Coronal Leakage of Teeth Root-Filled With Gutta-Percha or Resilon Root Canal Filling Material

2006 ◽  
Vol 32 (9) ◽  
pp. 879-881 ◽  
Author(s):  
Etienne Pitout ◽  
Theunis Gerhardus Oberholzer ◽  
Elaine Blignaut ◽  
Julitha Molepo
Keyword(s):  
Root Canal ◽  
Filling Material ◽  
Root Canal Filling ◽  
Gutta Percha

scholarly journals Healing of a tooth with an overinstrumented apex, extensive transportation and periapical lesion using a 5 mm calcium hydroxide apical plug: an 8-year follow-up report

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 608-611
Author(s):  
Ronaldo Araújo Souza ◽  
Yara T. Corrêa Silva-Sousa ◽  
Suely Colombo ◽  
Maurício Lago ◽  
Marco Antonio Hungaro Duarte ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Calcium Hydroxide ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Apical Periodontitis ◽  
Filling Material ◽  
Root Canal Filling ◽  
Apical Constriction ◽  
Gutta Percha ◽  
Open Apices ◽  
Canal Transportation

Besides the risk of filling material extrusion throughout the apex, a satisfactory apical seal can be difficult to achieve in canals with open apices or iatrogenic enlargements of the apical constriction. These situations pose a challenge to root canal filling. This paper describes the root canal filling of a maxillary right canine with an overinstrumented apex, complete loss of the apical stop, extensive canal transportation and apical periodontitis. A 5 mm calcium hydroxide apical plug was placed before root canal filling. The plug was made by soaking paper points with saline, dipping the points in calcium hydroxide powder and then applying it to the apex several times, until a consistent apical plug was obtained. The canal was then irrigated with saline in order to remove any residual calcium hydroxide from the root canal walls, dried with paper points and obturated with an inverted #80 gutta-percha cone and zinc oxide-eugenol based sealer by the lateral condensation technique. An 8-year radiographic follow-up showed formation of mineralized tissue sealing the apical foramen, apical remodeling and no signs of apical periodontitis.

scholarly journals Sealing Ability of AH Plus and GuttaFlow Bioseal

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Soo-Hyuk Lee ◽  
Soram Oh ◽  
Adel Saeed Al-Ghamdi ◽  
Ayman Omar Mandorah ◽  
Kee-Yeon Kum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fluid Flow ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Glass Ceramics ◽  
Filling Material ◽  
Root Canal Filling ◽  
Measuring Device ◽  
Gutta Percha ◽  
Sealing Ability ◽  
Ah Plus ◽  
The Mean

The objective of root canal obturation is to achieve a fluid-tight seal. Recently, GuttaFlow bioseal (GB), a root canal sealer composed of polydimethylsiloxane, gutta-percha particles, and bioactive glass ceramics, has been developed, to enhance the sealing ability of root canal filling material. The objective of this study was to assess the sealing ability of GB using a subnanoliter-scaled fluid-flow measuring device and to compare with that of AH Plus (AH). The fluid flow in root canal-filled teeth using either gutta-percha cone (GP) with AH (GAR; n = 10) or GP with GB (GBR; n = 10) and in GP inserted in AH blocks (GA; n = 10) or GP inserted in GB blocks (GB; n = 10) was measured. In addition, fluid flow in sealer blocks of AH (A; n = 10) and GB (B; n = 10), which served as negative controls, was measured. Root canal-filled teeth using GP without any sealer (GR) acted as positive controls (n = 10). The leakage was obtained by calculating the volume of moved water by time (s), after stabilization of the fluid flow was achieved. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal–Wallis test and Mann–Whitney U-test with Bonferroni correction. A p value less than 0.00238 (0.05/21) was considered significantly different. The mean leakages (nL/s) in the groups are as follows: GAR, 0.0958 ± 0.0543; GBR, 0.0223 ± 0.0246; GA, 0.0644 ± 0.0803; GB, 0.0267 ± 0.0182; A, 0.0055 ± 0.0057; B, 0.0052 ± 0.005; and GR, 0.2892 ± 0.3018. The mean leakage in the GBR group was lower than that in the GAR group (p = 0.001), while the mean leakages in the GA and GB groups were not significantly different. GuttaFlow bioseal can be useful in single-cone obturation technique.

scholarly journals Comparison of apical sealing ability of resected mineral trioxide aggregate, gutta-percha and a resin-based root canal filling material (resilon)

2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (51) ◽  
pp. 10516-10519
Author(s):  
Froughreyhani Mohammad ◽  
Salem Milani Amin ◽  
Rahimi Saeed ◽  
Shakouie Sahar ◽  
Fateh Somaieh
Keyword(s):  
Root Canal ◽  
Mineral Trioxide Aggregate ◽  
Filling Material ◽  
Root Canal Filling ◽  
Gutta Percha ◽  
Sealing Ability

scholarly journals Analysis of sealing ability of root canal sealers using scanning electronic microscopy technique

2010 ◽  
Vol 138 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 694-698 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirjana Vujaskovic ◽  
Nevenka Teodorovic
Keyword(s):  
Root Canal ◽  
Filling Material ◽  
Scanning Electronic Microscopy ◽  
Electronic Microscopy ◽  
Good Adhesion ◽  
Root Canal Filling ◽  
Adhesion Properties ◽  
Microscopy Technique ◽  
Gutta Percha ◽  
Sealing Ability

