scholarly journals Development of a Test Level 3 Transition Between Guardrail and Portable Concrete Barriers

2017 ◽  
Vol 2638 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert W. Bielenberg ◽  
David Gutierrez ◽  
Ronald K. Faller ◽  
John D. Reid ◽  
Phil Tenhulzen
Keyword(s):  
Systems Design ◽  
Road Construction ◽  
Full Scale ◽  
Performance Criteria ◽  
Work Zones ◽  
Design Concepts ◽  
Crash Testing ◽  
Concrete Barriers ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Test Level

Road construction often requires that work zones be created and shielded by portable concrete barriers (PCBs) to protect workers and equipment from errant vehicles as well as to prevent motorists from striking other roadside hazards. For an existing W-beam guardrail system installed adjacent to the roadway and near the work zone, guardrail sections are removed so a PCB system can be placed. A study was done to develop a crashworthy transition between W-beam guardrail and PCB systems. Design concepts were developed and refined through computer simulation with LS-DYNA. Additionally, a study of critical impact points was conducted to determine impact locations for full-scale crash testing. The design effort resulted in a new system consisting of a Midwest Guardrail System that overlapped a series of F-shape PCB segments placed at a 15:1 flare. In the overlapped region of the barrier systems, uniquely designed blockout supports and a specialized W-beam end shoe mounting bracket were used to connect the systems. Three full-scale vehicle crash tests were successfully conducted according to the Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware Test Level 3 safety performance criteria. Because of the successful test results, a Test Level 3 crashworthy guardrail-to-PCB transition system is now available for protecting motorists, workers, and equipment in work zones.

Development of a 34-in. Tall Thrie-Beam Guardrail Transition to Accommodate Future Roadway Overlays

2019 ◽  
Vol 2673 (2) ◽  
pp. 489-501
Author(s):  
Scott K. Rosenbaugh ◽  
Ronald K. Faller ◽  
Jennifer D. Schmidt ◽  
Robert W. Bielenberg
Keyword(s):  
Full Scale ◽  
Safety Performance ◽  
Performance Criteria ◽  
Concrete Barriers ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Crash Tests ◽  
Test Level

Roadway resurfacing and overlay projects effectively reduce the height of roadside barriers placed adjacent to the roadway, which can negatively affect their crashworthiness. More recently, bridge rails and concrete barriers have been installed with slightly increased heights to account for future overlays. However, adjacent guardrails and approach transitions have not yet been modified to account for overlays. The objective of this project was to develop an increased-height approach guardrail transition (AGT) to be crashworthy both before and after roadway overlays of up to 3 in. The 34-in. tall, thrie-beam transition detailed here was designed such that the system would be at its nominal 31-in. height following a 3-in. roadway overlay. Additionally, the upstream end of the AGT incorporated a symmetric W-to-thrie transition segment that would be replaced by an asymmetric transition segment after an overlay to keep the W-beam guardrail upstream from the transition at its nominal 31-in. height. The 34-in. tall AGT was connected to a modified version of the standardized buttress to mitigate the risk of vehicle snag below the rail. The barrier system was evaluated through two full-scale crash tests in accordance with Test Level 3 (TL-3) of AASHTO’s Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH) and satisfied all safety performance criteria. Thus, the 34-in. tall AGT with modified transition buttress was determined to be crashworthy to MASH TL-3 standards. Finally, implementation guidance was provided for the 34-in. tall AGT and its crashworthy variations.

Development of Transition between Free-Standing and Reduced-Deflection Portable Concrete Barriers

2018 ◽  
Vol 2672 (39) ◽  
pp. 118-129
Author(s):  
Mojdeh Asadollahi Pajouh ◽  
Robert W. Bielenberg ◽  
John D. Reid ◽  
Jennifer D. Schmidt ◽  
Ronald K. Faller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Steel Tube ◽  
Full Scale ◽  
Performance Criteria ◽  
Design System ◽  
Work Zones ◽  
Free Standing ◽  
Crash Testing ◽  
Deflection System ◽  
Concrete Barriers ◽  
Crash Tests

