scholarly journals The Effect of SnCl2/AmF Pretreatment on Short- and Long-Term Bond Strength to Eroded Dentin

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katrin Zumstein ◽  
Anne Peutzfeldt ◽  
Adrian Lussi ◽  
Simon Flury
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Failure Mode ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Short And Long Term ◽  
One Year ◽  
And Storage ◽  
Self Etch

This study investigated the effect of SnCl2/AmF pretreatment on short- and long-term bond strength of resin composite to eroded dentin mediated by two self-etch, MDP-containing adhesive systems. 184 dentin specimens were produced from extracted human molars. Half the specimens (n=92) were artificially eroded, and half were left untreated. For both substrates, half the specimens were pretreated with SnCl2/AmF, and half were left untreated. The specimens were treated with Clearfil SE Bond or Scotchbond Universal prior to application of resin composite. Microtensile bond strength (μTBS) was measured after 24 h or 1 year. Failure mode was detected and EDX was performed. μTBS results were statistically analyzed (α=0.05). μTBS was significantly influenced by the dentin substrate (eroded < noneroded dentin) and storage time (24 h > 1 year; p<0.0001) but not by pretreatment with SnCl2/AmF or adhesive system. The predominant failure mode was adhesive failure at the dentin-adhesive interface. The content of Sn was generally below detection limit. Pretreatment with SnCl2/AmF did not influence short- and long-term bond strength to eroded dentin. Bond strength was reduced after storage for one year, was lower to eroded dentin than to noneroded dentin, and was similar for the two adhesive systems.

scholarly journals Aplikasi klorheksidin glukonat 2%pada dentin tidak mempengaruhi kuat rekat geserkomposit resinyangmenggunakansistem adesif self etch (2% Chlorhexidine gluconate application on dentine does not affect bond strength of resin composite using self etch adhesive system)

2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 7
Author(s):  
Dewi Puspitasari ◽  
Andi Soufyan ◽  
Ellyza Herda
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Chlorhexidine Gluconate ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Group I ◽  
Self Etch

Composite resin is a widely used aesthetic restoration. The restoration can fail due to secondary caries. Chlorhexidinegluconate 2% is used as a cavity disinfectant to eliminate microorganisms on the prepared cavity and to prevent thesecondary caries. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of chlorhexidine gluconate 2% to the bondstrength of composite resin with self etch system adhesive on dentine. Sixteen specimens of buccal dentine of premolarscrown are divided into 2 different groups. Group I: Clearfil SE Bond self-etch primer was applied for 20 seconds,Clearfil SE Bond bonding was applied for 5 seconds and polymerized for 10 seconds. Composite resin was constructedincrementally and polymerized for 20 seconds. Group II: prior to self etch primer application as in group I,chlorhexidine gluconate 2% was applied for 15 seconds. Shear bond strength was tested using Testing machine andanalyzed with unpaired T test. The highest shear bond strength was obtained by applying chlorhexidine gluconate 2%.The study concludes that chlorhexidine gluconate 2% application to dentine did not affect significantly to the bondstrength composite resin using self etch adhesive systems.

scholarly journals Aging Protocols and Their Effects on Bond Strength of Total-Etch and Self-Etch Adhesive Systems to Dentin

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 408-415
Author(s):  
Isabella A. Gomes ◽  
Mário G. N. Gomes ◽  
Flávia L. B. Amaral ◽  
Fabiana M. G. França ◽  
Roberta T. Basting ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Failure Mode ◽  
Failure Modes ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Artificial Saliva ◽  
Mixed Data ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
One Step ◽  
Self Etch ◽  
Conventional Type

Objective: This study investigated whether different aging protocols have effects on the bond strength of total-etch and self-etch adhesive systems to dentin substrate. Methods: Molars were sectioned exposing the dentin, which was submitted to restorative procedures using two-step total-etch (ASB, Adper SingleBond2), two-step self-etch (CLF, Clearfil SEBond), or one-step self-etch (OPT, Optibond All-in-One) system and resin composite. The obtained blocks were sectioned to result in sticks to be submitted to bond strength and failure mode tests after 24h storage in distilled water (DW), or 180-day aging protocols in DW, artificial saliva (AS), citric acid (CA), or thermal cycling (TC). The types of failures were classified as adhesive, cohesive in dentin, cohesive in composite resin, and mixed. Data were analyzed using ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test (α=5%). The failure modes were descriptive under the relative frequencies form. Results: It was observed that ASB presented the higher bond strength(p<0.05), while CLF and OPT did not demonstrate differences between them(p>0.05) after 24h. The bond strength obtained with ASB significantly overcame that of OPT when stored in DW or AS for 180 days (p<0.001). In these storing mediums, ASB did not differ from CLF(p>0.05), while in CA or TC the values of CLF were significantly lower (p<0.001). In TC aging, the values presented by OPT did not differ from ASB(p>0.05), both of which had higher values than CLF(p<0.05). The predominant failure mode was adhesive. Conclusion: For the two-step total-etch and two-step self-etch adhesives, the influence of aging in AS and TC was equivalent to that of storage in DW. The most deleterious effects occurred in CA, a situation in which self-etch adhesives displayed worse performance than the conventional type.

