scholarly journals Clostridium perfringens as Foodborne Pathogen in Broiler Production: Pathophysiology and Potential Strategies for Controlling Necrotic Enteritis

Animals ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 1718
Author(s):  
Zuamí Villagrán-de la Mora ◽  
María Esther Macías-Rodríguez ◽  
Jenny Arratia-Quijada ◽  
Yesica Sughey Gonzalez-Torres ◽  
Karla Nuño ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clostridium Perfringens ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Foodborne Pathogen ◽  
Dietary Factors ◽  
Necrotic Enteritis ◽  
Growth Promoters ◽  
Immunological Responses ◽  
Poultry Products ◽  
Source Of Infection ◽  
Antibiotic Growth Promoters

Clostridium perfringens (Cp.) is the cause of human foodborne desease. Meat and poultry products are identified as the main source of infection for humans. Cp. can be found in poultry litter, feces, soil, dust, and healthy birds’ intestinal contents. Cp. strains are known to secrete over 20 identified toxins and enzymes that could potentially be the principal virulence factors, capable of degrading mucin, affecting enterocytes, and the small intestine epithelium, involved in necrotic enteritis (NE) pathophysiology, also leading to immunological responses, microbiota modification and anatomical changes. Different environmental and dietary factors can determine the colonization of this microorganism. It has been observed that the incidence of Cp-associated to NE in broilers has increased in countries that have stopped using antibiotic growth promoters. Since the banning of such antibiotic growth promoters, several strategies for Cp. control have been proposed, including dietary modifications, probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, phytogenics, organic acids, and vaccines. However, there are aspects of the pathology that still need to be clarified to establish better actions to control and prevention. This paper reviews the current knowledge about Cp. as foodborne pathogen, the pathophysiology of NE, and recent findings on potential strategies for its control.

scholarly journals Pretreatment with probiotics ameliorate gut health and necrotic enteritis in broiler chickens, a substitute to antibiotics

AMB Express ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Danish Sharafat Rajput ◽  
Dong Zeng ◽  
Abdul Khalique ◽  
Samia Sharafat Rajput ◽  
Hesong Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Broiler Chickens ◽  
Production Systems ◽  
Economic Losses ◽  
Necrotic Enteritis ◽  
Poultry Production ◽  
Gut Health ◽  
Growth Promoters ◽  
Broiler Performance ◽  
Antibiotic Growth Promoters ◽  
Microbial Strains

AbstractNecrotic enteritis (NE) is being considered as one of the most important intestinal diseases in the recent poultry production systems, which causes huge economic losses globally. NE is caused by Clostridium perfringens, a pathogenic bacterium, and normal resident of the intestinal microflora of healthy broiler chickens. Gastrointestinal tract (GIT) of broiler chicken is considered as the most integral part of pathogen’s entrance, their production and disease prevention. Interaction between C. perfringens and other pathogens such as Escherichia coli and Salmonella present in the small intestine may contribute to the development of NE in broiler chickens. The antibiotic therapy was used to treat the NE; however European Union has imposed a strict ban due to the negative implications of drug resistance. Moreover, antibiotic growth promoters cause adverse effects on human health as results of withdrawal of antibiotic residues in the chicken meat. After restriction on use of antibiotics, numerous studies have been carried out to investigate the alternatives to antibiotics for controlling NE. Thus, possible alternatives to prevent NE are bio-therapeutic agents (Probiotics), prebiotics, organic acids and essential oils which help in nutrients digestion, immunity enhancement and overall broiler performance. Recently, probiotics are extensively used alternatives to antibiotics for improving host health status and making them efficient in production. The aim of review is to describe a replacement to antibiotics by using different microbial strains as probiotics such as bacteria and yeasts etc. having bacteriostatic properties which inhibit growth of pathogens and neutralize the toxins by different modes of action.

scholarly journals Modulation of the Immune Response to Improve Health and Reduce Foodborne Pathogens in Poultry

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Swaggerty ◽  
Todd Callaway ◽  
Michael Kogut ◽  
Andrea Piva ◽  
Ester Grilli
Keyword(s):  
Immune Response ◽  
Immune System ◽  
Foodborne Pathogens ◽  
Feed Additive ◽  
Gut Health ◽  
Growth Promoters ◽  
Poultry Products ◽  
Antibiotic Growth Promoters ◽  
Increasing Demand ◽  
Production Animals

Salmonella and Campylobacter are the two leading causes of bacterial-induced foodborne illness in the US. Food production animals including cattle, swine, and chickens are transmission sources for both pathogens. The number of Salmonella outbreaks attributed to poultry has decreased. However, the same cannot be said for Campylobacter where 50–70% of human cases result from poultry products. The poultry industry selects heavily on performance traits which adversely affects immune competence. Despite increasing demand for poultry, regulations and public outcry resulted in the ban of antibiotic growth promoters, pressuring the industry to find alternatives to manage flock health. One approach is to incorporate a program that naturally enhances/modulates the bird’s immune response. Immunomodulation of the immune system can be achieved using a targeted dietary supplementation and/or feed additive to alter immune function. Science-based modulation of the immune system targets ways to reduce inflammation, boost a weakened response, manage gut health, and provide an alternative approach to prevent disease and control foodborne pathogens when conventional methods are not efficacious or not available. The role of immunomodulation is just one aspect of an integrated, coordinated approach to produce healthy birds that are also safe and wholesome products for consumers.

