Friedman on the Quantity Theory and Keynesian Economics

1972 ◽  
Vol 80 (5) ◽  
pp. 883-905 ◽  
Author(s):  
Don Patinkin
Keyword(s):  
Quantity Theory ◽  
Keynesian Economics

Japanese drop economic batch quantity ‘theory’

1983 ◽  
Vol 62 (10) ◽  
pp. 5
Author(s):  
John L. Burbidge
Keyword(s):  
Quantity Theory

Economic batch quantity theory discussion widens

1984 ◽  
Vol 63 (9) ◽  
pp. 7
Author(s):  
Tom Medlrum
Keyword(s):  
Quantity Theory

On Practical Validity of Quantity Theory of Money, or How Much the Dogmatism of Monetary Authorities Costs

2008 ◽  
pp. 31-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Glazyev
Keyword(s):  
Monetary Policy ◽  
Economic Development ◽  
Money Supply ◽  
Market Equilibrium ◽  
Static State ◽  
Quantity Theory ◽  
Monetary Authorities ◽  
State Of The Economy ◽  
Market Organization

The article critically considers basic postulates of quantity theory of money. It shows that they reflect the static state of the economy in abstract models of market equilibrium but do not prove true in actual economic processes. In contrast to monetarists’ view, prices can rise as well as fall even if other variables of the monetarist equation are stable. Thus it cannot be used for grounding monetary policy. The author comes to the conclusion on the dogmatism of Russian monetary authorities that seriously hinders the country’s economic development. He proposes to switch to market organization of money supply basing on regulation of the refinancing rate.

"Investor Myopia" in Post Keynesian Theory and in the Russian Economy

2006 ◽  
pp. 71-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Rozmainsky
Keyword(s):  
Endogenous Growth ◽  
Institutional Economics ◽  
Institutional Environment ◽  
Transitional Economy ◽  
Transition Economics ◽  
Keynesian Economics ◽  
Russian Economy ◽  
Fundamental Uncertainty ◽  
High Degree ◽  
Negative Growth

The article examines the issues concerning links between institutional economics, Post Keynesian economics, models of endogenous growth and transition economics. The author considers interrelations between ineffective institutional environment, too high degree of fundamental uncertainty, investor myopia and resulting decrease in investment and "negative" growth in Russia’s transitional economy.

Theorizing About Post-Keynesian Economics in Australasa

2013 ◽  
pp. 411-435
Author(s):  
Paul Dalziel ◽  
J. W. Nevile
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Economic Growth ◽  
Monetary Policy ◽  
World War Ii ◽  
Fiscal Policy ◽  
Aggregate Demand ◽  
World War ◽  
Keynesian Economics ◽  
Low Levels ◽  
Monetary And Fiscal Policy

There was much in common in the development of post-Keynesian economics in Australia and New Zealand, but there were also many differences. Both countries shared a common heritage in higher education. In the first twenty-five years after World War II, both countries adopted broadly Keynesian policies and experienced very low levels of unemployment. Increasingly over these years more theorizing about macroeconomic policy had what now would be called a post-Keynesian content, but this label was not used till after the event. In both countries, apart from one important factor, the experience of actual monetary policy and theorizing about it were similar. Keynesian ideas were more rapidly adopted in Australia than in many other countries. Not surprisingly for a couple of decades after 1936, analysis of policy and its application was Keynesian rather than post-Keynesian, with fiscal policy playing the major role. The conduct of both monetary and fiscal policy depends on the theory of inflation. This chapter examines post-Keynesian economics in Australasia, focusing on aggregate demand, economic growth, and income distribution policy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document