scholarly journals Competitive Price Discrimination: The Exercise of Market Power Without Anticompetitive Effects (Comment on Klein and Wiley)

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan B. Baker
Keyword(s):  
Market Power ◽  
Price Discrimination ◽  
Competitive Price

Competitive Price Discrimination

2001 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 579 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Armstrong ◽  
John Vickers
Keyword(s):  
Price Discrimination ◽  
Competitive Price

scholarly journals Las patentes como límite a la innovación tecnológica

2021 ◽  
pp. 99-130
Author(s):  
Alejandro Pérez ◽  
Soto Domínguez ◽  
Katherine Flórez Pinilla
Keyword(s):  
Economic Theory ◽  
Theoretical Analysis ◽  
Key Words ◽  
Market Power ◽  
Technological Innovation ◽  
Price Discrimination ◽  
Technological Development ◽  
Jel Classification ◽  
Patent Law ◽  
Palabras Clave

This paper analyzes from the Austrian School of Economics inte-llectual property patents, understood as a legislative mechanism to encourage entrepreneurial behavior that will lead to innovation and technological de-velopment. We take the case for patents in the pharmaceutical sector, in which we find empirical evidence corroborating the hypothesis of the school, through a theoretical analysis based on issues identified around the patent, such as price discrimination, research limited to certain pathologies, unlimited market power, barriers to national technological development, high costs of protection by the state. Key words: Action Incentives, Entrepreneurship, Patent Law, Economic Theory and Technological Innovation. JEL Classification: B53, L43, K11, K23. Resumen: El presente artículo tiene por objeto analizar desde el marco de la Escuela Austriaca la propiedad intelectual reflejada en las patentes, entendidas como un mecanismo del legislador para incentivar una conducta empresarial que impulse la innovación y el desarrollo tecnológico. Se tomó como caso las patentes en el sector farmacéutico, obteniendo a partir de éste evidencia empírica y la corroboración de las hipótesis de la escuela, por medio de un análisis teórico a la luz de los problemas identificados al-rededor de la patente, tales como: discriminación de precios, investigación parcializada en ciertas enfermedades, poder de mercado ilimitado, barreras al desarrollo tecnológico nacional, altos costos de protección por parte del Estado. Palabras clave: Incentivos de la Acción, Empresarialidad, Derecho de Paten-tes, Teoría Económica e Innovación Tecnológica. Clasificación JEL: B53, L43, K11, K23.

scholarly journals Competitive Imperfect Price Discrimination and Market Power

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Belleflamme ◽  
Wing Man Wynne Lam ◽  
Wouter Vergote
Keyword(s):  
Market Power ◽  
Price Discrimination

Prohibition of Price Discrimination Practice Under Law No. 5 Of 1999 On Prohibition of Monopoly Practices and Unhealthy Business Competition

Authentica ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hangga Prajatama
Keyword(s):  
Market Power ◽  
Price Discrimination ◽  
Subject Matter ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Business World ◽  
Business People ◽  
Legal Documents ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Barrier To Entry

In the business world, business competition or competence among business people in seizing the market is very reasonable. However, this becomes unnatural when the competition is carried out in an unfair manner, with the aim of preventing other business actors from competing (barrier to entry) or shutting down competitors' businesses. One form of anti unfair competition carried out by business actors in creating market power has been anticipated in Law Number 5 of 1999, namely the existence of price discrimination. The research method used is normative juridical, namely legal research that emphasizes the review of legal documents and library materials related to the subject matter. Based on the research that has been done, there is an Article that Regulates Regarding Price Discrimination in Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition, which is located in Article 6 which states that business actors are prohibited from making agreements that cause one buyer to pay a price that is different from the price that must be paid by other buyers for the same goods and / or services. and the Guidelines for the Business Competition Supervisory Commission on Implementation Provisions in Article 6 of Act Number 5 of 1999 concerning Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition.Keywords: Prohibition, Price Discrimination, Law No. 5 of 1999.

scholarly journals Noncompetitive Pricing and Exchange Rate Pass-Through in Selected U.S. and Thai Rice Markets

1994 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 406-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. K. Yumkella ◽  
L. J. Unnevehr ◽  
P. Garcia
Keyword(s):  
Exchange Rate ◽  
Market Power ◽  
Price Discrimination ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Pricing To Market ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Trade Model ◽  
Inelastic Demand ◽  
Pass Through ◽  
Exchange Rate Pass Through

AbstractA “pricing to market” international trade model is applied to U.S. and Thai rice exports to high and middle income countries that are continuous rice importers. These markets are characterized by strong quality preferences and highly inelastic demand, and thus exporters may exercise market power. Evidence of noncompetitive pricing either through price discrimination across destinations or through imperfect exchange rate pass-through is found in this small but growing segment of the international rice trade.

scholarly journals Food Retailers' Pricing and Marketing Strategies, with Implications for Producers

2006 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 221-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lan Li ◽  
Richard J. Sexton ◽  
Tian Xia
Keyword(s):  
Market Power ◽  
Marketing Strategies ◽  
Stylized Facts ◽  
Farm Sector ◽  
Competitive Price ◽  
Food Retailers ◽  
Retailer Behavior

This paper examines grocery retailers' ability to influence prices charged to consumers and paid to suppliers. We discuss how retailer market power manifests itself in terms of pricing and marketing strategies by setting forth and offering evidence in support of eight “stylized facts” of retailer pricing and brand decisions. We argue that little, if any, of this behavior can be explained by a model of a competitive, price-taking retailer, but that most of the indicated behavior was also inconsistent with traditional models of market power. Finally, we discuss the impacts of aspects of this retailer behavior on the upstream farm sector.

scholarly journals Market power and price discrimination in the US market for higher education

2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 201-225
Author(s):  
Dennis Epple ◽  
Richard Romano ◽  
Sinan Sarpça ◽  
Holger Sieg ◽  
Melanie Zaber
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Market Power ◽  
Price Discrimination ◽  
The Us

scholarly journals Competitive Price Discrimination Strategies in a Vertical Channel Using Aggregate Retail Data

2003 ◽  
Vol 49 (9) ◽  
pp. 1121-1138 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Besanko ◽  
Jean-Pierre Dubé ◽  
Sachin Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Price Discrimination ◽  
Vertical Channel ◽  
Competitive Price
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document