EFFECT OF DIFFERENT DENTIN CONDITIONING AGENTS ON THE TENSILE BOND STRENGTH OF A SELF- ETCH ADHESIVE SYSTEM

2017 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 1699-1707
Author(s):  
Mayada Elsaid ◽  
Mirvat Salama ◽  
Magda Shalaby
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Tensile Bond Strength ◽  
Dentin Conditioning ◽  
Self Etch

scholarly journals The difference of tensile bond strength between total and self etch adhesive systems in dentin

2010 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Selly Yusalina ◽  
Moch. Richata Fadil ◽  
Milly Armilia
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Tensile Bond Strength ◽  
Single Bond ◽  
Conservation Area ◽  
Composite Resin Restoration ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Self Etch

Total etch adhesive system has been widely used in teeth conservation area as an adhesive agent before implicating composite resin restoration agent. The aim of this research is to prove the difference of tensile bond strength between total etch (Single Bond) and self etch adhesive system (Adper prompt L-Pop) on dentin surface in vitro. The extracted and non carries maxillary premolar teeth were used in this research and were divided into 2 groups. The first group comprised 15 specimen teeth etched in phosphoric acid and was applicated with the Single Bond adhesive agent. The second group comprised 15 specimen teeth, applicated with the Adper Prompt-L-Pop. The composite resin (Z 350, 3M) was applied incrementally and each of the layers was rayed for 20 seconds. The specimens were stored in physiologic solution before they were tested. Tensile bond strength was measured by LRX Plus Lloyd Instrument, with 1 N load and 1 mm/minute speed, and the measurement result was in Mpa unit. The result was evaluated statistically by the Student t-test with α = 0.05. Single Bond (the 5th generation) showed a better bond strength compared to the Adper Prompt-L-Pop (the 6th generation).

scholarly journals Bond strength to dentin of total-etch and self-etch adhesive systems

2014 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 365-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo Alves dos SANTOS ◽  
Eliane Alves de LIMA ◽  
Mônica Maria de Albuquerque PONTES ◽  
Alexandre Batista Lopes do NASCIMENTO ◽  
Marcos Antônio Japiassú Resende MONTES ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Single Bond ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Healthy Human ◽  
Universal Testing ◽  
Stereo Microscope ◽  
Diamond Disc ◽  
Self Etch

OBJECTIVE: To assess the bond strength to dentin of the Single Bond (3M ESPE) and XP Bond (Dentsply) total-etch and Adper SE Plus (3M ESPE) self-etch adhesive systems. METHODS: Fifteen healthy human third molars were randomly allocated across three different groups of five teeth each according to the adhesive system. The occlusal portion of each tooth was removed under refrigeration using a flexible diamond disc (EXTEC, Enfield, CT, USA) down to an area of dentin that did not reveal enamel, as confirmed under a 40X stereo microscope (Ramsor, São Paulo, Brazil). A standardized smear layer was created with #600 grit silicon-carbide paper. The adhesive systems were applied as per manufacturer recommendations, with the exception of the Adper SE Plus system, which was triple-polymerized. Composite resin blocks (5 mm) were placed on the dentin surface. The specimens were stored in distilled water for 24 hours at 37ºC. Using a flexible diamond disc (EXTEC, Enfield, CT, USA), toothpick-like specimens with an adhesive area of less than 1 mm² were obtained. A microtensile bond test was then carried out using a universal testing machine (KRATOS) with a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's test were used for comparisons. RESULTS: The bond strength values obtained with each adhesive system were as follows: XP Bond, 96.24 MPa; Adper Single Bond, 72.39 MPa; Adper SE Plus, 49.91 MPa. CONCLUSION: In terms of bond strength to dentin, conventional adhesives outperform self-etching systems.

Effect of salivary contamination on micro-tensile bond strength of self-etch adhesives systems after bonding procedure

2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ibrahim Umar ◽  
Muhammet Yalçin ◽  
Fuat Ahmetoglu ◽  
Ayse Dündar ◽  
Ali Keles ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Tensile Bond Strength ◽  
Self Etch

scholarly journals Evaluation of experimental calcium-containing primer in adhesive system on micro-tensile bond strength and acid resistance

2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 565-572 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yukina OCHIAI ◽  
Go INOUE ◽  
Toru NIKAIDO ◽  
Masaomi IKEDA ◽  
Junji TAGAMI
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Acid Resistance ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Tensile Bond Strength

scholarly journals Influence of irrigating agents on fiber postpush-out bond strength to radicular dentin sections with the different adhesive system

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (03) ◽  
pp. 380-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satheesh B. Haralur ◽  
Asim Nasser A. Alasabi ◽  
Sultan A. Abohathrah Al Qahtani ◽  
Saeed Musleh S. Alqahtani
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Negative Influence ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Coronal Section ◽  
Group B ◽  
Self Etch ◽  
Push Out

ABSTRACT Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of irrigating agents on push-out bond strength of resin postcemented with various adhesive systems at different radicular dentin sections. Materials and Methods:Sixty single-rooted premolar teeth were root canal treated, subsequently decorated at cementoenamel junction. The endodontic postspace was irrigated with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) for Group A (n = 30) and Group B (n = 30), respectively. The sample from each group was subdivided into three groups (10) according to luting protocol of etch-wash, self-etch, and self-adhesive. Individual teeth with cemented resin postsamples were sectioned into coronal, middle, and apical segments. Subsequently, subjected for pushout bond strength test by applying a load at 0.5 mm/min speed. The data were analyzed by three-way analysis of variance and Tukey comparison test at a significant difference level of 0.05.Results: The coronal section with 5.25% NaOCl irrigation and self-etch luting protocol provided the highest push out strength at 16.282 Mpa. The etch-wash luting protocol in both irrigations showed the lesser bond strength at 8.273 and 8.493 MPa, respectively, in coronal section.Conclusions: The self-etch adhesive system showed better push out bond strength and 17% EDTA had a negative influence on self-etch bond strength. The coronal sections had highest bond strength in comparison with apical radicular dentin sections.

