scholarly journals 2-year Clinical Evaluation of Sodium Hypochlorite Treatment in the Restoration of Non-carious Cervical Lesions: A Pilot Study

2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 530-535 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. P. A. Saboia ◽  
P. C. Almeida ◽  
A. V. Ritter ◽  
E. J. Swift ◽  
L. A. F. Pimenta
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Sodium Hypochlorite ◽  
Clinical Evaluation ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Acid Etching ◽  
Cervical Lesions ◽  
Composite Restorations

Clinical Relevance The use of 10% sodium hypochlorite to remove exposed collagen after acid-etching did not affect the clinical performance of composite restorations of non-carious cervical lesions.

Clinical Evaluation of Flowable Resins in Non-carious Cervical Lesions: Two-year Results

10.2341/06-93 ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 313-321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ç Çelik ◽  
G. Özgünaltay ◽  
N. Attar
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Evaluation ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Retention Rates ◽  
Cervical Lesions ◽  
Different Types

Clinical Relevance Different types of flowable resin materials placed in non-carious cervical lesions demonstrated acceptable clinical performance, except for the retention rates of Dyract Flow restorations, after two years.

Clinical Evaluation of Ceramic Inlays Compared to Composite Restorations

10.2341/08-95 ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 263-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. T. Lange ◽  
P. Pfeiffer
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Evaluation ◽  
Survival Probability ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Class I ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Ceramic Inlays ◽  
Significant Difference

Clinical Relevance Evopress ceramic inlays and Filtek Z250 composite restorations showed no significant difference regarding survival probability at 57 months when used as Class I and II restoratives in premolars and molars. Both materials demonstrated acceptable clinical performance, with a preference for the ceramic inlays.

Six-year Clinical Evaluation of Packable Composite Restorations

10.2341/08-48 ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Kiremitci ◽  
T. Alpaslan ◽  
S. Gurgan
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Evaluation ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Composite Restorations

Clinical Relevance As a posterior composite, Filtek P60 exhibited very good clinical performance in Class II cavities for six years.

Two-year Clinical Effectiveness of Adhesives and Retention Form on Resin Composite Restorations of Non-carious Cervical Lesions

2009 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 507-515 ◽  
Author(s):  
S-Y. Kim ◽  
K-W. Lee ◽  
S-R. Seong ◽  
M-A. Lee ◽  
I-B. Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Retention Rate ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Clinical Effectiveness ◽  
Marginal Adaptation ◽  
Cervical Lesions ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Observation Period

Clinical Relevance Over a two–year observation period, ScotchBond Multi-Purpose was found to have significantly superior marginal adaptation compared to Adper Prompt. Restorations using retention forms showed a significantly higher retention rate in an experimental adhesive and significantly less marginal discoloration in all three adhesives.

Clinical Comparison of Bur- and Laser-prepared Minimally Invasive Occlusal Resin Composite Restorations: Two-year Follow-up

2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 500-507 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. R. Yazici ◽  
M. Baseren ◽  
J. Gorucu
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Promising Alternative ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Clinical Comparison ◽  
Prepared Composite

Clinical Relevance The laser could be a promising alternative for minimally invasive occlusal resin composite cavity preparations, as its clinical performance was similar to bur-prepared composite restorations.

Clinical Evaluation of Indirect Composite Restorations at Baseline and 36 Months After Placement

2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 156-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Dukic ◽  
O. L. Dukic ◽  
S. Milardovic ◽  
B. Delija
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Evaluation ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Good Choice ◽  
Hybrid Resin ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Clinical Difference ◽  
Indirect Composite

Clinical Relevance Indirect resin composite restorations represent a good choice for the therapy of severely damaged teeth. There is no clinical difference between Ormocer and nano-hybrid resin composite after 36 months.

Clinical Evaluation of an All-in-one Adhesive in Non-Carious Cervical Lesions with Different Degrees of Dentin Sclerosis

2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 370-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. V. Ritter ◽  
H. O. Heymann ◽  
E. J. Swift ◽  
J. R. Sturdevant ◽  
A. D. Wilder
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Evaluation ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Cervical Lesions

Clinical Relevance Lower scores for marginal discoloration and adaptation were noted when an all-in-one self-etching adhesive was applied to non-carious cervical lesions and compared to a three-step total-etch adhesive.

