scholarly journals Multi Vehicle-Type Right Turning Gap-Acceptance and Capacity Analysis at Uncontrolled Urban Intersections

2018 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Doddapaneni Abhigna ◽  
Dipak P. Brahmankar ◽  
Kodavanti Venkata Raghavendra Ravishankar

Intersections are the critical zones where conflicting, merging and diverging movements influence the intersection capacity. Uncontrolled intersections in particular pose dangerous situations to vehicular traffic. During peak vehicular flow, the unpredictable crossing behavior of minor stream vehicles induces delay and reduces the capacity of the intersection. Capacity at uncontrolled intersections is typically measured either by gap acceptance method, empirical regression approaches and conflict technique. Gap acceptance is an important characteristic for analyzing uncontrolled intersections. The behavior of different vehicle types and gap of subject vehicle type from minor street taking right turn to merge with major traffic stream is analyzed using gap acceptance method. The objective of the current study is to analyze the effect of major stream vehicle type combinations on the minor stream vehicle gap-acceptance behavior and to determine the capacity of the minor stream taking into account the influence of the right turning vehicles. The capacity of minor stream calculated using Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 2010, Luttenin’s model, and Tanner’s model are compared. It is observed that two wheelers are more aggressive than three wheelers for most of the major stream vehicular combinations observed in this study.

2000 ◽  
Vol 1710 (1) ◽  
pp. 199-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuewen Le ◽  
Jian Lu ◽  
Edward A. Mierzejewski ◽  
Yanhu Zhou

The capacity analysis procedure for signalized intersections included in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) needs to consider the area type of a given intersection. The area-type adjustment factor used in the procedure is based on conclusions from a limited number of studies. In addition, the procedure for using an area-type adjustment factor is not well defined in the HCM. A study undertaken in central Florida to study the effects of four different area types on the capacity of signalized intersections is summarized. These four area types include recreational, business, residential, and shopping. Study results indicated that differences in saturation headways among different area types were significant. The saturation headways observed in recreational areas were significantly higher than those in other areas for both left-turn and through movements. The through-movement saturation headways obtained in residential, shopping, and business areas were not significantly different. This study resulted in a new area-type adjustment factor of 0.92 for recreational areas, whereas the factor is 1.00 for other areas. Results in this study also indicated that the differences in start-up lost time among different area types were not significantly different. In addition, according to the results of the analysis, 75 percent of the yellow interval in undersaturated conditions and 35 percent of the yellow interval in oversaturated conditions were found to be unused and considered clearance lost time.


Author(s):  
Abishai Polus ◽  
Sitvanit Shmueli

Roundabouts are replacing conventional unsignalized intersections in many parts of the world and could become more widespread in the United States, although there are some limitations as well as clear advantages. Models for entry capacity into the rotary were developed. Entry capacity depends on the geometric characteristics of the roundabout, particularly the diameter of the outside circle of the intersection. The geometric characteristics determine the speed of vehicles around the central island and, therefore, have an impact on the gap-acceptance process and consequently the capacity. Traffic conditions that impede entry capacity involve the flow around the roundabout. Flow and geometric data from six small to medium-sized roundabouts were analyzed. Individual and aggregated entry-capacity models were calibrated by using the diameter and circulating flows as explanatory variables. Very good fits to the data were obtained; the results also fit models developed in other countries. The Australian model resulted in slightly higher entry capacities for moderate to low circulating flows and lower entry capacities for high circulating flows. Very close proximity to the German model was obtained, although it does not depend on the geometric characteristics of the circle. The roundabout provides an advantage over a conventional unsignalized intersection. A faithful concurrence between the model developed and the latest Highway Capacity Manual model for right-turn capacity at an unsignalized intersection is obtained if the circulating flow is replaced by the conflicting flow. The advantage of entry capacities of the roundabout over the calculated capacities of the Highway Capacity Manual left-turn model is shown. Further research is proposed to study the effect on entry capacity of two circulating lanes rather than one and the effect of the increase in circulating flows on the gap-acceptance process, particularly the reduction in critical gap at high flows.


Author(s):  
Rod Troutbeck

The background to the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) section on the analysis of the performance of roundabouts is discussed. The paper has two main objectives: to discuss the background of different techniques used to evaluate the level of service and to describe the method included in the HCM. The paper is in two parts. In the first part, the first objective is addressed and the parameters needed to predict both delay and capacity, which in turn are used to evaluate the level of service, are described. It is concluded that the gap acceptance approach is a reasonable one when the performance of roundabouts is predicted using data from uncongested sites. If there are a significant number of roundabouts with congested approaches, an empirical model should be used. It is also concluded that the results from one country cannot be immediately transferred to another. In the second part of the paper, the recommended practice included in HCM Chapter 10 is given.


1997 ◽  
Vol 1572 (1) ◽  
pp. 131-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ghassan Abu-Lebdeh ◽  
Rahim F. Benekohal ◽  
Bashar Al-Omari

Models to estimate right-turn-on-red (RTOR) volumes at intersections with exclusive right-turn (RT) lanes are developed, and the effects of RTOR volumes on computed delay are assessed. The important variables in these models are the RT volume, followed by green-time-to-cycle (G/C) ratio, volume of conflicting traffic, and whether there is a protected phase for opposing left-turning vehicles. The estimated RTOR increased as the RTs increased. However, it decreased as G/C and the volume of conflicting traffic increased. Results show that not accounting for RTOR volumes can lead to a significant difference in delay estimates for RT lanes and, to a lesser extent, on the corresponding approaches. For RT lanes, in one-half of the cases the difference was greater than 5 percent, in more than one-quarter of the cases the difference was greater than 10 percent, and in at least one of eight cases the difference was greater than 20 percent. Differences for individual cases ranged between 0 and 130 percent, with an average of 12 percent. For approaches, the average delay difference was 4 percent, and for individual cases the difference ranged between −2 and 78 percent. As recommended by the Highway Capacity Manual, actual field counts of RTOR volume should be used whenever available. However, in the absence of such counts, the models developed here can be used and hence should be considered in capacity analysis procedures.


