scholarly journals Apical extrusion of root canal filling material during the removal of gutta-percha and resilon

2020 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-99
Author(s):  
Karolina Vukoje ◽  
Ivana Stojsin ◽  
Ivana Kantardzic ◽  
Ognjenka Jankovic
Keyword(s):  
Root Canal ◽  
Chronic Infection ◽  
Filling Material ◽  
Experimental Conditions ◽  
Root Canal Filling ◽  
Filling Materials ◽  
Gutta Percha ◽  
Rotary Instruments ◽  
Apical Extrusion ◽  
Level Of Significance

Introduction. Root canal filling material may be extruded during retreatment through the apical foramen and cause flare-up or chronic infection. The aim of this study was to compare the apical extrusion of gutta-percha and resilon filling materials during retreatment using hand and rotary instruments. Methods. Sixty extracted single-rooted teeth with single, straight canal were selected. Canals were prepared with ProTaper Universal rotary system to a size F2. Two groups (30 teeth in each) were filled with gutta-percha or resilon points, respectively. In both groups teeth were randomly divided into the three subgroups (10 teeth in each), based on the instruments used for retreatment: Hedstrom hand files and two rotary groups- ProTaper and Twisted File instruments. Apical extrusion was detected visually, using a 4-degree scoring system. Mean scores were calculated and analyzed statistically (t-test and ANOVA). The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. Results. Under tested experimental conditions, the type of canal filling material did not have significant effect on the results of apical extrusion during retreatment. Significantly more material was extruded in the resilon group when manual, Hedstrom file was used (1.80 ? 1.13) than rotary ProTaper (0.60 ? 0.70) and Twisted File (0.50 ? 0.71). Conclusions. The use of a rotary technique is recomended to minimize apical extrusion, especially when resilon obturation material is removed during retreatment.

scholarly journals Assessment of Apical Extrusion of Debris during Endodontic Retreatment with 3 Rotary Nickel-Titanium Retreatment Systems and Hand Files

2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-28
Author(s):  
S. Gkampesi ◽  
Z. Mylona ◽  
T. Zarra ◽  
T. Lambrianidis
Keyword(s):  
Root Canal ◽  
Complete Removal ◽  
Filling Material ◽  
Root Canal Filling ◽  
Gutta Percha ◽  
Apical Extrusion ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Level Of Significance ◽  
Hand Instrumentation ◽  
Endodontic Retreatment

SummaryAim: to evaluate the amount of debris extruded apically as well as the time needed for removal of root canal filling material using ProTaper, MTwo, REndo NiTi rotary retreatment systems and hand files.Materials and methods: 60 freshly extracted human single-rooted teeth were instrumented with Protaper files and obturated with gutta-percha and MTA Fillapex sealer with the cold lateral compaction technique. Teeth were then randomly assigned to 4 groups. ProTaper, MTwo, REndo rotary retreatment systems and Hedstroem hand files were utilized for root canal filling removal. Debris extruded apically was collected into pre-weighed vials. The weight of the dry extruded debris was established by subtracting the pre-retreatment and post-retreatment weight of vials. Time needed for reaching WL, complete removal of gutta-percha and total retreatment time were also recorded with a stopwatch. The data obtained were analyzed using One-way ANOVA (the level of significance was set at P=0.05).Results: Hand instrumentation caused significantly more debris extrusion compared with rotary systems (P<0.001). There was no significant difference among the other groups (P>0.05). Hedstroem hand files needed significantly more time for the completion of the retreatment procedure than rotary systems (P<0.001). Among rotary retreatment files, ProTaper completed the procedure significantly quicker than MTwo and REndo (P<0.001).Conclusion: Rotary retreatment files caused less apical extrusion of debris and needed less time for the completion of the retreatment procedure compared to hand files.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Removing Thermafil and GuttaCore from Straight Root Canal Systems Using a Novel Non-Surgical Root Canal Re-Treatment System: A Micro-Computed Tomography Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 1266
Author(s):  
Vicente Faus-Llácer ◽  
Rubén Pérez ◽  
Ignacio Faus-Matoses ◽  
Celia Ruiz-Sánchez ◽  
Álvaro Zubizarreta-Macho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Root Canal ◽  
Treatment System ◽  
Filling Material ◽  
Micro Computed Tomography ◽  
Root Canal Filling ◽  
Filling Materials ◽  
Gutta Percha ◽  
Ct Analysis ◽  
Canal Systems ◽  
Ah Plus