Clinical Evaluation of a Two-step Etch&Rinse and a Two-step Self-etch Adhesive System in Class II Restorations: Two-year Results

2009 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 656-663 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. B. Ermis ◽  
O. Kam ◽  
E. U. Celik ◽  
U. B. Temel
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Evaluation ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Self Etch

Clinical Relevance The two-step etch&rinse and the two-step self-etch adhesive systems tested in this study demonstrated similar clinical performance in Class II cavities after two years.

A Randomized Double-blind Clinical Trial of Dentin Surface Treatments for Composite Restorations in Noncarious Cervical Lesions: A 36-month Evaluation

2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 114-126
Author(s):  
AC Rocha ◽  
MM Suca Salas ◽  
AS Masotti ◽  
WLO da Rosa ◽  
CH Zanchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Acid Etching ◽  
Cervical Lesions ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Class V ◽  
Dentin Surface ◽  
Double Blind Clinical Trial ◽  
Postoperative Sensitivity ◽  
Phosphoric Acid Etching

SUMMARY Objective: This randomized, double-blind clinical trial aimed to evaluate the influence of different dentin surface treatments in noncarious cervical lesions (NCCLs). Methods and Materials: Twenty-nine patients participated in this study. One hundred sixty-five NCCLs were selected and randomly assigned to three groups: G0 (control group) with phosphoric acid etching for 15 seconds; G1: phosphoric acid etching for 30 seconds; and G2: ultrasound probe applied for 30 seconds on the dentin surface. Class V composite resin restorations were performed (Z350, 3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA). The restorations were evaluated at baseline and at six, 12, 24, and 36 months according to the World Dental Federation criteria. Survival curves were obtained using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. Comparisons between groups and times were performed using the McNemar and Chi-square tests (α=0.05). Results: The presence of failures due to retention was statistically different among the groups (p=0.012), and G0 and G2 showed better clinical performance than did G1. Sensitivity decreased over time in all groups. Marginal discoloration, postoperative sensitivity, and marginal adaptation were not different among the groups (p>0.05). Conclusions: The studied dentin surface treatments showed similar clinical performance to the conventional technique at 36 months in terms of marginal discoloration, marginal adaptation, and postoperative sensitivity. In contrast, increased acid-etching time resulted in a higher risk of failure due to retention over time in composite Class V restorations.

Clinical Evaluation of Noncarious Cervical Lesions of Different Extensions Restored With Bulk-fill or Conventional Resin Composite: Preliminary Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. E11-E20
Author(s):  
AMO Correia ◽  
ALB Jurema ◽  
MR Andrade ◽  
ALS Borges ◽  
E Bresciani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Clinical Evaluation ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Resin Composites ◽  
Cervical Lesions ◽  
Intergroup Comparison ◽  
Significant Difference

SUMMARY Purpose: This randomized clinical trial evaluated the influence of the occlusogingival distance (OGD) of noncarious cervical lesions (NCCLs) on the clinical performance of a regular bulk-fill resin composite and a regular nanofilled resin composite. Methods and Materials: A total of 140 restorations were randomly placed in 77 participants by one operator. NCCLs were divided into four groups (n=35) according to OGD (1.5 mm±10% or 3 mm±10%) and resin composites (Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior [B] or Filtek Z350 XT [C]) used: 1.5 mm-B, 1.5 mm-C, 3 mm-B, and 3 mm-C. A two-step self-etch adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond) was applied following manufacturer instructions in all restorative procedures. Restorations were polished 1 week after placement. Clinical evaluation was performed at baseline (7 days), 6 months, and 1 year by two calibrated examiners, according to the modified US Public Health Service criteria evaluating fractures/retention, marginal staining, marginal adaptation, recurrence of caries, anatomic form, postoperative sensitivity, and surface texture. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used for intergroup comparison in each follow-up; the Friedman analysis of variance, followed by the least significant difference test (multiple comparisons) was used for intragroup comparison between baseline and follow-up times (α=0.05). Results: Two restorations were lost at 12 months (1 for 1.5 mm-B and 1 for 3 mm-B). The retention rates at 12 months were 100% for 1.5 mm-C, 97% for 1.5 mm-B, 100% for 3 mm-C; and 97% for 3 mm-B, with no statistical difference among the groups (p=0.570). At 12 months, a statistically significant difference was found among the follow-up times for the same group (1.5 mm-B, 1.5 mm-C, and 3 mm-B) regarding the marginal staining criterion; moreover, the 3 mm-C group showed a significant difference from 6 months. No significant difference was found for the other parameters. Conclusion: Both resin composites showed acceptable clinical performance, and the OGD of NCCLs did not influence the clinical performance of resin composite restorations after 12 months.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document