Analysis of Product Rollover Strategies in the Presence of Strategic Customers

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao Liang ◽  
Metin Cakanyildirim ◽  
Suresh Sethi
Keyword(s):  
2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Guodaohou Song ◽  
Xiaofang Wang

AbstractProduction cost can be influenced by previous sales in an uncertain way. In reality, production cost may decrease in the number of initial buyers due to the learning effect, or increase in the number of initial buyers due to the quality-improving pressure from negative comments of unhappy users. Taking this uncertainty into account, this paper studies the optimal intertemporal pricing strategies of a firm when selling to strategic customers in two periods where production cost in the second period randomly changes with the number of buyers in the first period. Our results suggest how firms should adjust their optimal pricing strategies under different market circumstances.


2017 ◽  
Vol 63 (7) ◽  
pp. 2092-2107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernando Bernstein ◽  
Victor Martínez-de-Albéniz
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 2248-2280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amir Farshbaf‐Geranmayeh ◽  
Masoud Rabbani ◽  
Ata Allah Taleizadeh

2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 1119-1142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yiwei Chen ◽  
Vivek F. Farias

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (03) ◽  
pp. 1950011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feng Yang ◽  
Junjun Kong ◽  
Minyue Jin

This paper investigates the implications of selling effort upon a monopolistic seller’s optimal pricing decisions and its performance in the presence of strategic customers. In our model, strategic customers can anticipate future price discounts and decide on when to purchase products from the seller over two periods. The direct impact of selling effort is to induce more customers to purchase in the first period. Two pricing policies are under consideration: (i) preannounced pricing under which the seller commits to a price path over two periods in advance; (ii) contingent pricing under which the seller can dynamically set a price in each period. The analytical results demonstrate that preannounced pricing always dominates contingent pricing from the seller’s perspective. Moreover, compared with the results under contingent pricing, selling effort is enhanced but market demand is shrunk under preannounced pricing. Through sensitivity analysis, we further find that when customers become more willing to postpone their purchases to the second period, the seller should reduce its selling effort in the first period if the demand-enhancement effect of selling effort is sufficiently low.


2014 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 1033-1056 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao Liang ◽  
Metin Çakanyıldırım ◽  
Suresh P. Sethi
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document