The present study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of an XP-endo non-surgical root canal re-treatment system in removing both GuttaCore and Thermafil gutta-percha carrier-based root canal filling materials from straight root canal systems using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) analysis. The study was performed on 20 single-rooted upper teeth, which were randomly allocated into the following study groups: Group A, Thermafil and AH Plus sealer (n = 10); Group B, GuttaCore and AH Plus sealer (n = 10). Before and after the non-surgical root canal re-treatment procedure, the samples were submitted for a micro-CT analysis. The volume of the root canal filling material (mm3), the volume of the remaining root canal filling material (mm3) and the time (minutes) needed to remove the root canal filling material were also recorded. Student’s t-test was used to analyze the results. No statistically significant differences were found between the volume of the remaining root canal filling material in the GuttaCore and Thermafil root canal filling systems at the coronal third (p = 0.782), middle third (p = 0.838) or apical third (p = 0.882) of the straight root canal systems; however, the GuttaCore required a statistically significant (p = 0.037) shorter amount of time (4.72 ± 0.76 min) to be removed than the Thermafil carrier-based root canal filling material (5.92 ± 1.42 min). The XP-endo Finisher non-surgical endodontic re-treatment system removes both GuttaCore and Thermafil gutta-percha carrier-based root canal filling materials from straight root canal systems, although removal of the GuttaCore gutta-percha carrier-based root canal filling material required less time.

scholarly journals Citric Acid: An Alternative for the Removal of Root Canal Filling Materials 

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catalina Méndez-De-La-Espriella ◽  
Adriana Rodríguez-Ciodaro ◽  
Alejandra Moreno-Sarmiento ◽  
Daniela Mendieta-Flores ◽  
Diana Yori-Roa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Citric Acid ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Morphological Changes ◽  
Filling Material ◽  
Dental Tissue ◽  
Root Canal Filling ◽  
Filling Materials ◽  
Gutta Percha ◽  
Mechanical Removal ◽  
Root Canal Filling Materials

Abstract Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the potential of a smear-layer removing agent (citric acid) vs. an accepted gutta-percha-softening agent (Xylol) as an alternative substance for removing the root canal filling materials, while investigating the potential for associated demineralization effects. Materials and Methods: Seventy healthy, recently extracted premolars were used, ten as control, with sixty with their canals enlarged, shaped and cleaned and obturated using lateral compaction. Teeth were distributed into 3 groups as follows: 1) no solvent and mechanical removal of the filling materials; 2) 1ml of Xylol for 1 minute followed by mechanical removal; and 3) 10% citric acid for 1 minute followed by mechanical removal. Two sections of the root were used, one for Raman spectroscopy analysis to evaluate morphological changes in dentine surface and the other for micro-hardness testing (Vickers). Results: The use of 10% citric acid in in the removal of gutta-percha and sealer was more effective than the Xylol and mechanical group (p<0.05), presented less remnants of filling material debris and with non-observable demineralizing effects. Conclusion: Citric acid might be considered as a viable alternative in the removal of gutta-percha and sealer during root canal retreatment.Clinical Relevance: This research showed how citric acid can be used as an alternative in endodontic retreatment; how efficiently removed the filling material without damaging the dental tissue.

Apical extrusion of thermoplasticized gutta-percha used as a root canal filling

1988 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 128-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary M. Ritchie ◽  
Dale M. Anderson ◽  
Joseph S. Sakumura
Keyword(s):  
Root Canal ◽  
Root Canal Filling ◽  
Gutta Percha ◽  
Apical Extrusion

scholarly journals Healing of a tooth with an overinstrumented apex, extensive transportation and periapical lesion using a 5 mm calcium hydroxide apical plug: an 8-year follow-up report

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 608-611
Author(s):  
Ronaldo Araújo Souza ◽  
Yara T. Corrêa Silva-Sousa ◽  
Suely Colombo ◽  
Maurício Lago ◽  
Marco Antonio Hungaro Duarte ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Calcium Hydroxide ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Apical Periodontitis ◽  
Filling Material ◽  
Root Canal Filling ◽  
Apical Constriction ◽  
Gutta Percha ◽  
Open Apices ◽  
Canal Transportation

Besides the risk of filling material extrusion throughout the apex, a satisfactory apical seal can be difficult to achieve in canals with open apices or iatrogenic enlargements of the apical constriction. These situations pose a challenge to root canal filling. This paper describes the root canal filling of a maxillary right canine with an overinstrumented apex, complete loss of the apical stop, extensive canal transportation and apical periodontitis. A 5 mm calcium hydroxide apical plug was placed before root canal filling. The plug was made by soaking paper points with saline, dipping the points in calcium hydroxide powder and then applying it to the apex several times, until a consistent apical plug was obtained. The canal was then irrigated with saline in order to remove any residual calcium hydroxide from the root canal walls, dried with paper points and obturated with an inverted #80 gutta-percha cone and zinc oxide-eugenol based sealer by the lateral condensation technique. An 8-year radiographic follow-up showed formation of mineralized tissue sealing the apical foramen, apical remodeling and no signs of apical periodontitis.