scholarly journals Antimicrobial Susceptibility and Association with Toxin Determinants in Clostridium perfringens Isolates from Chickens

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 1825
Author(s):  
Bai Wei ◽  
Se-Yeoun Cha ◽  
Jun-Feng Zhang ◽  
Ke Shang ◽  
Hae-Chul Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Resistance ◽  
Clostridium Perfringens ◽  
Clinical Signs ◽  
Toxin Gene ◽  
Necrotic Enteritis ◽  
Growth Promoters ◽  
Complete Understanding ◽  
Toxin Genes ◽  
Antimicrobial Growth Promoters ◽  
Selection Of

The aim of the present study was to investigate variation in antimicrobial resistance in Clostridium perfringens (C. perfringens) isolated from chickens after withdrawal of antimicrobial growth promoters (AGPs); and to investigate the correlation between the presence of toxin genes (cpb2, netB, and tpeL) and antimicrobial resistance. Altogether, 162 isolates of C. perfringens were obtained from chickens displaying clinical signs of necrotic enteritis (n = 65) and from healthy chickens (n = 97) in Korea during 2010–2016. Compared to before AGP withdrawal, increased antimicrobial resistance or MIC50/MIC90 value was observed for nine antimicrobials including penicillin, tetracycline, tylosin, erythromycin, florfenicol, enrofloxacin, monensin, salinomycin, and maduramycin. Significantly (p < 0.05) higher resistance to gentamicin, clindamycin, and virginiamycin was found in isolates from chickens with necrotic enteritis compared to those from healthy chickens. tpeL gene was not detected in C. perfringens isolates from healthy chickens. A correlation between toxin gene prevalence and antibiotic resistance was found in the C. perfringens isolates. Because the usage of antimicrobials may contribute to the selection of both resistance and toxin genes, these can potentially make it challenging to control antimicrobial resistance in pathogenic colonies. Therefore, a more complete understanding of the interplay between resistance and virulence genes is required.

scholarly journals Antibacterial activity of Bacillus species-derived surfactin on Brachyspira hyodysenteriae and Clostridium perfringens

AMB Express ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi-Bing Horng ◽  
Yu-Hsiang Yu ◽  
Andrzej Dybus ◽  
Felix Shih-Hsiang Hsiao ◽  
Yeong-Hsiang Cheng
Keyword(s):  
Antibacterial Activity ◽  
Clostridium Perfringens ◽  
Animal Husbandry ◽  
Feed Additives ◽  
Bacillus Species ◽  
Necrotic Enteritis ◽  
Growth Promoters ◽  
Bacterial Killing ◽  
Brachyspira Hyodysenteriae ◽  
Potential Alternative

AbstractSwine dysentery and necrotic enteritis are a bane to animal husbandry worldwide. Some countries have already banned the use of antibiotics as growth promoters in animal production. Surfactin is a potential alternative to antibiotics and antibacterial agents. However, the antibacterial activity of Bacillus species-derived surfactin on Brachyspira hyodysenteriae and Clostridium perfringens are still poorly understood. In the current study, the antibacterial effects of surfactin produced from Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus licheniformis on B. hyodysenteriae and C. perfringens were evaluated. Results showed that multiple surfactin isoforms were detected in B. subtilis, while only one surfactin isoform was detected in B. licheniformis fermented products. The surfactin produced from B. subtilis exhibited significant antibacterial activity against B. hyodysenteriae compared with surfactin produced from B. licheniformis. B. subtilis-derived surfactin could inhibit bacterial growth and disrupt the morphology of B. hyodysenteriae. Furthermore, the surfactin produced from B. subtilis have the highest activity against C. perfringens growth. In contrast, B. licheniformis fermented product-derived surfactin had a strong bacterial killing activity against C. perfringens compared with surfactin produced from B. subtilis. These results together suggest that Bacillus species-derived surfactin have potential for development as feed additives and use as a possible substitute for antibiotics to prevent B. hyodysenteriae and C. perfringens-associated disease in the animal industry.

scholarly journals Phytogenic Compounds for Enhancing Intestinal Barrier Function in Poultry–A Review

Planta Medica ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Urszula Latek ◽  
Magdalena Chłopecka ◽  
Wojciech Karlik ◽  
Marta Mendel
Keyword(s):  
Barrier Function ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Intestinal Barrier ◽  
Feed Additives ◽  
Intestinal Barrier Function ◽  
Poultry Production ◽  
Gut Health ◽  
Growth Promoters ◽  
Gut Barrier Function ◽  
Antibiotic Growth Promoters

