Six-year Clinical Evaluation of Packable Composite Restorations

10.2341/08-48 ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Kiremitci ◽  
T. Alpaslan ◽  
S. Gurgan
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Evaluation ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Composite Restorations

Clinical Relevance As a posterior composite, Filtek P60 exhibited very good clinical performance in Class II cavities for six years.

Clinical Evaluation of a Two-step Etch&Rinse and a Two-step Self-etch Adhesive System in Class II Restorations: Two-year Results

2009 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 656-663 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. B. Ermis ◽  
O. Kam ◽  
E. U. Celik ◽  
U. B. Temel
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Evaluation ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Self Etch

Clinical Relevance The two-step etch&rinse and the two-step self-etch adhesive systems tested in this study demonstrated similar clinical performance in Class II cavities after two years.

Clinical Evaluation of Ceramic Inlays Compared to Composite Restorations

10.2341/08-95 ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 263-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. T. Lange ◽  
P. Pfeiffer
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Evaluation ◽  
Survival Probability ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Class I ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Ceramic Inlays ◽  
Significant Difference

Clinical Relevance Evopress ceramic inlays and Filtek Z250 composite restorations showed no significant difference regarding survival probability at 57 months when used as Class I and II restoratives in premolars and molars. Both materials demonstrated acceptable clinical performance, with a preference for the ceramic inlays.

scholarly journals 2-year Clinical Evaluation of Sodium Hypochlorite Treatment in the Restoration of Non-carious Cervical Lesions: A Pilot Study

2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 530-535 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. P. A. Saboia ◽  
P. C. Almeida ◽  
A. V. Ritter ◽  
E. J. Swift ◽  
L. A. F. Pimenta
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Sodium Hypochlorite ◽  
Clinical Evaluation ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Acid Etching ◽  
Cervical Lesions ◽  
Composite Restorations

Clinical Relevance The use of 10% sodium hypochlorite to remove exposed collagen after acid-etching did not affect the clinical performance of composite restorations of non-carious cervical lesions.

scholarly journals Comparison of Proximal Contacts of Class II Resin Composite Restorations In Vitro

2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 688-693 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. A. C. Loomans ◽  
N. J. M. Opdam ◽  
F. J. M. Roeters ◽  
E. M. Bronkhorst ◽  
R. C. W. Burgersdijk
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Composite Restoration

Clinical Relevance When placing a Class II resin composite restoration, the use of sectional matrix systems and separation rings to obtain tight proximal contacts is recommended.

Gingival Microleakage of Class II Resin Composite Restorations with Fiber Inserts

10.2341/06-86 ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 298-305 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. El-Mowafy ◽  
W. El-Badrawy ◽  
A. Eltanty ◽  
K. Abbasi ◽  
N. Habib
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Fiber Inserts

Clinical Relevance Fiber inserts incorporated at the gingival floor of Class II composite restorations resulted in a significant reduction of microleakage scores as compared to restorations made without inserts. This may lead to a reduced incidence of recurrent caries.

Factors Associated with Microleakage in Class II Resin Composite Restorations

10.2341/06-16 ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Idriss ◽  
T. Abduljabbar ◽  
C. Habib ◽  
R. Omar
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Gap Size ◽  
Marginal Gap ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Placement Technique

Clinical Relevance Even though marginal gap size was not shown to be a direct predictor for the extent of microleakage in resin composite restorations, both material and placement technique appear to be important determinants in microleakage and, thus, probably in clinical outcomes.

A Study of Microleakage in Class II Composite Restorations Using Four Different Curing Techniques

10.2341/06-98 ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 336-340 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Gharizadeh ◽  
K. Moradi ◽  
M. H. Haghighizadeh
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Composite Restorations

Clinical Relevance For bonded direct Class II restorations, the use of transparent matrices or metal matrices combined with light conducting instruments, such as light tips, should be favored because marginal leakage is significantly lower when compared to using metal matrices alone.

The Influence of Matrix Type on the Proximal Contact in Class II Resin Composite Restorations

2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 454-462 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Kampouropoulos ◽  
C. Paximada ◽  
M. Loukidis ◽  
A. Kakaboura
Keyword(s):  
Contact Area ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Matrix Type ◽  
Composite Restorations

Clinical Relevance The types of matrices assessed, metal or transparent, circumferential or sectional, straight or pre-contoured, were not able to adequately reconstruct all the characteristics of the proximal contact area of an intact tooth in Class II resin composite restorations.

Clinical Comparison of Bur- and Laser-prepared Minimally Invasive Occlusal Resin Composite Restorations: Two-year Follow-up

2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 500-507 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. R. Yazici ◽  
M. Baseren ◽  
J. Gorucu
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Promising Alternative ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Clinical Comparison ◽  
Prepared Composite

Clinical Relevance The laser could be a promising alternative for minimally invasive occlusal resin composite cavity preparations, as its clinical performance was similar to bur-prepared composite restorations.

Clinical Evaluation of Indirect Composite Restorations at Baseline and 36 Months After Placement

2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 156-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Dukic ◽  
O. L. Dukic ◽  
S. Milardovic ◽  
B. Delija
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Evaluation ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Good Choice ◽  
Hybrid Resin ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Clinical Difference ◽  
Indirect Composite

Clinical Relevance Indirect resin composite restorations represent a good choice for the therapy of severely damaged teeth. There is no clinical difference between Ormocer and nano-hybrid resin composite after 36 months.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document