L’uso di internet nelle indagini sulle condizioni economiche delle famiglie: futuro prossimo o remoto? (Mind the Mode: Lessons from a Web Survey on Household Finances)

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Romina Gambacorta ◽  
Martina Lo Conte ◽  
Manuela Murgia ◽  
Andrea Neri ◽  
Roberta Rizzi ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 20-21
Author(s):  
MICHELE G. SULLIVAN
Keyword(s):  

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasuhiro Kitamura ◽  
Masayoshi Shigemori ◽  
Takayuki Masuda ◽  
Naohiro Akiu

Global health is at a crossroads. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development has come with ambitious targets for health and health services worldwide. To reach these targets, many more billions of dollars need to be spent on health. However, development assistance for health has plateaued and domestic funding on health in most countries is growing at rates too low to close the financing gap. National and international decision-makers face tough choices about how scarce health care resources should be spent. Should additional funds be spent on primary prevention of stroke, treating childhood cancer, or expanding treatment for HIV/AIDS? Should health coverage decisions take into account the effects of illness on productivity, household finances, and children’s educational attainment, or should they just focus on health outcomes? Does age matter for priority-setting or should it be ignored? Are health gains far in the future less important than gains in the present? Should higher priority be given to people who are sicker or poorer? This book provides a framework for how to think about evidence-based priority-setting in health. Over 18 chapters, ethicists, philosophers, economists, policymakers, and clinicians from around the world assess the state of current practice in national and global priority-setting, describe new tools and methodologies to address establishing global health priorities, and tackle the most important ethical questions that decision-makers must consider in allocating health resources.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 5331
Author(s):  
Nicolás C. Bronfman ◽  
Paula B. Repetto ◽  
Pamela C. Cisternas ◽  
Javiera V. Castañeda

The COVID-19 pandemic forced people worldwide to implement a series of preventive hygiene and distancing measures that have significantly altered their way of life. This study examined an adapted version of the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) on adopting preventive behavior against COVID-19. Data was collected using a web survey completed by 1004 college students a few weeks after the first wave of infections in Chile. Our findings show that the subjective norm was the strongest predictor of adopting preventive behaviors, followed by the knowledge level and perceived behavioral control. Contrary to expectations, we found no evidence that an attitude towards preventive action predicted actual adoption of preventive behavior against COVID-19. However, knowledge and social norms play a significant role. We discuss implications for effective risk communication.


Author(s):  
MARCIN HITCZENKO

Abstract This article develops a two-stage statistical analysis to identify and assess the effect of a sample bias associated with an individual’s household role. Survey responses to questions about the respondent’s role in household finances and a sampling design in which some households have all members take the survey enable the estimation of distributions for each individual’s share of household responsibility. The methodology is applied to the 2017 Survey of Consumer Payment Choice. The distribution of responsibility shares among survey respondents suggests that the sampling procedure favors household members with higher levels of responsibility. A bootstrap analysis reveals that population mean estimates of monthly payment instrument use that do not account for this type of sample misrepresentation are likely biased for instruments often used to make household purchases. For checks and electronic payments, our analysis suggests that it is likely that unadjusted estimates overstate true values by 10–20 percent.


2009 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. A252
Author(s):  
M Péntek ◽  
V Brodszky ◽  
LÁ Gulácsi ◽  
K Érsek ◽  
NJA Exel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document