, sex, qualification, weight, preacclimatization, and interactions were analyzed. Our trial showed a time‐dependent decrease in chest compression depth ( P =0.036) after 20 minutes at altitude; chest compression depth was below the recommended minimum of 50 mm after 60 to 90 seconds (49 [95% CI, 46–52] mm) of CCO‐CPR. Conclusions This trial showed a time‐dependent decrease in CCO‐CPR quality provided by helicopter emergency medical services personnel during acute exposure to altitude, which was not perceived by the providers. Our findings suggest a reevaluation of the CPR guidelines for providers practicing at altitudes of 3000 m and higher. Mechanical CPR devices could be of help in overcoming CCO‐CPR quality decrease in helicopter emergency medical services missions. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT04138446.

Abstract 13048: A Simple Model to Describe the Relationship Between Compression Force and Depth During CPR

Aim: The relationship between force and depth during manual chest compressions depends on the patient and on the dynamics with which the rescuer applies the force. Force-depth models with many fitting parameters have been proposed making physical interpretation complicated. The aim of this work was to design a simpler force-depth model, accommodating anticipated differences in compression and recoil phases. Materials and Methods: Force and acceleration signals were extracted from out-of-hospital-cardiac arrest (OHCA) defibrillator recordings (TVF&R, OR, USA), equipped with CPR technology. Compression depth and velocity signals were computed from acceleration. We analyzed intervals of 20-s within the 1st min of chest compressions. Our model decomposes the applied force as the sum of an elastic and a damped term, considering different damping coefficients for the compression and recoil phases. Coefficient of elasticity was calculated at the instant of maximum compression depth (null velocity) and damping coefficients at the instants of maximum compression and recoil velocities. The estimated depth signal is shown in the figure. The goodness of the model was assessed through the determination coefficient R 2 . Results: We analyzed 1,074 compressions from 30 OHCA recordings. Median (IQR) compression depth was 4.6 (4.0-5.4) cm; compression rate was 107 (102–113) cpm; coefficient of elasticity was 100.67 (78.95–125.01) N/cm; compression damping coefficient was 2.57 (1.84–3.29) N/(cm/s) and recoil damping coefficient was 3.59 (2.58–4.90) N/(cm/s). Median R 2 was 0.993 (0.984–0.996). Conclusions: This model, derived using fewer parameters, could help with the interpretation of the mechanical properties of the chest during CPR. It may also be useful for the assessment of inter-patient differences with age, sex, and body constitution, as well as of the evolution of elasticity and damping of patient’s chest during the course of resuscitation.

Abstract 12921: One Hand Open Palm Technique for Infant Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Randomized Crossover Study

Introduction: The American Heart Association (AHA) CPR guidelines states that effective chest compression depth, rate and recoil are essential factors for establishment of return of spontaneous circulation. A recent survey from an international pediatric resuscitation collaborative showed that healthcare providers failed to meet the metrics of the AHA guidelines, with the greatest difficulty in achieving targeted chest compression depth in infants. The recommended techniques for infant compression include two finger (TFT) or two-thumb technique (TTT). We hypothesized using the heel of one palm (open palm technique, OPT) in infants will result in improved chest compression depth with decreased provider fatigue. Methods: Each participant performed three techniques including TFT, TTT, and novel open-palm technique (OPT) with randomization for sequence of techniques for each participant. Each technique was performed for 2 minutes followed by a 5-minute rest period on an infant manikin. Data were collected through Zoll R series defibrillators on chest compression depth, rate, and fraction. At the end of the study, each participant filled out a survey for difficulty level, finger fatigue, and rescuer fatigue. Results: Thirty pediatric critical care providers participated in the study consisting of 16 nurses, 9 respiratory therapists, 3 fellows, 2 nurse practitioners. The mean chest compression depth for OPT was significantly deeper (2.61 ± 0.63 cm) in comparison to TFT (2.25 ± 0.54 cm, p= 0.0004) but not significantly deeper in comparison to TTT (2.43 ± 0.46 cm, p= 0.0820). There were no significant differences between the three techniques in chest compression rate or chest compression fraction. The finger fatigue and rescuer fatigue surveys were graded from 0-10 with 10 being the most fatigue. OPT showed significantly less finger and rescuer fatigue in comparison to TTT and TFT (p<0.05). Conclusion: This study demonstrated that OPT generated improved chest compression depth with considerably less rescuer and finger fatigue. However, chest compression depth with all three techniques failed to meet the AHA infant goal of 4 cm. Further research is needed to optimize CPR performance to achieve the targeted chest compression depth in infants.

A Simple Solution to the Cylindrical Indentation of an Elastic Compressible Thin Layer Resting on a Rigid Substrate

In this paper, an analytical model is presented to study the contact that recedes between an elastic thin film that could be compressed and a substrate of rigidity. The surface of rigidity was formed due to cylindrical indentation. The substrate was assumed to be a rough surface without any friction. Further, the contact width of the substrate was derived, and the relationship between the compression force, compression depth, and the compression width was determined using the energy method. Finally, the obtained results were validated using finite element analysis.

