Long-Span Guardrail System for Culvert Applications

2000 ◽  
Vol 1720 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald K. Faller ◽  
Dean L. Sicking ◽  
Karla A. Polivka ◽  
John R. Rohde ◽  
Bob W. Bielenberg
Keyword(s):  
Simulation Modeling ◽  
Research Study ◽  
Full Scale ◽  
Wood Block ◽  
Long Span ◽  
Crash Testing ◽  
Vehicle Crash ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Crash Tests ◽  
Test Level

A long-span guardrail for use over low-fill culverts was developed and successfully crash tested. The guardrail system was configured with 30.48 m of nested, 12-gauge W-beam rail and centered around a 7.62-m-long unsupported span. The nested W-beam rail was supported by 16 W152×13.4 steel posts and 6 standard CRT posts, each with two 150-mm×200×360 mm wood block-outs. Each post was 1830 mm long. Post spacings were 1905 mm on center, except for the 7.62-m spacing between the two CRT posts surrounding the long span. The research study included computer simulation modeling with Barrier VII and full-scale vehicle crash testing, using 3/4-ton (680-kg) pickup trucks in accordance with the Test Level 3 (TL-3) requirements specified in NCHRP Report 350. Three full-scale vehicle crash tests were performed. The first test was unsuccessful because of severe vehicle penetration into the guardrail system. This penetration resulted from a loss of rail tensile capacity during vehicle redirection when the swagged fitting on the cable anchor assembly failed. A second test was performed on the same design, which contained a new cable anchor assembly. During vehicle redirection, the pickup truck rolled over and the test was considered a failure. The long-span system was subsequently redesigned to incorporate double block-outs on the CRT posts and crash tested again. Following the successful third test, the long-span guardrail system was determined to meet TL-3 criteria.

Development of Universal Breakaway Steel Post for Bullnose Median Barrier

2012 ◽  
Vol 2309 (1) ◽  
pp. 94-104
Author(s):  
Robert W. Bielenberg ◽  
Karla A. Lechtenberg ◽  
Dean L. Sicking ◽  
Steve Arens ◽  
Ronald K. Faller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Release ◽  
Full Scale ◽  
Successful Completion ◽  
Safe Alternative ◽  
Long Span ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Crash Tests ◽  
Test Level ◽  
Bolt Steel ◽  
Satisfactory Manner

A new fracturing-bolt universal breakaway steel post (UBSP) was developed and evaluated for use as a replacement for the controlled-release terminal (CRT) wood post currently used in the Thrie beam bullnose system. After numerous steel post concepts were investigated, a fracturing-bolt steel post was selected as the most promising design. The fracturing-bolt steel post successfully matched the strength and dynamic behavior of the CRT wood post in three impact orientations. The UBSP was incorporated into the Thrie beam bullnose barrier system and subjected to three full-scale vehicle crash tests according to the Test Level 3 guidelines provided in NCHRP Report 350. Test Designations 3–30, 3–31, and 3–38 were chosen to evaluate the performance of the Thrie beam bullnose system with UBSPs. All three full-scale crash tests demonstrated that the UBSP performed in a satisfactory manner in the bullnose system, as the vehicle was captured and safely brought to a controlled stop. On the basis of the successful completion of the three full-scale crash tests, it is recommended that the UBSP be considered a safe alternative to CRT posts in the original Thrie beam bullnose median barrier system. It is also noted that the performance of the UBSP suggests that it may have additional applications, including in long-span guardrail, end terminals, and guardrail in mow strips or encased in pavement.

Approach Guardrail Transition for Single-Slope Concrete Barriers

1996 ◽  
Vol 1528 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald K. Faller ◽  
Ketil Soyland ◽  
Dean L. Sicking
Keyword(s):  
Performance Evaluation ◽  
Full Scale ◽  
Safety Performance ◽  
Vehicle Crash ◽  
Concrete Barriers ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Crash Tests ◽  
Test Level

An approach guardrail transition for use with the single-slope concrete median barrier was developed and crash tested. The transition was constructed with 3.43-mm-thick (10-gauge) thrie-beam rail and was supported by nine W6 × 9 steel posts. Post spacings consisted of one at 292 mm (11.5 in.), five at 476 mm (1 ft 6.75 in.), and three at 952 mm (3 ft 1.5 in.). A structural tube spacer block (TS 7 × 4 × 3/16) was also developed for use with the thrie-beam rail. Two full-scale vehicle crash tests were performed, and the system was shown to meet the Test Level 3 requirements specified in NCHRP Report 350: Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Features.