Portable concrete barriers (PCBs) are often used in applications in which limited deflection is desired during vehicle impacts, such as bridge decks and work zones. In an earlier study, a reduced-deflection, stiffening system was configured for use with non-anchored, F-shape PCBs and was successfully crash tested under Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH) safety performance criteria. However, details and guidance for implementing this barrier system outside the length-of-need, including within transitions to other barrier systems, were not provided. The focus of this study was to develop a crashworthy transition design between the reduced-deflection, F-shape PCB system to free-standing, F-shape PCB segments using engineering analysis and LS-DYNA computer simulation. First, the continuous steel tubes in the reduced-deflection system were tapered down to the surface of the free-standing PCB segments to reduce the potential for vehicle snag. In addition, steel tube spacers were added at the base of the two joints upstream from the reduced-deflection system to increase the stiffness of adjacent free-standing PCBs. Simulations were performed to determine the critical impact points for use in a full-scale crash testing program. It was recommended that three full-scale crash tests be conducted, two tests with a 2270P pickup truck vehicle and one test with an 1100C passenger car, to evaluate the proposed design system with impacts at the recommended critical impact points.

Approach Guardrail Transition for Single-Slope Concrete Barriers

1996 ◽  
Vol 1528 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald K. Faller ◽  
Ketil Soyland ◽  
Dean L. Sicking
Keyword(s):  
Performance Evaluation ◽  
Full Scale ◽  
Safety Performance ◽  
Vehicle Crash ◽  
Concrete Barriers ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Crash Tests ◽  
Test Level

An approach guardrail transition for use with the single-slope concrete median barrier was developed and crash tested. The transition was constructed with 3.43-mm-thick (10-gauge) thrie-beam rail and was supported by nine W6 × 9 steel posts. Post spacings consisted of one at 292 mm (11.5 in.), five at 476 mm (1 ft 6.75 in.), and three at 952 mm (3 ft 1.5 in.). A structural tube spacer block (TS 7 × 4 × 3/16) was also developed for use with the thrie-beam rail. Two full-scale vehicle crash tests were performed, and the system was shown to meet the Test Level 3 requirements specified in NCHRP Report 350: Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Features.

Long-Span Guardrail System for Culvert Applications

2000 ◽  
Vol 1720 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald K. Faller ◽  
Dean L. Sicking ◽  
Karla A. Polivka ◽  
John R. Rohde ◽  
Bob W. Bielenberg
Keyword(s):  
Simulation Modeling ◽  
Research Study ◽  
Full Scale ◽  
Wood Block ◽  
Long Span ◽  
Crash Testing ◽  
Vehicle Crash ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Crash Tests ◽  
Test Level

A long-span guardrail for use over low-fill culverts was developed and successfully crash tested. The guardrail system was configured with 30.48 m of nested, 12-gauge W-beam rail and centered around a 7.62-m-long unsupported span. The nested W-beam rail was supported by 16 W152×13.4 steel posts and 6 standard CRT posts, each with two 150-mm×200×360 mm wood block-outs. Each post was 1830 mm long. Post spacings were 1905 mm on center, except for the 7.62-m spacing between the two CRT posts surrounding the long span. The research study included computer simulation modeling with Barrier VII and full-scale vehicle crash testing, using 3/4-ton (680-kg) pickup trucks in accordance with the Test Level 3 (TL-3) requirements specified in NCHRP Report 350. Three full-scale vehicle crash tests were performed. The first test was unsuccessful because of severe vehicle penetration into the guardrail system. This penetration resulted from a loss of rail tensile capacity during vehicle redirection when the swagged fitting on the cable anchor assembly failed. A second test was performed on the same design, which contained a new cable anchor assembly. During vehicle redirection, the pickup truck rolled over and the test was considered a failure. The long-span system was subsequently redesigned to incorporate double block-outs on the CRT posts and crash tested again. Following the successful third test, the long-span guardrail system was determined to meet TL-3 criteria.