scholarly journals Effect of Dentin Pretreatment with Arginine on Microshear Bond Strength of Etch-and-Rinse or Self-Etch Adhesive Systems

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (02) ◽  
pp. 199-205
Author(s):  
Gabriela Oliveira Borgo ◽  
Waldemir Francisco Vieira-Junior ◽  
Jéssica Dias Theobaldo ◽  
Flávio Henrique Baggio Aguiar ◽  
Débora Alves Nunes Leite Lima
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Conventional Technique ◽  
Fracture Pattern ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Sem Images ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Composite Resin Restorations ◽  
Self Etch

Abstract Objective The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of dentin pretreatment with 8% arginine on the immediate and 6-month bond strength (BS) of adhesive systems and surface morphology of dentin. Materials and Methods Dentin bovine specimens (5 × 5 mm) were allocated into following pretreatments: without pretreatment (conventional technique, C) or exposure to arginine solution (A) for 5 minutes prior to tooth restoration. The adhesive procedure was performed using (n = 12): 3-step etch-and-rinse adhesive (Scotchbond Multipurpose—SBMP [C+SBMP and A+SBMP]); 2-step etch-and-rinse adhesive (Single Bond 2 - SB [C+SB and A+SB]); or 2-step self-etch adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond - CSEB [C+CSEB and A+CSEB]). After 24 hours, the composite resin restorations were evaluated immediately and after 6 months of water storage using a microshear test and fracture pattern. The dentin surface exposed to A was assessed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The immediate BS data were submitted to a two-way analysis of variance and Tukey's test, and the long-term BS results were analyzed using Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn tests (α = 0.05). Results There was a significant decrease in immediate and 6-month BS for the A+SB and A+CSEB groups, which differed statistically from the C group. The fracture pattern was predominantly adhesive for SB and CSEB adhesive for C and A. The SEM images presented a different conditioning pattern of the dentin exposed to A. Conclusion The dentin pretreatment with arginine interfered negatively in the immediate and long-term BS of the simplified adhesive system. However, the SBMP adhesive was not affected by arginine pretreatment presenting the most satisfactory results.

scholarly journals Effect Of Chitosan Treatment On Shear Bond Strength Of Composite To Deep Dentin Using Self-Etch And Total-Etch Adhesive Systems

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fateme Vasei ◽  
Farahnaz Sharafeddin
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Single Bond ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Self Etch

Objective: To assess the shear bond strength (SBS) of resin composite to deep dentin, using 1 and 2.5% chitosan pretreatment as well as different adhesive systems. Material and Methods: 80 human maxillary molars were randomly divided to eight groups according to the type of adhesive system and dentin pretreatment (n = 10): I) two-step self-etch system (Clearfil SE bond); II) two-step etch-andrinse system (Adper single bond 2); III) 2.5% chitosan + Clearfil SE bond; IV) 2.5% chitosan +etch + Adper single bond 2; V) etch + 2.5% chitosan + Adper single bond 2; VI) 1% chitosan + Clearfil SE bond; VII) 1% chitosan + etch + Adper single bond 2; VIII) etch + 1% chitosan + Adper single bond 2 (chitosan solution (w/v): 2.5 g and 1 g of chitosan (Sigma Aldrich, USA) was dissolved in 100 ml of 1% acetic acid). Plastic molds were positioned on dentin and filled with composite (Z350, 3M ESPE, USA). SBS (MPa) was tested using a universal testing machine. ANOVA tests, Tukey’s test, and independent t test were used to analyze data (p < 0.05). Results: The highest SBS value among self-etch groups was observed with 1% chitosan (p = 0.001). In the etch-and-rinse group, the SBS of 1% chitosan was significantly lower than the other groups. Chitosan treatment following acid etching led to higher SBS in comparison to when chitosan was applied before etching, with the significant difference in 1% concentration (p = 0.030). A predominance of mix fractures was observed in dentin. Conclusion: Improved dentin bond strength can be achieved through immediate dentin pretreatment with 1% chitosan in self-etch adhesive systems. Chitosan Pretreatment may not be advantageous for etch-and-rinse adhesive systems. Keywords Adhesive system; Chitosan; Deep dentin; Shear strength.

