Operational Analysis of a Single-Lane Roundabout with a Mix of Driverless Vehicles

2017 ◽  
Vol 2615 (1) ◽  
pp. 123-131
Author(s):  
Liang Shi ◽  
Panos D. Prevedouros
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Gap Acceptance ◽  
Highway Capacity ◽  
Highway Capacity Manual ◽  
Control Delay ◽  
Operational Analysis ◽  
Traffic Composition ◽  
Acceptance Model ◽  
Traffic Operation

Driverless cars (DLCs) are vehicles capable of managing several driving tasks by themselves under different degrees of human intervention. DLCs are able to maintain shorter headways in entering a roundabout and circulating in the roundabout. The Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) provides a regression-based gap acceptance model for estimating the capacity of roundabouts. The gap acceptance model captures driver behavior, which is characterized by headways. As automotive manufacturers and technology companies develop driverless capabilities for roadway vehicles, DLCs at various traffic compositions will likely have different effects on the traffic operation of roundabouts. This paper presents the operational analysis for a single-lane roundabout with driverless vehicles under different traffic compositions. Considering the uncertainty of the technological capabilities and the legal and behavioral acceptability of DLCs, sensitivity analyses were conducted. The simulation results for one sample case study show that when the roundabout operates at a Level of Service B (LOS B) or better, DLCs will not have an effect on either the capacity or the control delay. A reduction in control delay will occur when DLCs are set with shorter headways (as assumed for the connected DLC) under low traffic composition (1% to 10%) on a single-lane roundabout operating near capacity. When the share is below 1%, the effect of DLCs is very small. When the LOS of the roundabout approaches E, more reduction in delay is expected when the portion of DLCs in traffic increases.

scholarly journals Optimizing Traffic Operation in Designing Specific Upgrades

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Ebrahim Sangsefidi ◽  
Mohammadjafar Rashidbenam ◽  
Shahab Kabiri ◽  
Hossein Amid ◽  
Maryam Sangsefidi
Keyword(s):  
Modern Society ◽  
Heavy Vehicles ◽  
Highway Capacity ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
Highway Capacity Manual ◽  
Profile View ◽  
Traffic Composition ◽  
Traffic Operation ◽  
Optimum Profile

Transport forms one of the primary needs in all categories of the population in modern society; it is of paramount concern for traffic engineers, transport planners, and policy makers to understand and evaluate the quality of service being provided by the transport facilities designed by them. This paper presents an investigation in profile geometric design and traffic flow operation on two-lane two-way highways and provides analyses that will help in a better understanding of traffic operation on these facilities to select the optimum profile configuration. The effects of influencing parameters consisting of grade, length of grade, traffic composition, and traffic volume are evaluated and finally a systematic procedure to evaluate flow rate under the base condition is presented. Finally, based on these achievements an algorithm is introduced to select optimum Finished Ground of profile view. Results show that the percentage of heavy vehicles has a contributing effect on traffic operation so that the optimum profile configuration is incredibly affected by this factor. Source data have been obtained from Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) as a pioneer document in respect of quantifying the concept of capacity for a transport facility.

Impact of Geometric Factors on the Capacity of Single-Lane Roundabouts

2018 ◽  
Vol 2672 (34) ◽  
pp. 10-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark T. Johnson ◽  
Ting-Li Lin
Keyword(s):  
Geometric Model ◽  
Gap Acceptance ◽  
Highway Capacity ◽  
Aggregated Data ◽  
Highway Capacity Manual ◽  
Project Assessment ◽  
Capacity Model ◽  
Acceptance Model ◽  
Capacity Data ◽  
Geometric Variation

Roundabout capacity is primarily estimated by gap-acceptance or by geometric models. The 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM 10) uses a gap-acceptance model developed by Siegloch with empirically derived values of critical gap and headway for single-lane and two-lane entries. A geometric capacity model was developed by Kimber and Hollis that diverged from gap-based models. The capacity of up to four lane entries was empirically derived from six geometric parameters. In 2012 capacity data were collected as part of the FHWA project, Assessment of Roundabout Capacity Models for the Highway Capacity Manual. These data were used to produce HCM6, an update of the HCM 2010. In HCM6, a capacity curve was fitted through all the capacity data for single-lane roundabouts. The large scatter of data about the mean capacity line suggests that the single-lane roundabouts may be separated into different geometric types to improve accuracy. To investigate this hypothesis, the capacity data were separated into two geometrically distinct types of single-lane roundabouts: smaller, compact and larger, curvilinear. The range of data for the disaggregated and aggregated data was compared. Also, a capacity line was derived for each type using the geometric capacity model and compared with the disaggregated data with the HCM6 method. The results demonstrate that differences in geometry, absent in HCM6, explain the wide data range. This was further confirmed by the geometric model that gave a good fit to both sets of data. These results indicate that the accuracy of capacity prediction is improved by including geometric variation.

scholarly journals Development and evaluation of a microscopic overtaking gap acceptance model for two-lane highways