Development of Universal Breakaway Steel Post for Bullnose Median Barrier

2012 ◽  
Vol 2309 (1) ◽  
pp. 94-104
Author(s):  
Robert W. Bielenberg ◽  
Karla A. Lechtenberg ◽  
Dean L. Sicking ◽  
Steve Arens ◽  
Ronald K. Faller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Release ◽  
Full Scale ◽  
Successful Completion ◽  
Safe Alternative ◽  
Long Span ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Crash Tests ◽  
Test Level ◽  
Bolt Steel ◽  
Satisfactory Manner

A new fracturing-bolt universal breakaway steel post (UBSP) was developed and evaluated for use as a replacement for the controlled-release terminal (CRT) wood post currently used in the Thrie beam bullnose system. After numerous steel post concepts were investigated, a fracturing-bolt steel post was selected as the most promising design. The fracturing-bolt steel post successfully matched the strength and dynamic behavior of the CRT wood post in three impact orientations. The UBSP was incorporated into the Thrie beam bullnose barrier system and subjected to three full-scale vehicle crash tests according to the Test Level 3 guidelines provided in NCHRP Report 350. Test Designations 3–30, 3–31, and 3–38 were chosen to evaluate the performance of the Thrie beam bullnose system with UBSPs. All three full-scale crash tests demonstrated that the UBSP performed in a satisfactory manner in the bullnose system, as the vehicle was captured and safely brought to a controlled stop. On the basis of the successful completion of the three full-scale crash tests, it is recommended that the UBSP be considered a safe alternative to CRT posts in the original Thrie beam bullnose median barrier system. It is also noted that the performance of the UBSP suggests that it may have additional applications, including in long-span guardrail, end terminals, and guardrail in mow strips or encased in pavement.

Crash Testing and Evaluation of Culvert-Mounted Midwest Guardrail System

2020 ◽  
Vol 2674 (7) ◽  
pp. 161-171
Author(s):  
Mojdeh Asadollahi Pajouh ◽  
Robert W. Bielenberg ◽  
Jennifer D. Schmidt-Rasmussen ◽  
Ronald K. Faller
Keyword(s):  
American Association ◽  
Water Drainage ◽  
Test Installation ◽  
State Highway ◽  
Crash Testing ◽  
Test Number ◽  
Box Culverts ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Crash Tests ◽  
Test Level

Concrete box culverts are usually installed under roadways to allow water drainage without affecting the motoring public. Culvert openings can represent a hazard on the roadside when they do not extend outside of the clear zone, and often require safety treatments in the form of roadside barriers. In this study, a modified design of Midwest Guardrail System (MGS) was evaluated for installation on a low-fill culvert with the strong-post attachment using through-bolts and epoxy anchorage through full-scale crash testing. The test installation consisted of MGS with a 31 in. top rail height, supported by W6 × 9 posts, spaced at 37½ in., attached to a low-fill culvert’s top slab with a 12 in. offset from the back of the post to the culvert headwall. Two crash tests were conducted according to the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials’ (AASHTO) Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH) 2016 Test Level 3 impact safety criteria. In test number CMGS-1, a 2,428-lb car impacted the MGS attached to the culvert at a speed of 61.3 mph and at an angle of 25.1°. In test number CMGS-2, a 5,013-lb pickup truck impacted the MGS attached to the culvert at a speed of 62.8 mph and an angle of 25.7°. In both tests, the vehicle was safely redirected and captured. Both tests were deemed acceptable according to TL-3 safety criteria in MASH. Recommendations were made for the safe installation of MGS atop low-fill culverts as well as transitions from the standard MGS to the culvert-mounted MGS.

Interaction Between Single Unit Trucks and Concrete Barriers in High Speed Impacts

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
John D. Reid ◽  
Ronald K. Faller
Keyword(s):  
Single Unit ◽  
High Speed ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Full Scale ◽  
Single Units ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Crash Testing ◽  
Concrete Barriers ◽  
Recommended Practices

Single Units Trucks (SUT’s) are commonly used for hauling many things and typically have a loaded mass between 8,000 to 10,000 kg (18,000 and 23,000 lbs). Concrete barriers are commonly used on high volume traffic highways that have very little median space between opposing traffic lanes. The interaction between SUT’s and concrete barriers during impacts at speeds between 80–90 km/h (50–56 mph) at angles up to 15 degrees is of importance not only to the driver, but also to the surrounding traffic. Of particular concern is the vehicle rolling-over the barrier. This study investigates some recent full-scale crash testing and simulation of SUT’s into concrete barriers. Information gained from this study is being used to help determine the next generation of recommended practices and procedures for designing and testing concrete barriers, as well as other types of barriers, like bridge-rails.

