Effect of Operator-specific Handling on Tooth-composite Interface and Microleakage Formation

10.2341/08-66 ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 200-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Schneider ◽  
I. Busch ◽  
M. Busch ◽  
H. Jentsch ◽  
M. Häfer

Clinical Relevance After calibration of the restoration procedure, three operators experienced differences in tooth-composite interface morphology and microleakage formation. These differences reflect technique-sensitivity of the etch-and-rinse adhesive. The lowest microleakage on dentin was related to an enhanced interface integrity. After additional application of an adhesive component, sealing of the enamel and dentin was partially enhanced, but microleakage formation did not decrease. These results are helpful in the comparative evaluation of other bonding systems.

2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 84-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. E. Mcleod ◽  
R. B. T. Price ◽  
C. M. Felix

Clinical Relevance Despite recent improvements in self-etch bonding systems, a two-step etch and rinse system gave consistently higher shear bond strengths to both ground enamel and dentin and would be the best system to use clinically.


2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 516-525 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Schenke ◽  
K-A. Hiller ◽  
G. Schmalz ◽  
M. Federlin

Clinical Relevance Resin coating improves the marginal seal of partial ceramic crowns to dentin compared to conventional luting, especially at the dentin/composite interface. However, the self-adhesive material RelyX Unicem shows significantly better marginal integrity than the other materials tested.


10.2341/05-55 ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 450-455 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. M. Guéders ◽  
J. F. Charpentier ◽  
A. I. Albert ◽  
S. O. Geerts

Clinical Relevance This study indicates that etch and rinse adhesive systems are less prone to microleakage than self-etch systems.


Author(s):  
Tubayesha Hassan ◽  
MH Sattar

As a means of regular practice in orthodontics and aesthetic dentistry, resin based adhesive systems are being used exclusively. Keeping up with the ever-increasing demand for aesthetic dental treatment all over the world, newer and more improved adhesive systems have been developed. However, regarding the comparison as to which bonding system performs better in clinical perspective, there is lack of existing scientific review articles. In this review, we tend to explore the conventional etch and rinse bonding system and the self-etch primer bonding system. The different tests to assess and compare bond strength between these two types of adhesives from various bibliography are discussed. The results of shear bond strength test, adhesive remnant index (ARI), enamel-adhesive interface using scanning electron microscope (SEM) and the effect of saliva contamination and time are discussed. Interestingly, each system has its strengths and weaknesses. In shear bond strength, self-etch bonding systems clearly exhibits less strength than conventional bonding systems. Resin tags into enamel surface are shorter in self-etch primer adhesives which results from milder etching to enamel compared to the conventional aid-etch and rinse adhesives. Contrarily, the irreversible changes to enamel surface is more aggressive in conventional acid-etching which states that self-etching systems are better according to the principles of minimal intervention dentistry. Ban J Orthod & Dentofac Orthop, April 2017; Vol-7 (1-2), P.20-26


2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 420-427 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Z. Naves ◽  
C. J. Soares ◽  
R. R. Moraes ◽  
L. S. Gonçalves ◽  
M. A. C. Sinhoreti ◽  
...  

Clinical Relevance Increased etching periods may impair the bond strength to ceramics, while the use of an unfilled resin after silane may improve bond strength. The application of a bonding resin may also provide better infiltration to the irregularities created on etched surfaces, irrespective of the conditioning time.


2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 649-654 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. L. Faria-e-Silva ◽  
A. F. Lima ◽  
R. R. Moraes ◽  
E. Piva ◽  
L. R. Martins

Clinical Relevance The effect of QTH and LED curing lights on the degree of conversion of bonding agents is material dependent.


10.2341/08-72 ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 217-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. W. Barkmeier ◽  
R. L. Erickson ◽  
N. S. Kimmes ◽  
M. A. Latta ◽  
T. M. Wilwerding

Clinical Relevance Traditionally, etch-and-rinse adhesive systems have used phosphoric acid to condition enamel surfaces and successfully create a strong, durable bond to resin-based materials. Newer adhesive systems now use acid monomers to bond resin materials to both enamel and dentin. These newer adhesives do not provide the same degree of bonding to enamel as etch-and-rinse systems, and extending the application time does not improve their performance.


10.2341/07-43 ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. W. Brackett ◽  
F. R. Tay ◽  
S. W. Looney ◽  
S. Ito ◽  
L. D. Haisch ◽  
...  

Clinical Relevance Adhesives with self-etching primers, which were evaluated in this study, produced immediate dentin and enamel bond strengths equivalent to the etch-and-rinse product, although they produced less etching of the enamel surface than etching with phosphoric acid.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document