Repair Bond Strength of High-viscosity Glass-ionomer Cements Using Resin Composite Bonded with Light- and Self-cured Adhesive Systems

2021 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-53
Author(s):  
HA El-Deeb ◽  
EH Mobarak
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
High Viscosity ◽  
Atraumatic Restorative Treatment ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cements ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
One Step ◽  
Self Etch

Clinical Relevance High-viscosity glass-ionomer cements (HVGICs) used with atraumatic restorative treatment can be repaired with light- or self-cured adhesive systems; however, the repair bond strength of two-step, self-etching and one-step adhesives in the light-cure mode surpass one-step self-cure adhesives. Working on a feasible self-cure approach in the absence of such in rural areas as well as in war zones is of prime importance. SUMMARY Objectives: Despite the success rate of high-viscosity glass-ionomer cements (HVGICs) used in atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) restorations, partial or bulk fracture of the proximal portion has been recorded to be one of the main causes of proximal restoration failures. Repair of these restorative materials requires a practical solution, especially in cases where there is a lack of electricity. Thus, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the repair microshear bond strength (μSBS) of three HVGICs using a resin composite in association with adhesive systems having different curing modes (ie, light- vs self-curing mode). Methods and Materials: A total of 105 discs (12 mm in diameter and 2 mm thick) of three HVGICs: GC Fuji IX GP Fast (GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan); Fuji IX GP glass-ionomer cement containing chlorhexidine (GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan); and ChemFil Rock zinc-reinforced HVGIC (Dentsply De-Trey GmbH, Konstanz, Germany) were prepared. Each specimen was divided into three horizontal sections, according to the tested adhesive system or curing mode: Clearfil SE Bond 2 (two-step, self-etch adhesive); (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc., Tokyo, Japan) in light-cure mode; Clearfil Universal Bond (one-step, self-etch adhesive); (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc., Tokyo, Japan) in light-cure mode; or Clearfil Universal Bond (one-step, self-etch adhesive); (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc., Tokyo, Japan) in self-cure mode, mixing it with Clearfil DC Activator (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc., Tokyo, Japan). A resin composite microcylinder was bonded to each horizontal section of each specimen using starch tubes. The bonded discs were stored in artificial saliva at 37°C for 24 hours. A μSBS test was conducted using a universal testing machine, while failure modes were determined using scanning electron microscopy. Data were statistically analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), one-way ANOVA, and Bonferroni post hoc tests (α=0.05). Results: Two-way ANOVA revealed a statistically significant effect for the adhesive systems (p&lt;0.01) and not for the HVGICs (p=0.05) nor their interactions (p=0.99). When using Clearfil SE Bond 2 and Clearfil Universal in a light-cure mode, significantly higher μSBS values were found when compared with Clearfil Universal in a self-cure mode. Conclusions: The three tested HVGICs can be successfully repaired using two-step or one-step self-etch adhesive systems. The one-step self-etch adhesive system in light-cure mode is preferred when compared with the self-cure mode.

Shear Bond Strength of Different Adhesive Systems to Primary Dentin and Enamel

2007 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carla Miranda ◽  
Luiz Henrique Maykot Prates ◽  
Ricardo de Souza Vieira ◽  
Maria Cristina Marino Calvo
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Failure Mode ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Mode Analysis ◽  
Single Bond ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Mean Values ◽  
Failure Mode Analysis ◽  
Distal Direction

The aims of this study were to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of four adhesive systems applied to primary dentin and enamel and verify, after SBS testing, the failure mode of the adhesive interface. Sixty extracted sound primary molars were selected and crowns were sectioned in a mesial-distal direction. Specimens were randomly assigned into two groups (adhesion to enamel and adhesion to dentin) and then subdivided into four subgroups according to the adhesive system (n=15): Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (SMP) – Single Bond (SB) – Clearfil SE Bond (and Adper Prompt LPop (APL) – SBS tests were performed and the obtained values were statistically analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey tests (p&lt;0.05). The failure mode analysis was performed with a Scanning Electron Microscope (XL-30, Philips). SBS mean values on enamel were [MPa (SD)]: SMP – 27.89 (7.49); SB – 23.92 (8.8); CSB – 24.36 (6.69); APL – 25.96 (4.08); and on dentin: SMP – 17.29 (4.25); SB – 18.2 (8.74); CSB – 16.13 (7.14); APL – 6.04 (3.35). The predominant failure mode was cohesive (primarily of the bonding agent). On enamel SBS was statistically similar for all four adhesives. On dentin SBS of APL was lower than the other tested adhesives.