scholarly journals Durability of Enamel Bonding Using One-step Self-etch Systems on Ground and Unground Enamel

10.2341/08-58 ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Reis ◽  
S. K. Moura ◽  
A. Pellizzaro ◽  
K. Dal-Bianco ◽  
A. M. Andrade ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Water Storage ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
One Step ◽  
Bond Strengths ◽  
Self Etch

Clinical Relevance The improvement of resin-enamel bond strengths after using Si-C paper and diamond burs for enamel preparation is material dependent. No degradation of enamel bond strength could be observed for any one-step self-etch adhesive system after 12 months of water storage.

scholarly journals Effect of chlorhexidine on the bond strength of a self-etch adhesive system to sound and demineralized dentin

2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 218-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Anne Sampaio de-Melo ◽  
Diego da Costa Goes ◽  
Maria Denise Rodrigues de-Moraes ◽  
Sérgio Lima Santiago ◽  
Lidiany Karla Azevedo Rodrigues
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Self Etch ◽  
Demineralized Dentin

scholarly journals The Effect of SnCl2/AmF Pretreatment on Short- and Long-Term Bond Strength to Eroded Dentin

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katrin Zumstein ◽  
Anne Peutzfeldt ◽  
Adrian Lussi ◽  
Simon Flury
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Failure Mode ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Short And Long Term ◽  
One Year ◽  
And Storage ◽  
Self Etch

This study investigated the effect of SnCl2/AmF pretreatment on short- and long-term bond strength of resin composite to eroded dentin mediated by two self-etch, MDP-containing adhesive systems. 184 dentin specimens were produced from extracted human molars. Half the specimens (n=92) were artificially eroded, and half were left untreated. For both substrates, half the specimens were pretreated with SnCl2/AmF, and half were left untreated. The specimens were treated with Clearfil SE Bond or Scotchbond Universal prior to application of resin composite. Microtensile bond strength (μTBS) was measured after 24 h or 1 year. Failure mode was detected and EDX was performed. μTBS results were statistically analyzed (α=0.05). μTBS was significantly influenced by the dentin substrate (eroded < noneroded dentin) and storage time (24 h > 1 year; p<0.0001) but not by pretreatment with SnCl2/AmF or adhesive system. The predominant failure mode was adhesive failure at the dentin-adhesive interface. The content of Sn was generally below detection limit. Pretreatment with SnCl2/AmF did not influence short- and long-term bond strength to eroded dentin. Bond strength was reduced after storage for one year, was lower to eroded dentin than to noneroded dentin, and was similar for the two adhesive systems.

Effect of low fluency dentin conditioning on tensile bond strength of composite bonded to Er:YAG laser-prepared dentin: a preliminary study

2010 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Bahrami ◽  
N. Askari ◽  
M. Tielemans ◽  
D. Heysselaer ◽  
L. Lamard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Er:Yag Laser ◽  
Tensile Bond Strength ◽  
Preliminary Study ◽  
Dentin Conditioning

scholarly journals Rebonding of Orthodontic Brackets

2008 ◽  
Vol 78 (3) ◽  
pp. 531-536 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mona A. Montasser ◽  
James L. Drummond ◽  
Carla A. Evans
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Orthodontic Brackets ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Adhesive Remnant Index ◽  
Acid Etch ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Self Etch

Abstract Objective: To compare rebonding of orthodontic brackets based on the hypothesis that no difference would be found between the adhesive systems with respect to shear bond strength, mode of failure, and clinical failure rates. Materials and Methods: The three adhesive systems included two self-etch primers (Transbond and M-Bond) and a conventional phosphoric acid etch (Rely-a-Bond). The sample size was 20 premolars for each adhesive system. The shear bond strength was tested 24 hours after bracket bonding with the bonding/debonding procedures repeated two times after the first debonding. Bond strength, adhesive remnant index (ARI), and failure sites were evaluated for each debonding. Statistical analysis consisted of a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Scheffè analysis. The clinical portion evaluated 15 patients over a 12-month period. Results: The mean shear bond strengths after the first, second, and third debondings for Rely-a-Bond were 8.4 ± 1.8, 10.3 ± 2.4, and 14.1 ± 3.3 MPa, respectively; for Transbond 11.1 ± 4.6, 13.6 ± 4.5, and 12.9 ± 4.4 MPa, respectively; and for M-Bond 8.7 ± 2.7, 10.4 ± 2.4, and 12.4 ± 3.4 MPa, respectively. After the three debondings the mean shear bond strength increased significantly from the first to the third debonding for Rely-a-Bond and M-bond (P ≤ .001), but did not change for Transbond (P = .199). Conclusions: The original hypothesis is not rejected. The two self-etching primers showing higher or comparable bond strength to the conventional phosphoric etch with less adhesive remnant on the enamel surface after the first debonding. With repeated bonding/debonding, the differences in the bond strength, ARI, and failure site were not significantly different. There was no difference in the clinical performance of the three adhesive systems (P = .667).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document