NCHRP Report 350 Testing of W-Beam Slotted-Rail Terminal

1997 ◽  
Vol 1599 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
King K. Mak ◽  
Hayes E. Ross ◽  
Roger P. Bligh ◽  
Wanda L. Menges
Keyword(s):  
High Speed ◽  
Safety Performance ◽  
The Other ◽  
Federal Aid ◽  
Speed Limits ◽  
Crash Testing ◽  
National Highway ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Test Level ◽  
Highway System

Two slotted-rail terminal (SRT) designs, one for use on roadways with speed limits of 72.4 km/hr (45 mi/hr) or less and the other for high-speed facilities, were previously developed and successfully crash-tested in accordance with guidelines set forth in NCHRP Report 230. Those SRT designs have been approved by FHWA for use on federal-aid projects. However, FHWA has since adopted NCHRP Report 350 as the official guidelines for safety performance evaluation of roadside features and required that all roadside features to be used on the National Highway System be crash-tested in accordance with the NCHRP Report 350 guidelines by 1998. It is therefore necessary to modify and retest the SRT designs in accordance with NCHRP Report 350 guidelines. The modified SRT design has successfully met the guidelines set forth in NCHRP Report 350 for Test Level 3 conditions, that is, 100-km/hr (62.2 mi/hr) and the results of the crash testing. The modified SRT design has been approved by FHWA for use on the national highway system.

Minimum Effective Length for the Midwest Guardrail System

2015 ◽  
Vol 2521 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer D. Schmidt ◽  
John D. Reid ◽  
Nicholas A. Weiland ◽  
Ronald K. Faller
Keyword(s):  
System Performance ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Full Scale ◽  
Effective Length ◽  
Crash Test ◽  
Minimum Length ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Crash Testing ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
System Length

The recommended minimum length for the standard Midwest Guardrail System (MGS) is 175 ft (55.3 m) based on crash testing according to NCHRP Report 350 and AASHTO's Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH) specifications. However, varying roadside hazards and roadway geometries may require a W-beam guardrail system to be shorter than the currently tested minimum length. The effects of reducing system length for the MGS were therefore investigated. The research study included one full-scale crash test with a Dodge Ram pickup truck striking a 75-ft (22.9-m) long MGS system. The barrier system satisfied all MASH Test Level 3 (TL-3) evaluation criteria for Test Designation Number 3-11. Test results confirmed that the reduced system length did not adversely affect overall system performance or deflections. Simulations that used BARRIER VII and LS-DYNA were also conducted to analyze system performance with reduced lengths of 50 ft (15.2 m) and 62 ft 6 in. (19.1 m). Both system lengths exhibited the potential for successfully redirecting an errant vehicle at MASH TL-3 test conditions. However, these reduced-length systems would have a narrow window for redirecting vehicles and would be able to shield hazards of only a limited size. Owing to limitations associated with the computer simulations, full-scale crash testing is recommended before these shorter systems are installed.

Retrofit Bridge Rail Design and Testing for a Historic Texas Steel Truss Bridge

2013 ◽  
Vol 2377 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-37
Author(s):  
William Williams
Keyword(s):  
Analytical Procedure ◽  
Design Procedure ◽  
Steel Truss Bridge ◽  
Crash Testing ◽  
Steel Truss ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Truss Bridge ◽  
Design And Testing ◽  
Test Level ◽  
Level 2

The State Loop 481 steel truss bridge over the Llano River in Junction, Texas, is classified as a historic structure. The bridge is approximately 1,423 ft long and has a railing that attaches directly to the steel truss members and does not meet the current AASHTO Test Level 2 (TL-2) strength requirements. Many supporting truss members were not adequate to resist TL-2 crash force. The purpose of this research was to design a crashworthy retrofit bridge rail that met the current AASHTO TL-2 strength requirements without overstressing the supporting truss members. The new design maintains the historic appearance of the structure. This paper presents details of the new bridge rail design and an analytical procedure for determining the magnitude of force transmitted to the supporting truss members. Crushable-pipe blockouts located between the new retrofit rail design and the truss members were developed as part of this research and were used to minimize the crash force transmitted to the steel truss members. The new bridge rail design was successfully crash tested in accordance with the TL-2 requirements of NCHRP Report 350. A bridge rail expansion splice was developed for the new bridge rail design and was successfully crash tested in accordance with the Test Level 3 requirements of NCHRP Report 350. This paper presents the results of this research, details of the expansion splice, the new bridge rail design, the design procedure, and the results of the crash testing.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document