Revisit to 'Fundamental Re-Examination of Keynesian Economics and Monetarism As Portfolio Adjustment Theories:' Recent Japanese Macroeconomic Data Too Suggest the Advisability of Dismissing the Stock Approaches to the Quantity Theory of Money and Also of Its Reconstruction According to a Flow Approach Based Upon Stable Expectations for Nominal Income

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shigetaro Wakabayashi
1992 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 67-87
Author(s):  
Nur Keyder

The velocity of money (V) indicates the number of times money stock turns over in the economy to accommodate a given level of transactions (proxied by GNP). In other words, velocity measures the relationship between nominal income and the money stock. In the original version of the quantity theory of money, nominal income is equal to velocity times money stock; i.e. Py = MV where P stands for the price level, y is real income, M is the money stock. In this framework, when velocity is assumed to be constant, changes in money stock can create predictable effects on the nominal income.


1978 ◽  
Vol 84 ◽  
pp. 65-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.G.P. Matthews ◽  
P.A. Ormerod

The economists at the Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis in the United States have produced over a number of years a series of models which amount to a reassertion of the short-run quantity theory of money. This theory has been summarised by Tobin as ‘in the short-run, nominal income is proportional to the supply of money, although changes in nominal income may affect output as well as prices’. In other words, it is postulated that in the short-run there is a large and rapid influence of monetary actions on nominal income relative to that of fiscal actions and, indeed, that fiscal action unaccompanied by changes in money has little net effect on national output even in the short-run. This is an extreme version of the monetarist position, given that most monetarists, including Friedman, choose to work in the framework of the long-run rather than the shortrun quantity theory.


1983 ◽  
Vol 62 (10) ◽  
pp. 5
Author(s):  
John L. Burbidge
Keyword(s):  

1984 ◽  
Vol 63 (9) ◽  
pp. 7
Author(s):  
Tom Medlrum
Keyword(s):  

2008 ◽  
pp. 31-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Glazyev

The article critically considers basic postulates of quantity theory of money. It shows that they reflect the static state of the economy in abstract models of market equilibrium but do not prove true in actual economic processes. In contrast to monetarists’ view, prices can rise as well as fall even if other variables of the monetarist equation are stable. Thus it cannot be used for grounding monetary policy. The author comes to the conclusion on the dogmatism of Russian monetary authorities that seriously hinders the country’s economic development. He proposes to switch to market organization of money supply basing on regulation of the refinancing rate.


2006 ◽  
pp. 71-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Rozmainsky

The article examines the issues concerning links between institutional economics, Post Keynesian economics, models of endogenous growth and transition economics. The author considers interrelations between ineffective institutional environment, too high degree of fundamental uncertainty, investor myopia and resulting decrease in investment and "negative" growth in Russia’s transitional economy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document