Introduction. An ideal endodontic sealer should adhere firmly both to dentin and to gutta-percha. Objective. The aim of this study was to evaluate the adhesion of the root canal filling to dentin and gutta-percha using scanning electronic microscopy (SEM). Methods. The sealing ability of endodontic sealers to dentinal walls of the root canal was assessed in recently extracted human single canal premolars. Twenty teeth were prepared using the crown-down technique and irrigated with 3% NaOCl. A total of 20 samples were divided into two groups. The root canals were obturated using Ketac-Endo Aplicap and GutaFlow. The sealing ability and adhesion properties at the sealer-dentin interface were studied using SEM and the results were rated from 1 to 3; extremely good adhesion (rated 1), good adhesion (rated 2) and a relatively good adhesion (rated 3). Results. The results showed extremely good adhesion on Ketac-Endo and GuttaFlow dentin interface. GuttaFlow has strong adhesion (rated 1) to gutta-percha in comparison with Ketac-Endo to gutta-percha interface (rated 2). Conclusion. New GuttaFlow filling material has a strong sealing ability and excellent adhesion to dentinal walls and gutta-percha cones. Ketac-Endo showed excellent bond to dentin with a slightly weaker adhesion capacity to the gutta-percha cones in comparison to GuttaFlow.

scholarly journals Apical extrusion of root canal filling material during the removal of gutta-percha and resilon

2020 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-99
Author(s):  
Karolina Vukoje ◽  
Ivana Stojsin ◽  
Ivana Kantardzic ◽  
Ognjenka Jankovic
Keyword(s):  
Root Canal ◽  
Chronic Infection ◽  
Filling Material ◽  
Experimental Conditions ◽  
Root Canal Filling ◽  
Filling Materials ◽  
Gutta Percha ◽  
Rotary Instruments ◽  
Apical Extrusion ◽  
Level Of Significance

Introduction. Root canal filling material may be extruded during retreatment through the apical foramen and cause flare-up or chronic infection. The aim of this study was to compare the apical extrusion of gutta-percha and resilon filling materials during retreatment using hand and rotary instruments. Methods. Sixty extracted single-rooted teeth with single, straight canal were selected. Canals were prepared with ProTaper Universal rotary system to a size F2. Two groups (30 teeth in each) were filled with gutta-percha or resilon points, respectively. In both groups teeth were randomly divided into the three subgroups (10 teeth in each), based on the instruments used for retreatment: Hedstrom hand files and two rotary groups- ProTaper and Twisted File instruments. Apical extrusion was detected visually, using a 4-degree scoring system. Mean scores were calculated and analyzed statistically (t-test and ANOVA). The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. Results. Under tested experimental conditions, the type of canal filling material did not have significant effect on the results of apical extrusion during retreatment. Significantly more material was extruded in the resilon group when manual, Hedstrom file was used (1.80 ? 1.13) than rotary ProTaper (0.60 ? 0.70) and Twisted File (0.50 ? 0.71). Conclusions. The use of a rotary technique is recomended to minimize apical extrusion, especially when resilon obturation material is removed during retreatment.

Resilon-Epiphany Obturation System

2011 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-32
Author(s):  
Vanitha U. Shenoy ◽  
M.V. Sumanthini
Keyword(s):  
Root Canal ◽  
Synthetic Polymer ◽  
Filling Material ◽  
Root Canal Filling ◽  
Gutta Percha ◽  
Effective Seal

Abstract For over hundred years Gutta Percha (GP) has been the most common material used for the obturation of the root canal. GP was the standard with which newer materials were tested. GP fulfills all the characteristics of an ideal root canal filling material, but has a disadvantage of not being able to seal the root canal on its own and requires a sealer for providing an effective seal. In an attempt to overcome this draw back a new root canal filling material was introduced, called, Resilon which is a thermoplastic synthetic polymer-based root canal filling material and Epiphany being the sealer. This material has the ability of forming a Monoblock with the root canal. The properties of this material has been studied, it has shown promising results and has emerged as a alternative to GP.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Removing Thermafil and GuttaCore from Straight Root Canal Systems Using a Novel Non-Surgical Root Canal Re-Treatment System: A Micro-Computed Tomography Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 1266
Author(s):  
Vicente Faus-Llácer ◽  
Rubén Pérez ◽  
Ignacio Faus-Matoses ◽  
Celia Ruiz-Sánchez ◽  
Álvaro Zubizarreta-Macho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Root Canal ◽  
Treatment System ◽  
Filling Material ◽  
Micro Computed Tomography ◽  
Root Canal Filling ◽  
Filling Materials ◽  
Gutta Percha ◽  
Ct Analysis ◽  
Canal Systems ◽  
Ah Plus

The present study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of an XP-endo non-surgical root canal re-treatment system in removing both GuttaCore and Thermafil gutta-percha carrier-based root canal filling materials from straight root canal systems using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) analysis. The study was performed on 20 single-rooted upper teeth, which were randomly allocated into the following study groups: Group A, Thermafil and AH Plus sealer (n = 10); Group B, GuttaCore and AH Plus sealer (n = 10). Before and after the non-surgical root canal re-treatment procedure, the samples were submitted for a micro-CT analysis. The volume of the root canal filling material (mm3), the volume of the remaining root canal filling material (mm3) and the time (minutes) needed to remove the root canal filling material were also recorded. Student’s t-test was used to analyze the results. No statistically significant differences were found between the volume of the remaining root canal filling material in the GuttaCore and Thermafil root canal filling systems at the coronal third (p = 0.782), middle third (p = 0.838) or apical third (p = 0.882) of the straight root canal systems; however, the GuttaCore required a statistically significant (p = 0.037) shorter amount of time (4.72 ± 0.76 min) to be removed than the Thermafil carrier-based root canal filling material (5.92 ± 1.42 min). The XP-endo Finisher non-surgical endodontic re-treatment system removes both GuttaCore and Thermafil gutta-percha carrier-based root canal filling materials from straight root canal systems, although removal of the GuttaCore gutta-percha carrier-based root canal filling material required less time.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document