Guardrail Connection for Low-Fill Culverts

2003 ◽  
Vol 1851 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karla A. Polivka ◽  
Ronald K. Faller ◽  
John R. Rohde
Keyword(s):  
Computer Simulation ◽  
Performance Evaluation ◽  
Simulation Modeling ◽  
Research Study ◽  
Dynamic Testing ◽  
Safety Performance ◽  
Rigid Foundation ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Crash Tests ◽  
Test Level

A W-beam guardrail system was developed for attachment to the top slab of a low-fill concrete culvert. The guardrail design was constructed with a single, 2.66-mm-thick W-beam rail totaling 53.34 m in length. Over the culvert, W150×13.5 steel posts 946 mm long spaced 952.5 mm on center supported the W-beam rail. The research study included dynamic testing with a bogie vehicle and steel posts attached to a rigid foundation, computer simulation modeling with BARRIER VII, and two full-scale vehicle crash tests. The crash tests used three-quarter-ton pickup trucks and were conducted in accordance with the Test Level 3 (TL-3) requirements specified in NCHRP Report 350: Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Features. The first test was successfully conducted on the guardrail system with the back sides of the posts positioned 457 mm away from the front of the culvert’s headwall. The second test was unsuccessfully performed on the guardrail system with the back sides of the posts positioned 25 mm away from the front of the headwall. The safety performance of the W-beam guardrail system attached to the top of a low-fill concrete culvert was determined to be acceptable according to the TL-3 criteria found in NCHRP Report 350. Recommendations for the final placement of the guardrail system with respect to the culvert headwall are also made.

Development of a 34-in. Tall Thrie-Beam Guardrail Transition to Accommodate Future Roadway Overlays

2019 ◽  
Vol 2673 (2) ◽  
pp. 489-501
Author(s):  
Scott K. Rosenbaugh ◽  
Ronald K. Faller ◽  
Jennifer D. Schmidt ◽  
Robert W. Bielenberg
Keyword(s):  
Full Scale ◽  
Safety Performance ◽  
Performance Criteria ◽  
Concrete Barriers ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Crash Tests ◽  
Test Level

Roadway resurfacing and overlay projects effectively reduce the height of roadside barriers placed adjacent to the roadway, which can negatively affect their crashworthiness. More recently, bridge rails and concrete barriers have been installed with slightly increased heights to account for future overlays. However, adjacent guardrails and approach transitions have not yet been modified to account for overlays. The objective of this project was to develop an increased-height approach guardrail transition (AGT) to be crashworthy both before and after roadway overlays of up to 3 in. The 34-in. tall, thrie-beam transition detailed here was designed such that the system would be at its nominal 31-in. height following a 3-in. roadway overlay. Additionally, the upstream end of the AGT incorporated a symmetric W-to-thrie transition segment that would be replaced by an asymmetric transition segment after an overlay to keep the W-beam guardrail upstream from the transition at its nominal 31-in. height. The 34-in. tall AGT was connected to a modified version of the standardized buttress to mitigate the risk of vehicle snag below the rail. The barrier system was evaluated through two full-scale crash tests in accordance with Test Level 3 (TL-3) of AASHTO’s Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH) and satisfied all safety performance criteria. Thus, the 34-in. tall AGT with modified transition buttress was determined to be crashworthy to MASH TL-3 standards. Finally, implementation guidance was provided for the 34-in. tall AGT and its crashworthy variations.

Crash Testing and Evaluation of Culvert-Mounted Midwest Guardrail System

2020 ◽  
Vol 2674 (7) ◽  
pp. 161-171
Author(s):  
Mojdeh Asadollahi Pajouh ◽  
Robert W. Bielenberg ◽  
Jennifer D. Schmidt-Rasmussen ◽  
Ronald K. Faller
Keyword(s):  
American Association ◽  
Water Drainage ◽  
Test Installation ◽  
State Highway ◽  
Crash Testing ◽  
Test Number ◽  
Box Culverts ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Crash Tests ◽  
Test Level