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 573-582 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amir H. Ghods ◽  
Frank F. Saccomanno
Keyword(s):  
Field Data ◽  
Video Recording ◽  
Simulation Models ◽  
Gap Acceptance ◽  
Highway Capacity ◽  
Highway Capacity Manual ◽  
Time To Collision ◽  
Expected Time ◽  
Acceptance Model

A microscopic gap acceptance model is presented that simulates overtaking behavior on two-lane highways. The decision to initiate overtaking is expressed as a function of each driver’s perception of the expected time-to-collision (TTC) with the nearest opposing vehicle at the end of maneuver. The available gap is accepted if the driver’s perception of TTC exceeds a predetermined threshold for safe return (critical TTC). The gap acceptance model is calibrated and validated based on overtaking video-recording data for a two-lane highway. The overtaking gap acceptance model is then compared, for consistency and transferability, with independent aggregate field data, as well as with two other simulation models and values given in the Highway Capacity Manual for similar two-lane highways. The gap acceptance simulation demonstrated that the proposed overtaking model is able to provide reliable measures of traffic attributes for two-lane highway operation, as verified experimentally.

Uncertainty in Operational Analysis of Two-Lane Highways

2002 ◽  
Vol 1802 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Tapio Luttinen
Keyword(s):  
Input Data ◽  
Travel Speed ◽  
Level Of Service ◽  
Model Parameters ◽  
Highway Capacity ◽  
Highway Capacity Manual ◽  
Operational Analysis ◽  
Percent Time ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Percent Time Spent Following

The Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 2000 provides methods to estimate performance measures and the level of service for different types of traffic facilities. Because neither the input data nor the model parameters are totally accurate, there is an element of uncertainty in the results. An analytical method was used to estimate the uncertainty in the service measures of two-lane highways. The input data and the model parameters were considered as random variables. The propagation of error through the arithmetic operations in the HCM 2000 methodology was estimated. Finally, the uncertainty in the average travel speed and percent time spent following was analyzed, and four approaches were considered to deal with uncertainty in the level of service.

Comparison of Planning and Operational Analysis Procedures for Signalized Intersections from the Highway Capacity Manual

1996 ◽  
Vol 1555 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-64
Author(s):  
Mark R. Virkler ◽  
Shashi Gannavaram ◽  
Anand Ramabhadran
Keyword(s):  
Level Of Service ◽  
Signal Timing ◽  
Highway Capacity ◽  
Operational Procedure ◽  
Highway Capacity Manual ◽  
Operational Analysis ◽  
Planning Procedure ◽  
Adjustment Factors ◽  
Cycle Lengths ◽  
Traffic Signal Timing

The 1994 update of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) includes a planning procedure to estimate the capacity condition of a signalized intersection (Xcm). The planning method results can also be extended to a planning application of the more data-intensive HCM operational procedure to estimate intersection critical flow-to-capacity ratio (Xc) and level of service with only planning-level data. Both the planning procedure and the planning application of the operational procedure involve default adjustment factors and synthesized traffic signal timing (called the “default signal timing”). Data from 166 Missouri intersections were used to determine how well the planning approaches predict operational analysis results. In general, the default signal timings had shorter cycle lengths than the timing plans used at pretimed signals. The shorter cycle lengths led to slightly higher flow-to-capacity ratios, since a higher proportion of each cycle was devoted to lost time. The default signal timings also had more equal flow-to-capacity ratios within critical lane groups. The shorter cycle lengths and more equal flow-to-capacity ratios led to a predicted level of service that was the same or better than that calculated for actual conditions. For the subject intersections, locally calibrated default adjustment factors yielded better predictions of flow-to-capacity ratios and level of service than the HCM defaults. The planning value for Xcm was often less than the actual Xc for operational analysis of actual conditions. This was to be expected since Xcm is based on the maximum allowable cycle length. The HCM planning procedure is expected to receive wide use in a variety of planning and design applications. Calibration of appropriate local default values should improve the accuracy of the planning procedure results.

scholarly journals A Novel Methodology for Estimating the Capacity and Level of Service for the New Mega Elliptical Roundabout Intersection

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed I. Z. Mohamed ◽  
Yusheng Ci ◽  
Yiqiu Tan
Keyword(s):  
Geometric Design ◽  
Level Of Service ◽  
Highway Capacity ◽  
Operation Performance ◽  
Highway Capacity Manual ◽  
Federal Highway ◽  
Green Book ◽  
Traffic Operation ◽  
Gap Acceptance Theory ◽  
Better Than

Mega elliptical roundabout is a new intersection on rural multilane highways. This intersection was developed in a previous paper using simulation data, and the authors found that it is better than interchange (full cloverleaf) in most scenarios of traffic flow. Basically, there are no guidelines or procedures for designing mega elliptical roundabout in AASHTO Green Book, Federal Highway Administration guides, and Highway Capacity Manual. Thus, the purpose of this study is to analyze the traffic operation performance and propose a methodology for calculating the capacity of mega elliptical roundabout and also the level of service by gap acceptance theory. Moreover, this research studied the influence of different values of truck ratios and also different values of a major highway speed on geometric design and traffic operation performance for mega elliptical roundabout. To validate the thoroughness of the proposed methodology, VISSIM simulations were conducted. This research will assist practitioners in determining the appropriate geometric design, assessing mega elliptical roundabout intersections, and making comparisons with other alternatives.

