Effect of Early Childhood Development Interventions Implemented by Healthcare Providers to Improve Cognitive Outcomes in Children Aged 0-36 Months: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raeena Hirve ◽  
Claire Adams ◽  
Clare B. Kelly ◽  
Dan R. McAullay ◽  
Lisa Hurt ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Klébya Hellen Dantas Oliveira ◽  
Géssica Mercia Almeida ◽  
Muriel Bauermann Gubert ◽  
Amanda Souza Moura ◽  
Ana Maria Spaniol ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ndwakhulu Stephen Tshishonga

In the developing world alone, there are over 200 million children who are in need of immediate early childhood development interventions. Most affected by poor or lack of quality ECD are the poor and those children in low income households. Early childhood development interventions protect children against the effects of poverty, poor nutrition, inadequate healthcare, and a lack of education. Globally, various ECD programme interventions in communities clearly indicate that communities and families want quality ECD programmes for their children at a cost that is affordable. In South Africa, quality early childhood development interventions could have a significant effect in reducing poverty and inequality. This chapter interrogates the challenges and benefits of extending quality ECE & D particularly to disadvantaged and materially deprived children in South African informal settlements. The chapter is based empirical research as well as secondary data in the form of books, book chapters, and accredited journals.


2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 269-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann Christin E Nilsen

The provision of early childhood development services is expanding in developing countries. The rationale behind this expansion is rooted in developmental psychology, socio-economic and human rights narratives. However, there are some limitations to this rationale, which are in particular related to the implicit universalism it assumes. This article outlines how early childhood development interventions imply a policing of families and childhood, which calls for a stronger consideration of context. As a consequence, the scope of what counts as evidence in early childhood development research needs to be questioned. The article is a theoretical contribution to the discourse of what early childhood development ‘does’. A critical approach, addressing the ideals and values that are communicated in early childhood development programmes and how they relate to dominant parenting ideals and practices in the society in question, should be an integral part of the expansion of early childhood development in the global South in the future.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. e0229006
Author(s):  
Kylie A. Dankiw ◽  
Margarita D. Tsiros ◽  
Katherine L. Baldock ◽  
Saravana Kumar

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document