Concrete box culverts are usually installed under roadways to allow water drainage without affecting the motoring public. Culvert openings can represent a hazard on the roadside when they do not extend outside of the clear zone, and often require safety treatments in the form of roadside barriers. In this study, a modified design of Midwest Guardrail System (MGS) was evaluated for installation on a low-fill culvert with the strong-post attachment using through-bolts and epoxy anchorage through full-scale crash testing. The test installation consisted of MGS with a 31 in. top rail height, supported by W6 × 9 posts, spaced at 37½ in., attached to a low-fill culvert’s top slab with a 12 in. offset from the back of the post to the culvert headwall. Two crash tests were conducted according to the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials’ (AASHTO) Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH) 2016 Test Level 3 impact safety criteria. In test number CMGS-1, a 2,428-lb car impacted the MGS attached to the culvert at a speed of 61.3 mph and at an angle of 25.1°. In test number CMGS-2, a 5,013-lb pickup truck impacted the MGS attached to the culvert at a speed of 62.8 mph and an angle of 25.7°. In both tests, the vehicle was safely redirected and captured. Both tests were deemed acceptable according to TL-3 safety criteria in MASH. Recommendations were made for the safe installation of MGS atop low-fill culverts as well as transitions from the standard MGS to the culvert-mounted MGS.

scholarly journals Development of a Test Level 3 Transition Between Guardrail and Portable Concrete Barriers

2017 ◽  
Vol 2638 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert W. Bielenberg ◽  
David Gutierrez ◽  
Ronald K. Faller ◽  
John D. Reid ◽  
Phil Tenhulzen
Keyword(s):  
Systems Design ◽  
Road Construction ◽  
Full Scale ◽  
Performance Criteria ◽  
Work Zones ◽  
Design Concepts ◽  
Crash Testing ◽  
Concrete Barriers ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Test Level

Road construction often requires that work zones be created and shielded by portable concrete barriers (PCBs) to protect workers and equipment from errant vehicles as well as to prevent motorists from striking other roadside hazards. For an existing W-beam guardrail system installed adjacent to the roadway and near the work zone, guardrail sections are removed so a PCB system can be placed. A study was done to develop a crashworthy transition between W-beam guardrail and PCB systems. Design concepts were developed and refined through computer simulation with LS-DYNA. Additionally, a study of critical impact points was conducted to determine impact locations for full-scale crash testing. The design effort resulted in a new system consisting of a Midwest Guardrail System that overlapped a series of F-shape PCB segments placed at a 15:1 flare. In the overlapped region of the barrier systems, uniquely designed blockout supports and a specialized W-beam end shoe mounting bracket were used to connect the systems. Three full-scale vehicle crash tests were successfully conducted according to the Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware Test Level 3 safety performance criteria. Because of the successful test results, a Test Level 3 crashworthy guardrail-to-PCB transition system is now available for protecting motorists, workers, and equipment in work zones.

Development of Transition between Free-Standing and Reduced-Deflection Portable Concrete Barriers

2018 ◽  
Vol 2672 (39) ◽  
pp. 118-129
Author(s):  
Mojdeh Asadollahi Pajouh ◽  
Robert W. Bielenberg ◽  
John D. Reid ◽  
Jennifer D. Schmidt ◽  
Ronald K. Faller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Steel Tube ◽  
Full Scale ◽  
Performance Criteria ◽  
Design System ◽  
Work Zones ◽  
Free Standing ◽  
Crash Testing ◽  
Deflection System ◽  
Concrete Barriers ◽  
Crash Tests

Portable concrete barriers (PCBs) are often used in applications in which limited deflection is desired during vehicle impacts, such as bridge decks and work zones. In an earlier study, a reduced-deflection, stiffening system was configured for use with non-anchored, F-shape PCBs and was successfully crash tested under Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH) safety performance criteria. However, details and guidance for implementing this barrier system outside the length-of-need, including within transitions to other barrier systems, were not provided. The focus of this study was to develop a crashworthy transition design between the reduced-deflection, F-shape PCB system to free-standing, F-shape PCB segments using engineering analysis and LS-DYNA computer simulation. First, the continuous steel tubes in the reduced-deflection system were tapered down to the surface of the free-standing PCB segments to reduce the potential for vehicle snag. In addition, steel tube spacers were added at the base of the two joints upstream from the reduced-deflection system to increase the stiffness of adjacent free-standing PCBs. Simulations were performed to determine the critical impact points for use in a full-scale crash testing program. It was recommended that three full-scale crash tests be conducted, two tests with a 2270P pickup truck vehicle and one test with an 1100C passenger car, to evaluate the proposed design system with impacts at the recommended critical impact points.

