scholarly journals Evaluation of experimental calcium-containing primer in adhesive system on micro-tensile bond strength and acid resistance

2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 565-572 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yukina OCHIAI ◽  
Go INOUE ◽  
Toru NIKAIDO ◽  
Masaomi IKEDA ◽  
Junji TAGAMI
2003 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 342-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcelo Giannini ◽  
Patrícia Chaves ◽  
Marcelo Tavares de Oliveira

This in vitro study evaluated the effect of tooth age on the tensile bond strength of Prime & Bond NT adhesive system to dentin. Human third molars from the five age groups were analyzed: A- 17 to 20yrs, B- 21 to 30yrs, C- 31 to 40yrs, D- 41 to 50yrs and E- 51 to 63yrs. The occlusal enamel was removed using a diamond saw under water cooling and the dentin surface was wet-ground with 600-grit SiC paper to obtain flat surfaces. The adhesive system was applied according to the manufacturer's instructions and a 6-mm high resin "crown" was built-up with resin composite. Teeth were stored for 24 hours in distilled water at 37ºC and prepared for micro-tensile testing. Each specimen was mounted in a testing jig attached to a universal testing machine and stressed in tension at a crosshead speed of 0.5mm/min until failure. The means of tensile bond strength were (MPa): A- 21.42 ± 7.52ª; B- 30.13 ± 10.19ª; C- 31.69 ± 11.78ª; D- 30.69 ± 8.47ª and E- 35.66 ± 9.54ª. No statistically significant difference was observed among the age groups (p > 0.05). The results suggested that the tensile bond strength of the adhesive system was not significantly affected by dentin aging.


2010 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Selly Yusalina ◽  
Moch. Richata Fadil ◽  
Milly Armilia

Total etch adhesive system has been widely used in teeth conservation area as an adhesive agent before implicating composite resin restoration agent. The aim of this research is to prove the difference of tensile bond strength between total etch (Single Bond) and self etch adhesive system (Adper prompt L-Pop) on dentin surface in vitro. The extracted and non carries maxillary premolar teeth were used in this research and were divided into 2 groups. The first group comprised 15 specimen teeth etched in phosphoric acid and was applicated with the Single Bond adhesive agent. The second group comprised 15 specimen teeth, applicated with the Adper Prompt-L-Pop. The composite resin (Z 350, 3M) was applied incrementally and each of the layers was rayed for 20 seconds. The specimens were stored in physiologic solution before they were tested. Tensile bond strength was measured by LRX Plus Lloyd Instrument, with 1 N load and 1 mm/minute speed, and the measurement result was in Mpa unit. The result was evaluated statistically by the Student t-test with α = 0.05. Single Bond (the 5th generation) showed a better bond strength compared to the Adper Prompt-L-Pop (the 6th generation).


2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paulo César G. Silva ◽  
Mariane Gonçalves ◽  
Telma N. do Nascimento ◽  
André Luiz B. Centola

This study evaluated the efficiency of air abrasion alone and associated with phosphoric acid etching on tensile bond strength of a single-bottle adhesive/indirect composite restorative system (Bond 1/Alert) to human enamel. Forty enamel surfaces from extracted human third molars were assigned to 4 groups (n= 10). Mach 4.1 (Kreativ Inc.) air abrasion equipment was used for 20 s. A special system of rod pairs aligned in a specific apparatus was used for tensile strength tests, according to ISO/TR 11405 standard (1994) with some modifications. Bond strength means were: G1 (air abrasion + rinsing + condensable composite resin Alert) = 3.46 ± 0.83 MPa; G2 (air abrasion + rinsing + Bond 1 adhesive system + Alert) = 4.00 ± 1.60 MPa; G3 (air abrasion + rinsing + 37% phosphoric acid + rinsing + Bond 1 + Alert) = 20.80 ± 3.95 MPa; and G4 (37% phosphoric acid + rinsing + Bond 1 + Alert) = 17.00 ± 2.74 MPa. The statistical analysis by Kruskal-Wallis test revealed that G1 and G2 presented statistically significant difference (p< 0.05) from G3 and G4 (p<0.01) and G1 and G3 did not differ significantly (p> 0.05) from G2 and G4, respectively.


2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea M. D. de Mello ◽  
Fabiano A. S. Mello ◽  
Edmir Matson ◽  
Adriana B. Mattos ◽  
Guilerme S. Mello

Author(s):  
Rina Andréa Pelegrine ◽  
Alexandre Sigrist De Martin ◽  
Rodrigo Sanches Cunha ◽  
André Antonio Pelegrine ◽  
Carlos Eduardo da Silveira Bueno

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-68
Author(s):  
H Afshar ◽  
M Ghandehari ◽  
S Amiri ◽  
Z Mirzayi ◽  
M Pourali ◽  
...  

Molecules ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (8) ◽  
pp. 2136
Author(s):  
Shaokang Zhang ◽  
Ru Wang ◽  
Linglin Xu ◽  
Andreas Hecker ◽  
Horst-Michael Ludwig ◽  
...  

This paper studies the influence of hydroxyethyl methyl cellulose (HEMC) on the properties of calcium sulfoaluminate (CSA) cement mortar. In order to explore the applicability of different HEMCs in CSA cement mortars, HEMCs with higher and lower molar substitution (MS)/degree of substitution (DS) and polyacrylamide (PAAm) modification were used. At the same time, two kinds of CSA cements with different contents of ye’elimite were selected. Properties of cement mortar in fresh and hardened states were investigated, including the fluidity, consistency and water-retention rate of fresh mortar and the compressive strength, flexural strength, tensile bond strength and dry shrinkage rate of hardened mortar. The porosity and pore size distribution were also analyzed by mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP). Results show that HEMCs improve the fresh state properties and tensile bond strength of both types of CSA cement mortars. However, the compressive strength of CSA cement mortars is greatly decreased by the addition of HEMCs, and the flexural strength is decreased slightly. The MIP measurement shows that HEMCs increase the amount of micron-level pores and the porosity. The HEMCs with different MS/DS have different effects on the improvement of tensile bond strength in different CSA cement mortars. PAAm modification can improve the tensile bond strength of HEMC-modified CSA cement mortar.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document