Clinical Evaluation of Ceramic Inlays Compared to Composite Restorations

10.2341/08-95 ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 263-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. T. Lange ◽  
P. Pfeiffer
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Evaluation ◽  
Survival Probability ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Class I ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Ceramic Inlays ◽  
Significant Difference

Clinical Relevance Evopress ceramic inlays and Filtek Z250 composite restorations showed no significant difference regarding survival probability at 57 months when used as Class I and II restoratives in premolars and molars. Both materials demonstrated acceptable clinical performance, with a preference for the ceramic inlays.

Clinical Evaluation of Posterior Composite Restorations in Endodontically Treated Teeth

2006 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 17-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esra Can Say ◽  
Baybora Kayahan ◽  
Emre Ozel ◽  
Kagan Gokce ◽  
Mubin Soyman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Evaluation ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
United States Public Health ◽  
Endodontically Treated Teeth ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Paired Samples ◽  
Bonding System ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Usphs Criteria ◽  
Mandibular Teeth

Abstract Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate the two year clinical performance of posterior composite restorations in endodontically treated premolars and molars using a hybrid composite (Filtek Z-250, 3M ESPE) and a total etch bonding system (Single Bond, 3M ESPE). Method and Materials Thirty-nine class II restorations in endodontically treated premolars (n=11) and molars (n=28) of 27 patients (14 female, 13 male, mean age 36.51) in 16 maxillar and 23 mandibular teeth were placed by one operator. Restorations were evaluated by two experienced investigators at baseline, 12 months, and 24 months according to the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria that included retention, color match, marginal discoloration, secondary caries, anatomic form, marginal adaptation, and surface texture. All restorations were able to be evaluated at baseline, 12 months, and 24 months. Results Paired samples t-test showed only marginal discoloration showed a statistically significant difference (p<0.05) at the end of 24 months, and no other significant differences were observed for the other variables examined over the duration of the study. None of the restored teeth showed periapical pathology at the end of 24 months. Conclusion At two years, limited deterioration in marginal discoloration was detected. The clinical performance of posterior composite restorations in endodontically treated teeth using Filtek Z250 was found clinically acceptable after two years. Citation Can Say E, Kayahan B, Ozel E, Gokce K, Soyman M, Bayirli G. Clinical Evaluation of Posterior Composite Restorations in Endodontically Treated Teeth. J Contemp Dent Pract 2006 May;(7)2:017-025.

scholarly journals Clinical Evaluation of the Soft-Start (Pulse-delay) Polymerization Technique in Class I and II Composite Restorations

2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 265-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. C. N. Chan ◽  
W. D. Browning ◽  
K. B. Frazier ◽  
M. G. Brackett
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Evaluation ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Class I ◽  
Pulse Delay ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Soft Start

Clinical Relevance Class I and II composite restorations placed with a Soft-Start technique showed no significant changes in post-op sensitivity to cold or any decreased signs of marginal stress.

Six-year Clinical Evaluation of Packable Composite Restorations

10.2341/08-48 ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Kiremitci ◽  
T. Alpaslan ◽  
S. Gurgan
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Evaluation ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Composite Restorations

Clinical Relevance As a posterior composite, Filtek P60 exhibited very good clinical performance in Class II cavities for six years.

scholarly journals 2-year Clinical Evaluation of Sodium Hypochlorite Treatment in the Restoration of Non-carious Cervical Lesions: A Pilot Study

2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 530-535 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. P. A. Saboia ◽  
P. C. Almeida ◽  
A. V. Ritter ◽  
E. J. Swift ◽  
L. A. F. Pimenta
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Sodium Hypochlorite ◽  
Clinical Evaluation ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Acid Etching ◽  
Cervical Lesions ◽  
Composite Restorations

Clinical Relevance The use of 10% sodium hypochlorite to remove exposed collagen after acid-etching did not affect the clinical performance of composite restorations of non-carious cervical lesions.

Clinical Comparison of Bur- and Laser-prepared Minimally Invasive Occlusal Resin Composite Restorations: Two-year Follow-up

2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 500-507 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. R. Yazici ◽  
M. Baseren ◽  
J. Gorucu
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Promising Alternative ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Clinical Comparison ◽  
Prepared Composite

Clinical Relevance The laser could be a promising alternative for minimally invasive occlusal resin composite cavity preparations, as its clinical performance was similar to bur-prepared composite restorations.