Enhanced MASH TL-3 Short-Radius System: Promising Design to Accommodate Flat Terrain and Ditches

2018 ◽  
Vol 2672 (39) ◽  
pp. 155-165
Author(s):  
Akram Y. Abu-Odeh ◽  
Roger P. Bligh ◽  
Christopher Lindsey ◽  
Wade Odell
Keyword(s):  
Impact Angle ◽  
Roadside Safety ◽  
Flat Terrain ◽  
Crash Testing ◽  
Geometrical Constraints ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Curved Section ◽  
National Cooperative ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Crash Tests

A challenging guardrail installation situation presents itself when two roadways intersect. Combining the guardrails from intersecting roadway results in what is commonly known as a short radius or T-intersection. It is difficult if not physically impossible to provide the required tensile capacity to the geometrical constraints of the curved section. Researchers and practitioners in the roadside safety area have been investigating the short-radius issue for many years. Investigators conducted numerous crash tests for different short-radius guardrail designs, yet none of those designs passed the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 350 Test Level 3 (TL-3) criteria. In 2009, the crash testing guidelines were updated in the Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH). MASH guidelines increased the impact severity for TL-3 tests over those in NCHRP 350. This paper presents a MASH TL-3 short-radius design that was successfully crash tested for both a flat terrain and a 3H:1V sloped terrain behind the installation. The impact conditions adopted from the MASH terminal/crash cushion matrix were MASH 3-33, 3-32, 3-31, and 3-35 for the flat terrain. Additionally, a slightly modified design that was installed in front of a 3H:1V slope was successfully evaluated using MASH 3-33 and 3-32 test conditions. These tests used a 25° impact angle since it was shown to be more critical for installation during simulation of the system.

Investigation and MASH Full-Scale Crash Testing of the Buried-in-Backslope Terminal Compatible with Midwest Guardrail System

2021 ◽  
pp. 036119812110332
Author(s):  
Chiara Silvestri Dobrovolny ◽  
Roger Bligh ◽  
Maysam Kiani ◽  
Jeff Jeffers
Keyword(s):  
Research Program ◽  
Full Scale ◽  
Terminal System ◽  
Crash Testing ◽  
Terminal Design ◽  
National Cooperative ◽  
Crash Tests ◽  
Highway Research

Buried-in-backslope (BIB) terminal designs for beam guardrails were developed under the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 350 criteria for 27¾-in. high guardrail systems. The design terminates a W-beam guardrail installation by burying the end terminal in the backslope. When properly designed and located, this type of anchor eliminates the possibility of an end-on impact with the barrier terminal and minimizes the likelihood of vehicular intrusion behind the barrier. Considering the increase in guardrail height to 31 in. in recent years, there is a need to modify the BIB terminal design for a 27¾-in. high guardrail to satisfy current crashworthiness standard criteria for a 31-in. high guardrail. The crash tests reported in this paper were performed in accordance with the Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH) Tests 3-34 and 3-35 for non-gating terminals, which represent the tests considered necessary to demonstrate MASH compliance of the device. The TL-3 BIB terminal system met MASH requirements and is considered MASH compliant. It is considered suitable for implementation at V-ditch locations with a 4H:1V or flatter foreslope where a MASH TL-3 BIB terminal system is needed and/or desired.

NCHRP Report 350 Testing of W-Beam Slotted-Rail Terminal

1997 ◽  
Vol 1599 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
King K. Mak ◽  
Hayes E. Ross ◽  
Roger P. Bligh ◽  
Wanda L. Menges
Keyword(s):  
High Speed ◽  
Safety Performance ◽  
The Other ◽  
Federal Aid ◽  
Speed Limits ◽  
Crash Testing ◽  
National Highway ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Test Level ◽  
Highway System

Two slotted-rail terminal (SRT) designs, one for use on roadways with speed limits of 72.4 km/hr (45 mi/hr) or less and the other for high-speed facilities, were previously developed and successfully crash-tested in accordance with guidelines set forth in NCHRP Report 230. Those SRT designs have been approved by FHWA for use on federal-aid projects. However, FHWA has since adopted NCHRP Report 350 as the official guidelines for safety performance evaluation of roadside features and required that all roadside features to be used on the National Highway System be crash-tested in accordance with the NCHRP Report 350 guidelines by 1998. It is therefore necessary to modify and retest the SRT designs in accordance with NCHRP Report 350 guidelines. The modified SRT design has successfully met the guidelines set forth in NCHRP Report 350 for Test Level 3 conditions, that is, 100-km/hr (62.2 mi/hr) and the results of the crash testing. The modified SRT design has been approved by FHWA for use on the national highway system.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document