scholarly journals Enucleation After Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Patients With Uveal Melanoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-51
Author(s):  
Pavlína Zahorjanová ◽  
Ján Sekáč ◽  
Pavel Babál ◽  
Michal Štubňa
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Progression ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Uveal Melanoma ◽  
Linear Accelerator ◽  
Slovak Republic ◽  
Neovascular Glaucoma ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Histopathological Findings ◽  
Randomised Study ◽  
Time Period

Introduction: In the past enucleation was the treatment of choice for all the patients with uveal melanoma. Nowadays, we prefer glope-sparing treatment modalities, except for large tumors, tumors with extrascleral extension and painful blind eyes. Most of the patients perform radiotherapy or local resection techniques. In Slovak Republic, the only one possibility is a stereotactic radiotherapy on a linear accelerator LINAC. Nevertheless, enucleation after radiotherapy is necessary for some patients. The causes are postradiation complications, mainly neovascular glaucoma, tumor recurrence, tumor progression or patient´s decision. Material and methods: The retrospective non-randomised study of 168 eyes of the patients with choroidal or ciliary body melanoma, who performed one-day session stereotactic radiosurgery at the linear accelerator LINAC during period 2007-2016. The data about postradiation complications were analysed based on the medical records of the patients and the data about enucleated eyes based on the histopathological findings. Results: The occurence of enucleation after radiotherapy in our cohort was 17 % (28 patients), with median time period after radiotherapy 21,5 months. The most common cause was neovascular glaucoma (82 %), then tumor progression (14 %) and patient´s decision (4 %). The most common histopathological finding was spindle-cell melanoma. Discussion: Others authors describe similar enucleation rate and causes. The histopathological findings indentified more viable melanoma cells in eyes enucleated for tumor progression in comparison with enucleation for other causes. Enucleation may be more difficult and the occurence of postoperative complications can be higher in the eyes after radiotherapy rather than primary enucleation. Conclusion: The management of the patients with uveal melanoma is difficult, and requires the cooperation of ophthalmologist, oncologist, radiation physicist and pathologist. Even if we make effort to preserve the eye, enucleation after radiotherapy is necessary in some patients.

scholarly journals Secondary glaucoma in small versus large uveal melanoma patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery on linear accelerator

2019 ◽  
Vol 120 (12) ◽  
pp. 945-949
Author(s):  
J. Sekac ◽  
S. L. Ferkova ◽  
A. Kollarova ◽  
P. Kusenda ◽  
R. Furda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Uveal Melanoma ◽  
Linear Accelerator ◽  
Secondary Glaucoma ◽  
Melanoma Patients

scholarly journals RTHP-12. NATIONWIDE DISTRIBUTION OF LINEAR ACCELERATOR VERSUS GAMMA KNIFE STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY UTILIZATION FOR METASTATIC BRAIN DISEASE IN ACADEMIC VERSUS COMMUNITY HOSPITALS

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi212-vi212
Author(s):  
Shearwood McClelland III ◽  
Catherine Degnin ◽  
Yiyi Chen ◽  
Gordon Watson ◽  
Jerry Jaboin
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Gamma Knife ◽  
Linear Accelerator ◽  
The United States ◽  
Brain Disease ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Academic Hospital ◽  
Cancer Data ◽  
Academic Hospitals

Abstract INTRODUCTION Single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is often the preferred treatment modality for metastatic brain disease, particularly when patients have a small enough volume of disease to preclude whole brain radiation therapy and its associated permanent cognitive morbidity. The two predominant SRS treatment modalities are Gamma Knife and linear accelerator (LINAC). The recent impact of SRS modality in academic versus community hospital settings in the United States (US) since the 2013 implementation of the American Tax Payer Relief Act (ATRA) has yet to be examined. METHODS Brain metastases patients from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) throughout the United States having undergone SRS were identified using the 2010–2016 National Cancer Data Base (NCDB). SRS utilization in academic versus community (non-academic) hospitals was identified and assessed. RESULTS Of the 4,012 SRS patients examined, the majority (64%) were treated at academic hospitals. Beginning in 2014, LINAC SRS rapidly increased in popularity compared to GKRS, reversing an annual decline in utilization originating from 2011. The 63% LINAC composition of SRS cases at non-academic centers in 2016 was an all-time high, a 12% increase from a year earlier. This was markedly different than SRS utilization at academic hospitals, where despite a steady increase in LINAC SRS since 2013, GKRS remained the predominant SRS modality, comprising 73% of cases in 2016. CONCLUSIONS The implementation of LINAC over Gamma Knife SRS in the non-academic hospital setting has markedly increased in the timespan since ATRA implementation, comprising more than 60% of SRS cases compared to only 27% of academic hospital SRS cases in 2016. These findings indicate that without the substantially increased Medicare reimbursement advantage formerly associated with Gamma Knife compared to LINAC prior to ATRA, the non-academic setting may be more sensitive than academic centers to conditions optimizing reimbursement.