AbstractAfter the European Union ban of antibiotic growth promoters, works on different methods of improving gut health have intensified. The poultry industry is struggling with problems that were previously controlled by antibiotic growth promoters, therefore the search for optimal solutions continues. Simultaneously, there is also increasing social pressure to minimize the use of antibiotics and replace them with alternative feed additives. A variety of available alternatives is considered safe by consumers, among which phytogenics play a significant role. However, there are still some limitations that need to be considered. The most questionable are the issues related to bioavailability, metabolism of plant derivatives in birds, and the difficulty of standardizing commercial products. There is still a need for more evidence-based recommendations for the use of phytogenics in livestock. On the other hand, a positive influence of phytogenic compounds on the health of poultry has been previously described by many researchers and practical application of these compounds has auspicious perspectives in poultry production. Supplementation with phytogenic feed additives has been shown to protect birds from various environmental threats leading to impaired intestinal barrier function. Phytogenic feed additives have the potential to improve the overall structure of intestinal mucosa as well as gut barrier function on a molecular level. Recognition of the phytogenicsʼ effect on the components of the intestinal barrier may enable the selection of the most suitable ones to alleviate negative effects of different agents. This review aims to summarize current knowledge of the influence of various phytogenic constituents on the intestinal barrier and health of poultry.

scholarly journals Global Restriction of Using Antibiotic Growth Promoters and Alternative Strategies in Poultry Production

2018 ◽  
Vol 101 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hossan MD. Salim ◽  
Khan Shahidul Huque ◽  
Kazi M. Kamaruddin ◽  
Anwarul Haque Beg
Keyword(s):  
Value Chain ◽  
Value Added ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Feed Additives ◽  
Production Performance ◽  
Poultry Production ◽  
Health Food ◽  
Growth Promoters ◽  
Poultry Products ◽  
Antibiotic Growth Promoters

A growing global concern of antibiotic use in poultry diets due to its potential adverse effects on birds and human health, food safety and the environment has led to a complete ban or restricted use in some countries, and, at the same time, expanding options for the use of alternative feed additives. Multiple, rather than a single additive may replace antibiotic growth promoters (AGPs) in poultry. Blending of feeding additives and hygienic farm management, vaccination and biosecurity may help achieve good intestinal health, stabilise enteric ecosystems and result in sustainable and cost effective production performance of birds. Moreover, controlling unsolicited ingredients at the production level must have the support of different markets responsible for the supply of safe and quality poultry products for consumers. This requires the further increase and diversification of value added poultry products and the expansion of their markets through strategic planning and gradual limitation of live bird markets. More research is warranted in order to explore suitable, reliable and cost effective alternatives to AGPs for commercial use, and strategic poultry value chain development.

scholarly journals Alternatives to antibiotics for maximizing growth performance and feed efficiency in poultry: a review

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
U. Gadde ◽  
W. H. Kim ◽  
S. T. Oh ◽  
Hyun S. Lillehoj
Keyword(s):  
Mechanism Of Action ◽  
Feed Efficiency ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Growth Promoters ◽  
Beneficial Effects ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Poultry Products ◽  
Genetic Potential ◽  
Antibiotic Growth Promoters ◽  
And Performance

AbstractWith the increase in regulations regarding the use of antibiotic growth promoters and the rise in consumer demand for poultry products from ‘Raised Without Antibiotics’ or ‘No Antibiotics Ever’ flocks, the quest for alternative products or approaches has intensified in recent years. A great deal of research has focused on the development of antibiotic alternatives to maintain or improve poultry health and performance. This review describes the potential for the various alternatives available to increase animal productivity and help poultry perform to their genetic potential under existing commercial conditions. The classes of alternatives described include probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, organic acids, enzymes, phytogenics, antimicrobial peptides, hyperimmune egg antibodies, bacteriophages, clay, and metals. A brief description of the mechanism of action, efficacy, and advantages and disadvantages of their uses are also presented. Though the beneficial effects of many of the alternatives developed have been well demonstrated, the general consensus is that these products lack consistency and the results vary greatly from farm to farm. Furthermore, their mode of action needs to be better defined. Optimal combinations of various alternatives coupled with good management and husbandry practices will be the key to maximize performance and maintain animal productivity, while we move forward with the ultimate goal of reducing antibiotic use in the animal industry.

scholarly journals Significance of Endogenous Antimicrobial Peptides on the Health of Food Animals

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yewande O. Fasina ◽  
Temitayo Obanla ◽  
George Dosu ◽  
Sierra Muzquiz
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Peptides ◽  
Research Evidence ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Acquired Resistance ◽  
Innate Immune ◽  
Immunomodulatory Activity ◽  
Protective Effects ◽  
Growth Promoters ◽  
Antibiotic Growth Promoters ◽  
Food Animals

Acquired resistance to in-feed antibiotic growth promoters continues to be an imperative problem in the livestock industries, thereby necessitating continuous pursuit for alternatives. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) represent a critical part of the host's innate immune system and have been documented to have immunomodulatory activity. Increasing research evidence suggests that in contrast to antibiotics, AMPs exert broad-spectrum antibacterial activity in a manner that reduces bacterial acquisition of resistance genes. This review summarizes current knowledge on the protective effects of endogenous (natural) AMPs in the gastrointestinal tract of food animals. Factors limiting the efficacy of these AMPs were also discussed and mitigating strategies were proposed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document