Autobiographie und Geschichte: Wilhelm Dilthey, Georg Misch, Karl Löwith, Gottfried Benn, Alfred Döblin

1997 ◽  
Vol 70 (2) ◽  
pp. 187
Author(s):  
Paul Michael Lützeler ◽  
Wilhelm Dilthey ◽  
Georg Misch ◽  
Karl Löwith ◽  
Gottfried Benn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Wilhelm Dilthey ◽  
Gottfried Benn ◽  
Georg Misch ◽  
Alfred Döblin

scholarly journals Autobiografia jako narzędzie badań historyka idei. Casus „Wspomnień niezależnego” Richarda Pipesa

2021 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 57-72
Author(s):  
Anna Citkowska-Kimla
Keyword(s):  
Political Thought ◽  
Samuel Taylor Coleridge ◽  
History Of Ideas ◽  
Thomas Carlyle ◽  
Johann Gottfried Herder ◽  
Wilhelm Dilthey ◽  
Georg Misch ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Or History

The aim of the article is to develop a research tool for a historian of ideas in the form of an autobiography. It is about framing when a personal document meets the criteria of being a tool for a historian of political thought. The conclusions included the thought that the memories must be meta-considerations on the subject of written autobiography or an analysis of the problem of auto-biography within the framework of the created philosophy or history vision. Examples representing this narrative type were left by, among others, Johann Gottfried Herder, Johann Wolfgang Goethe, Thomas Carlyle, Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Friedrich Nietzsche, Benedetto Croce, Robin G. Collingwood, and in Poland Stanisław Brzozowski. The volume of Richard Pipes’ memoirs, Memoirs of a Non-belonger, which is the foundation for the analysis, has also become part of the trend. The most important thinkers who have studied the issue of autobiography in depth include Wilhelm Dilthey and Georg Misch. The conclusions of the analysis are as follows: autobiography has a philosophical and epistemological meaning in the field of knowledge about human nature. In this sense, autobiography becomes part of anthropology, while anthropology is the foundation for the history of ideas, including political thought.

»Schöpferische Zerstörung« Über ein Philosophem deutscher Intellektueller im Kulturkrieg

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 57-78
Author(s):  
Michael Großheim
Keyword(s):  
Public Debate ◽  
Henri Bergson ◽  
Culture War ◽  
Georg Simmel ◽  
Max Scheler ◽  
Philosophy Of Life ◽  
Creative Power ◽  
Georg Misch ◽  
Alfred Döblin

Georg Simmel is among the intellectuals taking part in the German side of the »Culture War«, parallel to the war 1914–1918. This article discusses three different meanings of »Culture War«: 1. »Culture War« as war about culture, 2. »Culture War« as war by means of culture, 3. »Culture War« as aggravated proceeding of criticism of culture. Among the motives of the »Culture War« is the reproach of »barbarism« made by Henri Bergson against the German side originating from a public debate after the destruction of the Cathedral of Reims. In the reactions of German intellectuals (alongside Georg Simmel were Alfred Döblin, Friedrich Gundolf, Max Scheler and Georg Misch) a reinterpretation of the concept of culture is apparent, inspired by philosophy of life and leading to a peculiar »ethic of the creative power of culture«. Simmel’s examination of the generic case of the Cathedral of Reims conclusively serves as prototype of a criticism of this approach: German intellectuals confuse metaphors stemming from the sphere of nature with those of culture without reflection, thus obliterating essential differences between those spheres.

scholarly journals Entre el espejo, la máscara y la ausencia. Recorrido breve por la teoría de la autobiografía

2021 ◽  
pp. 94-112
Author(s):  
Gabriela Koestinger
Keyword(s):  
Paul De Man ◽  
Wilhelm Dilthey ◽  
Georg Misch ◽  
Siglo Xix ◽  
De Man

En tiempos recientes la escritura autobiográfica ha llegado a ocupar un lugar importante en la escena literaria; frente a esto, la teoría y la crítica han desarrollado una serie de herramientas conceptuales para dar sentido al fenómeno de las literaturas del yo. Este artículo presenta una revisión histórica de los principales conceptos que a partir del siglo XIX se desarrollaron en la teoría de la autobiografía. Se exploran las tres etapas propuestas por James Olney en la década de 1980; en primer lugar, la etapa del bios, compuesta por los trabajos de Wilhelm Dilthey y Georg Misch; en segundo lugar, se aborda la etapa del autos con los planteamientos de Georges Gusdorf y Philippe Lejeune; y finalmente se mira la etapa de la graphía o la ruptura postestructuralista con especial atención en el ensayo “Autobiografía como desfiguración” de Paul de Man.

Perspectivas Interdisciplinaridades e Linguagem nas Ciências Humanas

2005 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 17
Author(s):  
Alzira Lobo de Arruda Campos
Keyword(s):  
Sigmund Freud ◽  
Karl Marx ◽  
Max Weber ◽  
Wilhelm Dilthey ◽  
Michel Serres ◽  
Fernand Braudel

As ciências humanas discutiram a questão da interdisciplinaridade ao longo do século XX. Mas, já no século anterior, figuras notáveis, como Wilhelm Dilthey e Karl Marx, questionavam-se sobre os paradigmas monistas da explicação e da compreensão. Interrogação reproduzida, entre muitos, por Sigmund Freud, Max Weber, Claude Lévi-Strauss, Fernand Braudel, Michel Serres. Em Educação, o grupo de Doutorado em Ciências da Educação, de Paris VIII, há 30 anos adotou a multirreferencialidade como metodologia hegemônica.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document