Functional stereotactic radiosurgery involving a dedicated linear accelerator and gamma unit: a comparison study

2004 ◽  
pp. 373-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy D. Solberg ◽  
Steven J. Goetsch ◽  
Michael T. Selch ◽  
William Melega ◽  
Goran Lacan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Linear Accelerator ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Single Shot ◽  
Submillimeter Range ◽  
Primate Model ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Stereotactic Frame ◽  
Targeting Ability ◽  
Fine Print

Object. The purpose of this work was to investigate the targeting and dosimetric characteristics of a linear accelerator (LINAC) system dedicated for stereotactic radiosurgery compared with those of a commercial gamma knife (GK) unit. Methods. A phantom was rigidly affixed within a Leksell stereotactic frame and axial computerized tomography scans were obtained using an appropriate stereotactic localization device. Treatment plans were performed, film was inserted into a recessed area, and the phantom was positioned and treated according to each treatment plan. In the case of the LINAC system, four 140° arcs, spanning ± 60° of couch rotation, were used. In the case of the GK unit, all 201 sources were left unplugged. Radiation was delivered using 3- and 8-mm LINAC collimators and 4- and 8-mm collimators of the GK unit. Targeting ability was investigated independently on the dedicated LINAC by using a primate model. Measured 50% spot widths for multisource, single-shot radiation exceeded nominal values in all cases by 38 to 70% for the GK unit and 11 to 33% for the LINAC system. Measured offsets were indicative of submillimeter targeting precision on both devices. In primate studies, the appearance of an magnetic resonance imaging—enhancing lesion coincided with the intended target. Conclusions. Radiosurgery performed using the 3-mm collimator of the dedicated LINAC exhibited characteristics that compared favorably with those of a dedicated GK unit. Overall targeting accuracy in the submillimeter range can be achieved, and dose distributions with sharp falloff can be expected for both devices.

scholarly journals Cyberknife® hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (CK-hSRS) as salvage treatment for brain metastases

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergej Telentschak ◽  
Daniel Ruess ◽  
Stefan Grau ◽  
Roland Goldbrunner ◽  
Niklas von Spreckelsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Salvage Treatment ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Large Tumor ◽  
Fractionated Radiotherapy ◽  
Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiosurgery

Abstract Purpose The introduction of hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (hSRS) extended the treatment modalities beyond the well-established single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery and fractionated radiotherapy. Here, we report the efficacy and side effects of hSRS using Cyberknife® (CK-hSRS) for the treatment of patients with critical brain metastases (BM) and a very poor prognosis. We discuss our experience in light of current literature. Methods All patients who underwent CK-hSRS over 3 years were retrospectively included. We applied a surface dose of 27 Gy in 3 fractions. Rates of local control (LC), systemic progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan–Meier method. Treatment-related complications were rated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Results We analyzed 34 patients with 75 BM. 53% of the patients had a large tumor, tumor location was eloquent in 32%, and deep seated in 15%. 36% of tumors were recurrent after previous irradiation. The median Karnofsky Performance Status was 65%. The actuarial rates of LC at 3, 6, and 12 months were 98%, 98%, and 78.6%, respectively. Three, 6, and 12 months PFS was 38%, 32%, and 15%, and OS was 65%, 47%, and 28%, respectively. Median OS was significantly associated with higher KPS, which was the only significant factor for survival. Complications CTCAE grade 1–3 were observed in 12%. Conclusion Our radiation schedule showed a reasonable treatment effectiveness and tolerance. Representing an optimal salvage treatment for critical BM in patients with a very poor prognosis and clinical performance state, CK-hSRS may close the gap between surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery, conventional radiotherapy, and palliative care.

Management of choroidal melanomas with linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiosurgery

1999 ◽  
Vol 77 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Wan Leung ◽  
Ching-Yeh Hsiung ◽  
Hui-Chun Chen ◽  
Han-Jung Chen ◽  
Sue-Ann Lin
Keyword(s):  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Linear Accelerator ◽  
Choroidal Melanomas

One-Day Session LINAC–Based Stereotactic Radiosurgery of Posterior Uveal Melanoma

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 226-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alena Furdova ◽  
Peter Strmen ◽  
Iveta Waczulikova ◽  
Martin Chorvath ◽  
Miron Sramka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Uveal Melanoma

Histopathological findings of X-linked retinoschisis with neovascular glaucoma

2000 ◽  
Vol 238 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Ando ◽  
K. Takahashi ◽  
K. Sho ◽  
M. Matsushima ◽  
A. Okamura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neovascular Glaucoma ◽  
Histopathological Findings

Preliminary results of linear accelerator radiosurgery for acoustic schwannomas

1996 ◽  
Vol 85 (6) ◽  
pp. 1013-1019 ◽  
Author(s):  
William M. Mendenhall ◽  
William A. Friedman ◽  
John M. Buatti ◽  
Francis J. Bova
Keyword(s):  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Local Control ◽  
Linear Accelerator ◽  
Local Control Rate ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Images ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Treatment Volume ◽  
Fine Print

✓ In this paper the authors evaluate the results of linear accelerator (LINAC)—based stereotactic radiosurgery for acoustic schwannomas. Fifty-six patients underwent LINAC-based stereotactic radiosurgery for acoustic schwannomas at the University of Florida between July 1988 and November 1994. Each patient was followed for a minimum of 1 year or until death; no patient was lost to follow up. One or more follow-up magnetic resonance images or computerized tomography scans were obtained in 52 of the 56 patients. Doses ranged between 10 and 22.5 Gy with 69.6% of patients receiving 12.5 to 15 Gy. Thirty-eight patients (68%) were treated with one isocenter and the dose was specified to the 80% isodose line in 71% of patients. Fifty-five patients (98%) achieved local control after treatment. The 5-year actuarial local control rate was 95%. At the time of analysis, 48 patients were alive and free of disease, seven had died of intercurrent disease, and one was alive with disease. Complications developed in 13 patients (23%). The likelihood of complications was related to the dose and treatment volume: 10 to 12.5 Gy to all volumes, three (13%) of 23 patients; 15 to 17.5 Gy to 5.5 cm3 or less, two (9%) of 23 patients; 15 to 17.5 Gy to more than 5.5 cm3, five (71%) of seven patients; and 20 to 22.5 Gy to all volumes, three (100%) of three patients. Linear accelerator—based stereotactic radiosurgery results in a high rate of local control at 5 years. The risk of complications is related to the dose and treatment volume.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document