Clinical Evaluation of Indirect Composite Restorations at Baseline and 36 Months After Placement

2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 156-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Dukic ◽  
O. L. Dukic ◽  
S. Milardovic ◽  
B. Delija
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Evaluation ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Good Choice ◽  
Hybrid Resin ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Clinical Difference ◽  
Indirect Composite

Clinical Relevance Indirect resin composite restorations represent a good choice for the therapy of severely damaged teeth. There is no clinical difference between Ormocer and nano-hybrid resin composite after 36 months.

In Vivo Chlorhexidine Stabilization of Hybrid Layers of an Acetone-based Dentin Adhesive

2009 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 379-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. G. Brackett ◽  
F. R. Tay ◽  
W. W. Brackett ◽  
A. Dib ◽  
F. A. Dipp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Class I ◽  
Chlorhexidine Digluconate ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Extensive Degradation ◽  
One Year ◽  
Hybrid Layers ◽  
Dentin Adhesive

Clinical Relevance Extensive degradation of dentin hybrid layers formed with an acetone-based dentin adhesive beneath Class I resin composite restorations was evident after one year unless the teeth received an application of 2% chlorhexidine digluconate after etching.

Clinical Evaluation of a Two-step Etch&Rinse and a Two-step Self-etch Adhesive System in Class II Restorations: Two-year Results

2009 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 656-663 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. B. Ermis ◽  
O. Kam ◽  
E. U. Celik ◽  
U. B. Temel
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Evaluation ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Self Etch

Clinical Relevance The two-step etch&rinse and the two-step self-etch adhesive systems tested in this study demonstrated similar clinical performance in Class II cavities after two years.

scholarly journals Effects of Total and Selective Bonding on Marginal Adaptation and Microleakage of Class I Resin Composite Restorations In Vitro

2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 629-635 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. R. Schmidlin ◽  
T. Huber ◽  
T. N. Göhring ◽  
T. Attin ◽  
A. Bindl
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Class I ◽  
Marginal Adaptation ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Composite Restorations

Clinical Relevance Within the limitations of the current study, the use of glass ionomer liners improves the margin quality of Class I resin composite restorations and reduces leakage.

Clinical Evaluation of Noncarious Cervical Lesions of Different Extensions Restored With Bulk-fill or Conventional Resin Composite: Preliminary Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. E11-E20
Author(s):  
AMO Correia ◽  
ALB Jurema ◽  
MR Andrade ◽  
ALS Borges ◽  
E Bresciani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Clinical Evaluation ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Resin Composites ◽  
Cervical Lesions ◽  
Intergroup Comparison ◽  
Significant Difference

SUMMARY Purpose: This randomized clinical trial evaluated the influence of the occlusogingival distance (OGD) of noncarious cervical lesions (NCCLs) on the clinical performance of a regular bulk-fill resin composite and a regular nanofilled resin composite. Methods and Materials: A total of 140 restorations were randomly placed in 77 participants by one operator. NCCLs were divided into four groups (n=35) according to OGD (1.5 mm±10% or 3 mm±10%) and resin composites (Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior [B] or Filtek Z350 XT [C]) used: 1.5 mm-B, 1.5 mm-C, 3 mm-B, and 3 mm-C. A two-step self-etch adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond) was applied following manufacturer instructions in all restorative procedures. Restorations were polished 1 week after placement. Clinical evaluation was performed at baseline (7 days), 6 months, and 1 year by two calibrated examiners, according to the modified US Public Health Service criteria evaluating fractures/retention, marginal staining, marginal adaptation, recurrence of caries, anatomic form, postoperative sensitivity, and surface texture. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used for intergroup comparison in each follow-up; the Friedman analysis of variance, followed by the least significant difference test (multiple comparisons) was used for intragroup comparison between baseline and follow-up times (α=0.05). Results: Two restorations were lost at 12 months (1 for 1.5 mm-B and 1 for 3 mm-B). The retention rates at 12 months were 100% for 1.5 mm-C, 97% for 1.5 mm-B, 100% for 3 mm-C; and 97% for 3 mm-B, with no statistical difference among the groups (p=0.570). At 12 months, a statistically significant difference was found among the follow-up times for the same group (1.5 mm-B, 1.5 mm-C, and 3 mm-B) regarding the marginal staining criterion; moreover, the 3 mm-C group showed a significant difference from 6 months. No significant difference was found for the other parameters. Conclusion: Both resin composites showed acceptable clinical performance, and the OGD of NCCLs did not influence the clinical performance of resin composite restorations after 12 months.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document