scholarly journals EXPLICIT EXPRESSION FOR THE MAGNETIC FIELD DUE TO A CURRENT LOOP.

1972 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. S. McNeilly
Author(s):  
Way-Jam Chen ◽  
Lily Shiau ◽  
Ming-Ching Huang ◽  
Chia-Hsing Chao

Abstract In this study we have investigated the magnetic field associated with a current flowing in a circuit using Magnetic Force Microscopy (MFM). The technique is able to identify the magnetic field associated with a current flow and has potential for failure analysis.


Geophysics ◽  
1982 ◽  
Vol 47 (7) ◽  
pp. 1068-1077 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. M. Hoversten ◽  
H. F. Morrison

The electric field induced within four layered models by a repetitive current wave form in a circular loop transmitter is presented along with the resulting magnetic fields observed on the surface. The behavior of the induced electric field as a function of time explains the observed sign reversal of the vertical magnetic field on the surface. In addition, the differences between magnetic field responses for different models are explained by the behavior of the induced electric fields. The pattern of the induced electric field is shown to be that of a single “smoke ring,” as described by Nabighian (1979), which is distorted by layering but which remains a single ring system rather than forming separate smoke rings in each layer.


Author(s):  
Rui Liu ◽  
Surya P. Vanka ◽  
Brian G. Thomas

In this paper we study the particle transport and deposition in a turbulent square duct flow with an imposed magnetic field using Direct Numerical Simulations (DNS) of the continuous flow. A magnetic field induces a current and the interaction of this current with the magnetic field generates a Lorentz force which brakes the flow and modifies the flow structure. A second-order accurate finite volume method in time and space is used and implemented on a GPU. Particles are injected at the entrance to the duct continuously and their rates of deposition on the duct walls are computed for different magnetic field strengths. Because of the changes to the flow due to the magnetic field, the deposition rates are different on the top and bottom walls compared to the side walls. This is different than in a non-MHD square duct flow, where quadrant (and octant) symmetry is obtained.


It is well known that in a magnetic field bismuth shows a greater change of resistance than any other substance, and it is also known that in the case of a crystal this phenomenon varies very much with the orientation of the crystal. A great deal of literature exists on this subject. The general view of the phenomenon is that the increase of resistance is largest when the cleavage plane of the crystal is parallel to the magnetic field, and when the current is flowing perpendicular to it. It is also known that the resistance in a magnetic field increases very rapidly with decreasing temperature. A complication in all these phenomena arises through certain time lags. When a current is passed through bismuth placed in a magnetic field, the resistance at the first moment is large, and then gradually decreases to its final value. This time lag accounts for the fact, first discovered by Lenard, that bismuth has a larger resistance for alternating currents than for direct currents. This phenomenon also depends on the crystal state of the bismuth.


A Current can be measured absolutely in the electro-magnetic system of units either by means of the action of the current on a magnet, or of the current on a current. The former method has the disadvantage that at least two independent measurements are necessary. For example, in using an electro-magnetic balance, the strength of the magnet acted on by the electric circuit has to be determined, as well as the force exerted on the magnet by the circuit. In galvanometers, either of the sine or tangent type, the magnetic field produced by the electric circuit is compared with the earth’s horizontal field, the strength of which is determined independently. Further, as the strength of artificial magnets cannot be regarded as truly constant, and the earth’s field is subject to diurnal and secular variations, this class of measurement is not ideal. In the electrodynamic class of measurement the mutual action between two or more coils carrying current takes the form of a torque, as in electrodynamometers, or a direct force, as in current weighers. In electrodynamometers the torque may be measured with a bifilar suspension, the torsion of a wire or spring, or by means of a gravity balance. Current weigher measurements are almost always made by direct comparison with gravity, which is believed to be constant, and is known to a higher degree of accuracy than the strengths of any magnet or magnetic field that has yet been measured.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document