Author(s):  
Werner Brilon ◽  
Ning Wu

Chapter 17 of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 2000 provides a method for analyzing a two-stage priority process at unsignalized intersections, which provide a wide median in the major street. In the HCM itself, the method is described rather briefly. This briefness could give rise to misunderstanding, and practitioners might avoid using the procedure altogether. Therefore, the analytical background of the procedure and the correct application of the parameters are explained in greater detail. Moreover, graphical representations have been developed to replace the difficult formulas, significantly simplifying application in the field. The method also has some limitations, which should be taken into account in practical application. Thus, this paper is something like a comment on the method described in the HCM 2000, besides providing some enhancements that allow easier application in practice.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2615 (1) ◽  
pp. 123-131
Author(s):  
Liang Shi ◽  
Panos D. Prevedouros

Driverless cars (DLCs) are vehicles capable of managing several driving tasks by themselves under different degrees of human intervention. DLCs are able to maintain shorter headways in entering a roundabout and circulating in the roundabout. The Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) provides a regression-based gap acceptance model for estimating the capacity of roundabouts. The gap acceptance model captures driver behavior, which is characterized by headways. As automotive manufacturers and technology companies develop driverless capabilities for roadway vehicles, DLCs at various traffic compositions will likely have different effects on the traffic operation of roundabouts. This paper presents the operational analysis for a single-lane roundabout with driverless vehicles under different traffic compositions. Considering the uncertainty of the technological capabilities and the legal and behavioral acceptability of DLCs, sensitivity analyses were conducted. The simulation results for one sample case study show that when the roundabout operates at a Level of Service B (LOS B) or better, DLCs will not have an effect on either the capacity or the control delay. A reduction in control delay will occur when DLCs are set with shorter headways (as assumed for the connected DLC) under low traffic composition (1% to 10%) on a single-lane roundabout operating near capacity. When the share is below 1%, the effect of DLCs is very small. When the LOS of the roundabout approaches E, more reduction in delay is expected when the portion of DLCs in traffic increases.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wonho Suh ◽  
Jung In Kim ◽  
Hyunmyung Kim ◽  
Joonho Ko ◽  
Young-Joo Lee

This paper investigates roundabout capacity analysis using mathematical modelling and microscopic simulation. The capacity in approach section in roundabout is calculated by estimating the number of vehicles that can enter a roundabout for a given approach given a certain circulating volume. Since roundabouts are working with only yield conditions, capacity is dependent on gap acceptance model. Priority rules are used to simulate the gap acceptance model and define the right-of-way for conflicting movements. In the case of roundabouts, priority rules can be utilized to establish right-of-way at each of the conflict points where the approach traffic merges with the circulating traffic of the roundabout. By altering the minimum acceptable gap and related parameters, it is possible to calibrate a simulation model to be that of a real-life roundabout or that of a theoretical roundabout that meets the operating characteristics defined in current capacity models. The proposed roundabout capacity analysis methodology is expected to assist modelling operational conditions for roundabouts. Results are presented that provide evidence to validate the proposed approach.


Author(s):  
Madhav V. Chitturi ◽  
Rahim F. Benekohal

Traffic data were collected from 11 work zones on Interstate highways in Illinois in which one of the two lanes was open. The reductions in free-flow speed (FFS) due to narrow lanes and lateral clearances in work zones were studied. It was found that the reductions in FFSs of vehicles in work zones because of narrow lanes were higher than the reductions given in the Highway Capacity Manual for basic freeway sections. The data also showed that the narrower the lane was, the greater the speed reduction was. The data showed that the FFSs of heavy vehicles were statistically lower than the FFSs of passenger cars, even though the speed limit was the same for both types of vehicles. In addition, the reduction in the FFSs of heavy vehicles was greater than the reduction in the FFSs of passenger cars. This greater reduction in the speed of heavy vehicles affected the performance of the traffic stream in work zones. Thus, it should be considered in the computation of the passenger car equivalence for heavy vehicles. It is recommended that 10, 7, 4.4, and 2.1 mph be used for speed reduction in work zones for lane widths of 10, 10.5, 11, and 11.5 ft, respectively.


2018 ◽  
Vol 159 ◽  
pp. 01013
Author(s):  
Basuki Kami Hari ◽  
Purwanto Djoko

The aims of this study are to evaluate the the right-turn coefficients at intersection capasity formula by Indonesia Highway Capacity Manual (MKJI 1997). Therefore, it is necessary for analysis that examines right-turn coefficient values in intersection capacity function. The simulation with many various geometric intersections defined by many scenarios using vehicle tracking application program, which increase the space maneuver vehicle at the intersection includes: 1) widen approach lane; 2) add a right-turn lane; and 3) backward median in each approach. Intersection performance Analysis will produce degree of saturation that is affected by right-turn coefficient according to the simulated vehicle maneuver using new formula. The study can be concluded that the intersection changes the right-turn factor adjustment which was originally set with the value based on linear function being a log function. According to the new function, Prt Less 2,5% right turn vehicle make significant decrease of intersection capacity, that why, it makes many conflict based on opposite traffic from other approach. In the other side, if Prt more then 2,5%, it makes increase intersection capacity because intersection space used to right turn vehicles.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document