Validation of Left-Turn Delay at Two-Way Stop-Controlled Intersections

2000 ◽  
Vol 1710 (1) ◽  
pp. 181-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah A. Simpson ◽  
Judson S. Matthias
Keyword(s):  
Data Sets ◽  
Highway Capacity ◽  
Left Turn ◽  
Highway Capacity Manual ◽  
Control Delay ◽  
Unsignalized Intersections ◽  
Percent Confidence Level ◽  
The One ◽  
And Control ◽  
Control Delays

Control delay for left-turning vehicles at unsignalized intersections was observed in the field and compared with average control delay calculated from the methodologies presented in the 1997 update of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). Unsignalized intersections with two-way left-turn lanes on the major street were observed in the peak and offpeak hours, and control delays were recorded for the one-stage and twostage left-turn processes. Next, the methodologies presented in the HCM were used to calculate the control delay for both processes and compared with the observed data. These comparisons were used as the basis for validation of the HCM methodologies regarding left-turn control delay at unsignalized intersections. From the comparisons, the calculated delay closely corresponds with the observed data, with a total approach volume at the intersection of approximately 2,500 vehicles per hour or less. Once the total approach volume increases above this level, the calculated values rapidly increase and the actual observed control delays gradually increase at a much lower rate. As a result, the observed and calculated delays are different when the intersection handles more than 2,500 approach vehicles in an hour. Statistical analyses were performed on the data to determine if the average observed control delay was related to the calculated control delay. Statistically, the observed control delay and the calculated control delay at the 95 percent confidence level show that the two data sets yield similar results for off-peak conditions. However, during the peak hour, when the total approach volumes are higher, the 95 percent confidence interval yields different results. Hence, the HCM procedures produce, on average, greater control delay estimates than the field observations when the total approach volumes are high.

Analysis and Evaluation of the Capacity of Roundabouts

1997 ◽  
Vol 1572 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abishai Polus ◽  
Sitvanit Shmueli
Keyword(s):  
The United States ◽  
Gap Acceptance ◽  
Highway Capacity ◽  
Left Turn ◽  
Highway Capacity Manual ◽  
Explanatory Variables ◽  
Geometric Characteristics ◽  
Critical Gap ◽  
Unsignalized Intersections ◽  
German Model

Roundabouts are replacing conventional unsignalized intersections in many parts of the world and could become more widespread in the United States, although there are some limitations as well as clear advantages. Models for entry capacity into the rotary were developed. Entry capacity depends on the geometric characteristics of the roundabout, particularly the diameter of the outside circle of the intersection. The geometric characteristics determine the speed of vehicles around the central island and, therefore, have an impact on the gap-acceptance process and consequently the capacity. Traffic conditions that impede entry capacity involve the flow around the roundabout. Flow and geometric data from six small to medium-sized roundabouts were analyzed. Individual and aggregated entry-capacity models were calibrated by using the diameter and circulating flows as explanatory variables. Very good fits to the data were obtained; the results also fit models developed in other countries. The Australian model resulted in slightly higher entry capacities for moderate to low circulating flows and lower entry capacities for high circulating flows. Very close proximity to the German model was obtained, although it does not depend on the geometric characteristics of the circle. The roundabout provides an advantage over a conventional unsignalized intersection. A faithful concurrence between the model developed and the latest Highway Capacity Manual model for right-turn capacity at an unsignalized intersection is obtained if the circulating flow is replaced by the conflicting flow. The advantage of entry capacities of the roundabout over the calculated capacities of the Highway Capacity Manual left-turn model is shown. Further research is proposed to study the effect on entry capacity of two circulating lanes rather than one and the effect of the increase in circulating flows on the gap-acceptance process, particularly the reduction in critical gap at high flows.

Background for HCM Section on Analysis of Performance of Roundabouts

1998 ◽  
Vol 1646 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rod Troutbeck
Keyword(s):  
Empirical Model ◽  
Level Of Service ◽  
Gap Acceptance ◽  
Highway Capacity ◽  
Highway Capacity Manual ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Analysis Of Performance

The background to the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) section on the analysis of the performance of roundabouts is discussed. The paper has two main objectives: to discuss the background of different techniques used to evaluate the level of service and to describe the method included in the HCM. The paper is in two parts. In the first part, the first objective is addressed and the parameters needed to predict both delay and capacity, which in turn are used to evaluate the level of service, are described. It is concluded that the gap acceptance approach is a reasonable one when the performance of roundabouts is predicted using data from uncongested sites. If there are a significant number of roundabouts with congested approaches, an empirical model should be used. It is also concluded that the results from one country cannot be immediately transferred to another. In the second part of the paper, the recommended practice included in HCM Chapter 10 is given.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document