scholarly journals Sealing Ability of AH Plus and GuttaFlow Bioseal

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Soo-Hyuk Lee ◽  
Soram Oh ◽  
Adel Saeed Al-Ghamdi ◽  
Ayman Omar Mandorah ◽  
Kee-Yeon Kum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fluid Flow ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Glass Ceramics ◽  
Filling Material ◽  
Root Canal Filling ◽  
Measuring Device ◽  
Gutta Percha ◽  
Sealing Ability ◽  
Ah Plus ◽  
The Mean

The objective of root canal obturation is to achieve a fluid-tight seal. Recently, GuttaFlow bioseal (GB), a root canal sealer composed of polydimethylsiloxane, gutta-percha particles, and bioactive glass ceramics, has been developed, to enhance the sealing ability of root canal filling material. The objective of this study was to assess the sealing ability of GB using a subnanoliter-scaled fluid-flow measuring device and to compare with that of AH Plus (AH). The fluid flow in root canal-filled teeth using either gutta-percha cone (GP) with AH (GAR; n = 10) or GP with GB (GBR; n = 10) and in GP inserted in AH blocks (GA; n = 10) or GP inserted in GB blocks (GB; n = 10) was measured. In addition, fluid flow in sealer blocks of AH (A; n = 10) and GB (B; n = 10), which served as negative controls, was measured. Root canal-filled teeth using GP without any sealer (GR) acted as positive controls (n = 10). The leakage was obtained by calculating the volume of moved water by time (s), after stabilization of the fluid flow was achieved. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal–Wallis test and Mann–Whitney U-test with Bonferroni correction. A p value less than 0.00238 (0.05/21) was considered significantly different. The mean leakages (nL/s) in the groups are as follows: GAR, 0.0958 ± 0.0543; GBR, 0.0223 ± 0.0246; GA, 0.0644 ± 0.0803; GB, 0.0267 ± 0.0182; A, 0.0055 ± 0.0057; B, 0.0052 ± 0.005; and GR, 0.2892 ± 0.3018. The mean leakage in the GBR group was lower than that in the GAR group (p = 0.001), while the mean leakages in the GA and GB groups were not significantly different. GuttaFlow bioseal can be useful in single-cone obturation technique.

Coronal Leakage of Teeth Root-Filled With Gutta-Percha or Resilon Root Canal Filling Material

2006 ◽  
Vol 32 (9) ◽  
pp. 879-881 ◽  
Author(s):  
Etienne Pitout ◽  
Theunis Gerhardus Oberholzer ◽  
Elaine Blignaut ◽  
Julitha Molepo
Keyword(s):  
Root Canal ◽  
Filling Material ◽  
Root Canal Filling ◽  
Gutta Percha

scholarly journals Micro-CT Evaluation of Root Filling Removal after Three Stages of Retreatment Procedure

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 612-618 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo Abreu da Rosa ◽  
Manuela Favarin Santini ◽  
Bruno Cavalini Cavenago ◽  
Jefferson Ricardo Pereira ◽  
Marco Antônio Húngaro Duarte ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Root Canal ◽  
Filling Material ◽  
Micro Ct ◽  
Micro Computed Tomography ◽  
Root Canal Filling ◽  
Tomography System ◽  
Filling Materials ◽  
Ct Evaluation ◽  
Ah Plus ◽  
Post Hoc

The aim of this study was to quantify the residual filling material after filling removal, re-preparation with rotary or reciprocating files and passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI). Twenty maxillary molars were prepared using ProTaper instruments up to F1. The teeth were filled with AH Plus and ProTaper gutta-percha points using the single-cone technique. Thereafter, the specimens were scanned using a micro-computed tomography system (Micro-CT #1). Then, the root canal filling was removed using ProTaper Retreatment files, and a new scan was performed (Micro-CT #2). The specimens were divided into two groups according to the instrument used for re-preparation: ProTaper rotary or WaveOne reciprocating files (Micro-CT #3). Finally, PUI was performed, and a new micro-CT scan was performed (Micro-CT #4). Intragroup and intergroup analyses were performed using Friedman and Dunn's post hoc test and the Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn post hoc tests, respectively. Palatal canal presented the highest volume of residual filling material in all stages of endodontic retreatment (p<0.05). The main reduction of filling volume was achieved after using ProTaper Retreament (p<0.05). The amount of remaining filling material after using ProTaper Retreatment was similar to that achieved with rotary and reciprocating files and after PUI (p>0.05). Rotary and reciprocating files achieved similar removal of the root canal filling (p>0.05). The greatest reduction in filling material was achieved after using ProTaper Retreatment files. Rotary and reciprocating instruments and PUI did not improve the removal of root canal filling materials.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document