scholarly journals Bond strength to dentin of total-etch and self-etch adhesive systems

2014 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 365-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo Alves dos SANTOS ◽  
Eliane Alves de LIMA ◽  
Mônica Maria de Albuquerque PONTES ◽  
Alexandre Batista Lopes do NASCIMENTO ◽  
Marcos Antônio Japiassú Resende MONTES ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Single Bond ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Healthy Human ◽  
Universal Testing ◽  
Stereo Microscope ◽  
Diamond Disc ◽  
Self Etch

OBJECTIVE: To assess the bond strength to dentin of the Single Bond (3M ESPE) and XP Bond (Dentsply) total-etch and Adper SE Plus (3M ESPE) self-etch adhesive systems. METHODS: Fifteen healthy human third molars were randomly allocated across three different groups of five teeth each according to the adhesive system. The occlusal portion of each tooth was removed under refrigeration using a flexible diamond disc (EXTEC, Enfield, CT, USA) down to an area of dentin that did not reveal enamel, as confirmed under a 40X stereo microscope (Ramsor, São Paulo, Brazil). A standardized smear layer was created with #600 grit silicon-carbide paper. The adhesive systems were applied as per manufacturer recommendations, with the exception of the Adper SE Plus system, which was triple-polymerized. Composite resin blocks (5 mm) were placed on the dentin surface. The specimens were stored in distilled water for 24 hours at 37ºC. Using a flexible diamond disc (EXTEC, Enfield, CT, USA), toothpick-like specimens with an adhesive area of less than 1 mm² were obtained. A microtensile bond test was then carried out using a universal testing machine (KRATOS) with a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's test were used for comparisons. RESULTS: The bond strength values obtained with each adhesive system were as follows: XP Bond, 96.24 MPa; Adper Single Bond, 72.39 MPa; Adper SE Plus, 49.91 MPa. CONCLUSION: In terms of bond strength to dentin, conventional adhesives outperform self-etching systems.

Effect of a novel prime‐and‐rinse approach on short‐ and long‐term dentin bond strength of self‐etch adhesives

2019 ◽  
Vol 127 (6) ◽  
pp. 547-555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mingxing Li ◽  
Jingqiu Xu ◽  
Ling Zhang ◽  
Chaoyang Wang ◽  
Xiaoting Jin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Short And Long Term ◽  
Self Etch

scholarly journals Rebonding of Orthodontic Brackets

2008 ◽  
Vol 78 (3) ◽  
pp. 531-536 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mona A. Montasser ◽  
James L. Drummond ◽  
Carla A. Evans
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Orthodontic Brackets ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Adhesive Remnant Index ◽  
Acid Etch ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Self Etch

Abstract Objective: To compare rebonding of orthodontic brackets based on the hypothesis that no difference would be found between the adhesive systems with respect to shear bond strength, mode of failure, and clinical failure rates. Materials and Methods: The three adhesive systems included two self-etch primers (Transbond and M-Bond) and a conventional phosphoric acid etch (Rely-a-Bond). The sample size was 20 premolars for each adhesive system. The shear bond strength was tested 24 hours after bracket bonding with the bonding/debonding procedures repeated two times after the first debonding. Bond strength, adhesive remnant index (ARI), and failure sites were evaluated for each debonding. Statistical analysis consisted of a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Scheffè analysis. The clinical portion evaluated 15 patients over a 12-month period. Results: The mean shear bond strengths after the first, second, and third debondings for Rely-a-Bond were 8.4 ± 1.8, 10.3 ± 2.4, and 14.1 ± 3.3 MPa, respectively; for Transbond 11.1 ± 4.6, 13.6 ± 4.5, and 12.9 ± 4.4 MPa, respectively; and for M-Bond 8.7 ± 2.7, 10.4 ± 2.4, and 12.4 ± 3.4 MPa, respectively. After the three debondings the mean shear bond strength increased significantly from the first to the third debonding for Rely-a-Bond and M-bond (P ≤ .001), but did not change for Transbond (P = .199). Conclusions: The original hypothesis is not rejected. The two self-etching primers showing higher or comparable bond strength to the conventional phosphoric etch with less adhesive remnant on the enamel surface after the first debonding. With repeated bonding/debonding, the differences in the bond strength, ARI, and failure site were not significantly different. There was no difference in the clinical performance of the three adhesive systems (P = .667).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document