Essays on the State Legislative Process

1971 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 613
Author(s):  
Alan J. Wyner ◽  
Donald G. Herzberg ◽  
Jess Unruh
Polity ◽  
1975 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 402-414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stuart H. Rakoff ◽  
Ronald Sarner

2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. S44-S46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanna A. Kite ◽  
Sarah E. Gollust ◽  
Rachel A. Callanan ◽  
Susan R. Weisman ◽  
Sara J. Benning ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Caroline Da Rocha de Moraes

Resumo:Este trabalho tem por objetivo compreender a opinião e o papel expressados pelo Estado com relação à greve operária ocorrida em Curitiba, em julho de 1917. Será analisada a Mensagem ao Congresso Legislativo do Estado publicada em Fevereiro de 1918, escrita pelo  Presidente do Estado do Paraná  Affonso Alves Camargo. A partir desta fonte e de uma bibliografia sobre o tema, será abordado no texto, um breve panorama contextual a respeito do período, uma abordagem a respeito da formação da classe operária em Curitiba e por fim apontar  a sequência de acontecimentos ocorridos durante a greve de 1917 em Curitiba.Palavras-chave: movimentos sociais, greve, Brasil Republicano, classe operária, Curitiba. Abstract:This work has for purpose understanding the opinion and the role expressed by the Brazilian State in relation to the working class strike that happened in Curitiba, in July 1917. We will analyze the message to the State Legislative Congress published in Februry 1918, written by the president of the State of Paraná Affonso Alves Camargo. Through this source and the bibliography about this theme, a short panorama about context of the period will be approach in the text, the making of the working class in Curitiba and, for last, pointing the sequence of the happenings occurred during the strike in Curitiba in 1917.Keywords: social moviments, strike, Republican Brazil, Working class, Curitiba.


Author(s):  
Julian E. Zelizer

This chapter examines how legislators associated with the conservative movement thrived in a congressional process that liberals had helped to create. It first considers how Congress was reformed in the 1970s, focusing on its transition from the committee era to the contemporary era and how the reform coalition of 1958–1974 helped end the committee era. It then compares the contemporary Congress to the committee-era Congress and how the new legislative process contributed to the fortunes of the conservative movement. It also discusses the decentralization and centralization fostered by congressional reforms, the creation of the Conservative Opportunity Society in 1983 by young mavericks in the Republican Party, congressional conservatives' disappointment with the presidency of George H. W. Bush, and the Republican congressional reforms of 1995. The chapter argues that the state endured despite the political success of American conservatism in Congress.


1996 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary Moncrief ◽  
Joel A. Thompson ◽  
William Cassie
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Williams Robert F

This chapter discusses the fact that state constitutions create a legislative branch that is substantially different from the federal Congress. Most importantly, state legislatures exercise reserved, plenary power subject only to limitations in the state or federal Constitutions. The federal Congress, by contrast, exercises enumerated, delegated power. In addition, the state legislatures are subject to a variety of limitations on the process of lawmaking that are contained in state constitutions. The chapter discusses the variety of approaches to judicial enforcement of these procedural limitations. Finally, in a number of states, the state legislature's lawmaking power is shared with the people, who can enact or defeat laws through direct democracy, or the initiative and referendum processes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document