Performing Simulated Basic Life Support without Seeing: Blind vs. Blindfolded People

Previous pilot experience has shown the ability of visually impaired and blind people (BP) to learn basic life support (BLS), but no studies have compared their abilities with blindfolded people (BFP) after participating in the same instructor-led, real-time feedback training. Twenty-nine BP and 30 BFP participated in this quasi-experimental trial. Training consisted of a 1 h theoretical and practical training session with an additional 30 min afterwards, led by nurses with prior experience in BLS training of various collectives. Quantitative quality of chest compressions (CC), AED use and BLS sequence were evaluated by means of a simulation scenario. BP’s median time to start CC was less than 35 s. Global and specific components of CC quality were similar between groups, except for compression rate (BFP: 123.4 + 15.2 vs. BP: 110.8 + 15.3 CC/min; p = 0.002). Mean compression depth was below the recommended target in both groups, and optimal CC depth was achieved by 27.6% of blind and 23.3% of blindfolded people (p = 0.288). Time to discharge was significantly longer in BFP than BP (86.0 + 24.9 vs. 66.0 + 27.0 s; p = 0.004). Thus, after an adapted and short training program, blind people were revealed to have abilities comparable to those of blindfolded people in learning and performing the BLS sequence and CC.

CPR with restricted patient access using alternative rescuer positions: a randomised cross-over manikin study simulating the CPR scenario after avalanche burial

Background The aim of this manikin study was to evaluate the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with restricted patient access during simulated avalanche rescue using over-the-head and straddle position as compared to standard position. Methods In this prospective, randomised cross-over study, 25 medical students (64% male, mean age 24) performed single-rescuer CPR with restricted patient access in over-the-head and straddle position using mouth-to-mouth ventilation or pocket mask ventilation. Chest compression depth, rate, hand position, recoil, compression/decompression ratio, hands-off times, tidal volume of ventilation and gastric insufflation were compared to CPR with unrestricted patient access in standard position. Results Only 28% of all tidal volumes conformed to the guidelines (400–800 ml), 59% were below 400 ml and 13% were above 800 ml. There was no significant difference in ventilation parameters when comparing standard to atypical rescuer positions. Participants performed sufficient chest compressions depth in 98.1%, a minimum rate in 94.7%, correct compression recoil in 43.8% and correct hand position in 97.3% with no difference between standard and atypical rescuer positions. In 36.9% hands-off times were longer than 9 s. Conclusions Efficacy of CPR from an atypical rescuer position with restricted patient access is comparable to CPR in standard rescuer position. Our data suggest to start basic life-support before complete extrication in order to reduce the duration of untreated cardiac arrest in avalanche rescue. Ventilation quality provided by lay rescuers may be a limiting factor in resuscitation situations where rescue ventilation is considered essential.

Impact of video quality when evaluating video-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized, controlled simulation trial

Background Although not routinely established during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), video-assisted CPR has been described as beneficial in the communication with emergency medical service (EMS) authorities in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest scenarios. Since the influence of video quality has not been investigated systematically and due to variation of quality of a live-stream video during video-assisted CPR, we investigated the influence of different video quality levels during the evaluation of CPR performance in video sequences. Methods Seven video sequences of CPR performance were recorded in high quality and artificially reduced to medium and low quality afterwards. Video sequences showed either correct CPR performance or one of six typical errors: too low and too high compression rate, superficial and increased compression depth, wrong hand position and incomplete release. Video sequences were randomly assigned to the different quality levels. During the randomised and double-blinded evaluation process, 46 paramedics and 47 emergency physicians evaluated seven video sequences of CPR performance in different quality levels (high, medium and low resolution). Results Of 650 video sequences, CPR performance was evaluable in 98.2%. CPR performance was correctly evaluated in 71.5% at low quality, in 76.8% at medium quality, and in 77.3% at high quality level, showing no significant differences depending on video quality (p = 0.306). In the subgroup analysis, correct classification of increased compression depth showed significant differences depending on video quality (p = 0.006). Further, there were significant differences in correct CPR classification depending on the presented error (p < 0.001). Allegedly errors, that were not shown in the video sequence, were classified in 28.3%, insignificantly depending on video quality. Correct evaluation did not show significant interprofessional differences (p = 0.468). Conclusion Video quality has no significant impact on the evaluation of CPR in a video sequence. Even low video quality leads to an acceptable rate of correct evaluation of CPR performance. There is a significant difference in evaluation of CPR performance depending on the presented error in a video sequence. Trial registration German Clinical Trial Register (Registration number DRKS00015297) Registered on 2018-08-21.