The Durability of Zirconia/Resin Composite Shear Bond Strength using Different Functional Monomer of Universal Adhesives

Objective This study examined the effectiveness of different functional monomers in universal adhesives on zirconia/resin composite bond strength both before and after thermocycling. Four universal adhesives (G-premio bond universal, GPU; Clearfil Tri-S bond universal, CTB; Optibond Universal, OBU; Tetric N-bond universal; TNU), one adhesive (single bond 2; SB2), and one ceramic primer (Clearfil ceramic primer plus, CCP) were used in this study. Materials and Methods Zirconia discs were prepared and embedded in acrylic. Specimens were polished and sandblasted with alumina. The specimens were randomly divided into two groups (24 hours and the thermocycled), and each group was divided into six subgroups (n = 10), according to zirconia surfaces treatments: no Tx, CCP + SB2, GPU, CTB, OBU, TNU. An Ultradent mold was located on top of the treated zirconia surface. The resin composite was filled into the mold and then light-cured. A universal testing device was used to determine the shear bond strength. Statistical Analysis The data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test. Results After water storage for 24 hours, the shear bond strengths were GPU > CCP + SB2 = CTB = OBU = TNU > no Tx (p < 0.05). After thermocycling, the shear bond strengths were CCP + SB2 = GPU = CTB = TNU > OBU > no Tx (p < 0.05). Conclusion The universal adhesives containing 10-MDP exhibited the best performance in the shear bond strength of the zirconia/resin composite interface both before and after thermocycling.

Performance and Fracture Analysis of Composite Interfaces for Semi-Flexible Pavement

Semi-flexible pavement is widely used in pavement engineering due to its excellent rutting resistance; however, it mainly fails due to cracking. Therefore, it is important to understand the properties of the aggregate–mortar–asphalt interfacial transition zone, to better understand the cracking mechanism of the semi-flexible pavement. In this work, we used pull-off tests and digital image analysis technology to compare and analyze the interfacial tensile strength and granite–bitumen–mortar interactions in three types of asphalt (70# matrix asphalt, PG76-22 modified asphalt and S-HV modified asphalt) at different curing ages. The analysis results showed that, for the three different bitumen materials, with settled mortar, the peak interfacial tensile strength values all occurred at approximately 14 d of curing. In addition, the order of the tensile strength followed the order of asphalt penetration degree; the order of the interfacial water damage resistance from weak to strong was 70# asphalt cementation specimen, PG76-22 modified asphalt cementation specimen, and S-HV modified asphalt cementation specimen. The results of this analysis highlight the original contributions of the optimum curing time for the composite interface of semi-flexible pavement materials prepared with different asphalts to reach optimum crack resistance.