Thin Capitalization Rule vs Interest Barrier

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Göritzer
Keyword(s):  
Interest Barrier ◽  
Thin Capitalization

Thin Capitalization, Transfer Pricing Aggresiveness, Penghindaran Pajak

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-28
Author(s):  
Teza Deasvery Falbo ◽  
Amrie Firmansyah
Keyword(s):  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Linear Regression ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Transfer Pricing ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Tax Avoidance ◽  
Total Sample ◽  
Multiple Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Tax Revenue ◽  
Thin Capitalization

The increase in tax revenue in Indonesia is not accompanied by an increase in tax ratio The low tax ratioindicatestax avoidance practices in Indonesia. Some tax avoidance practices can be conductedthrough transferpricing and thin capitalization.This study is aimed to examine empirically the effect of thin capitalization as well astransfer pricing aggressiveness on tax avoidance practice in Indonesia. This study uses manufacturing companieswhich are listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) within the period 2013-2015. Using purposive sampling, theselected samples in this study are 90 companies, so the total sample is 270 samples. The hypothesis examinationused in this study is multiple linear regression analysis of panel data.The results of this study suggest that thincapitalization is positively associated with tax avoidance,while transfer pricing aggressivenessis not associated withtax avoidance.

scholarly journals Substitution across profit shifting methods and the impact on thin capitalization rules

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gideon Goerdt ◽  
Wolfgang Eggert
Keyword(s):  
Multinational Firms ◽  
Transfer Pricing ◽  
Multinational Firm ◽  
Profit Shifting ◽  
Goods And Services ◽  
Internal Goods ◽  
Transfer Prices ◽  
Debt Shifting ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Thin Capitalization

AbstractThin capitalization rules limit firms’ ability to deduct internal interest payments from taxable income, thereby restricting debt shifting activities of multinational firms. Since multinational firms can limit their tax liability in several ways, regulation of debt shifting may have an impact on other profit shifting methods. We therefore provide a model in which a multinational firm can shift profits out of a host country by issuing internal debt from an entity located in a tax haven and by manipulating transfer prices on internal goods and services. The focus of this paper is the analysis of regulatory incentives, $$(i)$$ ( i ) if a multinational firm treats debt shifting and transfer pricing as substitutes or $$(ii)$$ ( i i ) if the methods are not directly connected. The results provide a new aspect for why hybrid thin capitalization rules are used. Our discussion in this paper explains why hybrid rules can result in improvements in welfare if multinational firms treat methods of profit shifting as substitutes.

The Impact of Thin Capitalization Rules on Subsidiary Financing: Evidence from Belgium

De Economist ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 168 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-51
Author(s):  
Dave Goyvaerts ◽  
Annelies Roggeman
Keyword(s):  
The Impact ◽  
Thin Capitalization

Interest barrier rules as a response to highly leveraged transactions

2012 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 206-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thorsten Knauer ◽  
Friedrich Sommer
Keyword(s):  
Interest Barrier

scholarly journals Determinan Penghindaran Pajak Dengan Corporate Social Responsibility Sebagai Variabel Moderasi

1970 ◽  
Vol 4 (02) ◽  
pp. 182-194
Author(s):  
Purwoko Erie Dharmawan ◽  
Syahril Djaddang ◽  
Darmansyah Darmansyah
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Significant Influence ◽  
Transfer Pricing ◽  
Tax Avoidance ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Jel Classification ◽  
Tax Haven ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
Thin Capitalization

ABSTRACT This study aimed to analyze the influence of transfer pricing, thin capitalization, dan tax haven utilization against tax avoidance. This sudy also uses corporate social responsibility as a moderating variable. This study uses secondary data from manufacturing listed company during period of 2014-2016. Samples taken by using purposive sampling method and obtain 189 sampel consist of 63 companies during three years period. The method of testing the data used in this study is panel data regression analysis and descriptive statistics. The result showed that the transfer pricing has significant effect on tax avoidance, while thin capitalization dan tax haven utilization has no significant effect on tax avoidance. Corporate social responsibility has significant influence as moderating between transfer pricing and tax avoidance, but corporate social responsibility has no significant influence as moderating between thin capitalization dan tax haven utilization and tax avoidance. ABSTRAK Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh transfer pricing, thin capitalization, dan tax haven utilization terhadap penghindaran pajak. Peneltian ini juga menggunakan variabel corporate social responsibility sebagai variabel yang memoderasi pengaruh transfer pricing, thin capitalization, dan tax haven utilization terhadap penghindaran pajak. Studi ini menggunakan data sekunder dari perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di bursa efek indonesia. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan metode purposive samping. Sampel yang diperoleh sebanyak 189 sampel, terdiri dari 63 perusahaan manufaktur selama periode tiga tahun yaitu 2014 – 2016. Metode analisis yang digunakan dalam mengolah data menggunakan analisis regresi data panel. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa transfer pricing berpengaruh signifikan terhadap penghindaran pajak, sementara thin capitalization dan tax haven utilization tidak berpengaruh signifikan terhadap penghindaran pajak. Corporate social responsibility dapat memoderasi pengaruh transfer pricing terhadap penghindaran pajak, namun corporate social responsibility tidak dapat memoderasi pengaruh thin capitalization dan tax haven utilization terhadap penghindaran pajak. JEL Classification: MH14, H26, H32

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document