The Way We Lived in North Carolina

2005 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 507
Author(s):  
Kevin Pittard ◽  
Joe A. Mobley
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Philip Gerard

Maj. Gen George E. Pickett’s attack on New Bern in January 1863 results in a fiasco. Having failed utterly to take the city after seven hours of fighting, the 13,000 troops retreat back to Kinston. On the way, they overwhelm a small outpost battery and capture ninety-seven men of the 2nd North Carolina Union Volunteers. Pickett labels a number of them Confederate deserters-a dubious claim-and, following cursory trials, he hangs twenty-two North Carolinians. The atrocity shocks even his own troops and provokes outrage in the U.S. War Department, which pursues Pickett as a war criminal, forcing him to flee to Canada in disguise.


2014 ◽  

This chapter discusses the circumstances of Ramseur's promotion to the state militia after his resignation from the U.S. Army. It reports that Ramseur applied for a commission in the new Confederate army. The chapter notes that on the way south, Ramseur stopped to see his mentor, Daniel Harvey Hill, who was concluding his tenure as superintendent at the North Carolina Military Institute in Charlotte, and quickly received an appointment as first lieutenant. The chapter further notes that Ramseur was offered a more attractive opportunity on the way to his posting in the Department of Mississippi. It reports that he was immediately elected as captain of the eponymous light battery (Company A, Tenth North Carolina State Troops), and that, within a month's time, he was promoted to the rank of major in the state militia.


1984 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 74
Author(s):  
Edward Byers ◽  
Harry L. Watson
Keyword(s):  

1987 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 103
Author(s):  
David R. Goldfield ◽  
Neil Fulghum
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-59
Author(s):  
Kathryn Wymer ◽  
Collie Fulford

Responding to concerns about a textbook reading that students perceived as heteronormative, cisnormative, and antifeminist, we formed a partnership between students and faculty to reflect on the situation and to workshop ways to move forward. Our discussions were informed by our situation: a public HBCU in North Carolina, a state that had been in the headlines for anti-LGBT legislation. Many students reported that prior to our work they had not felt they had power to challenge the authoritative nature of texts in a classroom, even when they found those texts to be incorrect or inappropriate. This project empowered students to work with faculty and the publisher to change the textbook itself as well as the way certain rhetorical content was taught in our institution.


1984 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 223
Author(s):  
Doris Elizabeth King ◽  
Thomas H. Clayton
Keyword(s):  

2007 ◽  
Vol 68 (4) ◽  
pp. 276-278
Author(s):  
Jane H. Brice ◽  
Roy L. Alson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document